MyDoorsAreOpen
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2003
- Messages
- 8,549
I get the sense I'm about to get some serious disrespect, in many people's eyes, for this post -- a lot of 'get with the fucking program, you retard / chump / pussy' type replies. But before you give me one of these, please hear me out, and listen to where I'm coming from.
First of all, I may have a perverse fascination with the seedy underbelly of society, especially as portrayed on TV. I may use drugs. I may go to parties in cities, that require me to keep an eye out for myself. But I'm about as far from 'street' as you can get. I was raised in a loving intact family, in a quiet neighborhood. I settle problems by confronting people verbally, and if repeated attempts to do this don't work, I appeal to authorities. Violence and threats don't enter into it; I look long-term, and those kinds of things have long-term consequences. Call me what you will. I call this normal. I'm not saying this in order to make people who've been less fortunate than me feel resentful (though in my experience, that effect is inevitable
). I'm saying this in order to make it crystal clear where I'm coming from.
So anyway, I understand why a career criminal, especially one who works with other career criminals, doesn't snitch to the authorities when someone commits a crime against him. Not only is this hypocritical, but it's suicidal, both to the snitch AND to those he works with. He doesn't snitch because his hands aren't clean either. I don't need anyone to explain this to me.
But I've heard people say / post things which imply that all illegal drug users are bound by the 'no snitching' rule, and this is where my understanding runs out. So let me get this straight. Say I'm a mild-mannered guy, with a legitimate career, who relaxes with a joint in the evenings, in his own home, with no one else. I keep my use very discrete. I break no other laws. Then one day I get mugged, and I know who did it and where to find him. But simply because I enjoy pot, I am obligated to seek this guy out and get my revenge on him personally (or hire someone else to do it for me) rather than going to the cops.
Is there something I'm missing here??
I've also heard people take this a step further, and imply that NO ONE should snitch, even people who do absolutely nothing illegal themselves. In other words, the only kind of justice that's honorable is justice that you take into your own hands.
I just don't see the wisdom in this. I'm going to potentially THROW MY LIFE AWAY just because someone did me wrong?? Call me naive or old fashioned, but I thought the whole point of paying taxes to support public institutions like the police and the justice system was so that we DIDN'T have to live the Law of the Jungle.
So what is it that motivates this 'no snitching FOR ANYONE' interpretation? Is it a boycott of cops, as a matter of principle, similar to people who hate doctors and treat everything with home remedies? That's the only thing I can think of. What kinds of people (besides career criminals) are likeliest to have this strictest interpretation of the 'no snitching' rule, and why?
Am I so wrong for wanting to live a long and safe life, even if that means abandoning my primitive notions of 'honor' from time to time?
First of all, I may have a perverse fascination with the seedy underbelly of society, especially as portrayed on TV. I may use drugs. I may go to parties in cities, that require me to keep an eye out for myself. But I'm about as far from 'street' as you can get. I was raised in a loving intact family, in a quiet neighborhood. I settle problems by confronting people verbally, and if repeated attempts to do this don't work, I appeal to authorities. Violence and threats don't enter into it; I look long-term, and those kinds of things have long-term consequences. Call me what you will. I call this normal. I'm not saying this in order to make people who've been less fortunate than me feel resentful (though in my experience, that effect is inevitable

So anyway, I understand why a career criminal, especially one who works with other career criminals, doesn't snitch to the authorities when someone commits a crime against him. Not only is this hypocritical, but it's suicidal, both to the snitch AND to those he works with. He doesn't snitch because his hands aren't clean either. I don't need anyone to explain this to me.
But I've heard people say / post things which imply that all illegal drug users are bound by the 'no snitching' rule, and this is where my understanding runs out. So let me get this straight. Say I'm a mild-mannered guy, with a legitimate career, who relaxes with a joint in the evenings, in his own home, with no one else. I keep my use very discrete. I break no other laws. Then one day I get mugged, and I know who did it and where to find him. But simply because I enjoy pot, I am obligated to seek this guy out and get my revenge on him personally (or hire someone else to do it for me) rather than going to the cops.

I've also heard people take this a step further, and imply that NO ONE should snitch, even people who do absolutely nothing illegal themselves. In other words, the only kind of justice that's honorable is justice that you take into your own hands.
I just don't see the wisdom in this. I'm going to potentially THROW MY LIFE AWAY just because someone did me wrong?? Call me naive or old fashioned, but I thought the whole point of paying taxes to support public institutions like the police and the justice system was so that we DIDN'T have to live the Law of the Jungle.
So what is it that motivates this 'no snitching FOR ANYONE' interpretation? Is it a boycott of cops, as a matter of principle, similar to people who hate doctors and treat everything with home remedies? That's the only thing I can think of. What kinds of people (besides career criminals) are likeliest to have this strictest interpretation of the 'no snitching' rule, and why?
Am I so wrong for wanting to live a long and safe life, even if that means abandoning my primitive notions of 'honor' from time to time?