• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

soaked blotter? fact or fiction?

d-Dexter-25 said:
Also people who lay down blotter into the liquid rathing then laying it onto the blotter is obviously not experienced with laying LSD and unless your laying hundreds of bibles good luck with getting all onto that blotter cause much will be left in the bottom of the pan thus flucuating that dose substaintialy thus making it impossible to gauge!!!
Click to expand...

How do you figure that, explain to me please.

Some posts above I dreamt up a method laying the blotters in nearly the exact volume of liquid that will be absorbed so there will be only a minute bit left, where upon you can pour the next solution.
Besides if it's in solution why apart from evaporation would the concentration in the liquid ever fluctuate??

If it wasn't obvious, I have no experience. But that sounds like it would work. Humor me, what's so impractical?
 
I've heard that the corners of the sheets are more potent that, say, the middle of the sheet.

Something to do with the way it drip/drys.

Don't know what to think about that..
 
Solipsis said:
How do you figure that, explain to me please.

Some posts above I dreamt up a method laying the blotters in nearly the exact volume of liquid that will be absorbed so there will be only a minute bit left, where upon you can pour the next solution.
Besides if it's in solution why apart from evaporation would the concentration in the liquid ever fluctuate??

If it wasn't obvious, I have no experience. But that sounds like it would work. Humor me, what's so impractical?
Click to expand...

The problem is that by laying the blotter down into the pan with the solution it leaves residue because you need to achieve a saturated state so the dose is evenly distributed but the blotter will soak most of it up as long as the calculations are right but I garrentee it will be hard to find the perfect size pan and perfect amount of solution to not leave any in the bottom which believe me is a pain in the ass!!!

So why would you even waste your time, its simple make a solution lets say your laying a sheet at 100ug a square ok well thats 10mg and I can tell you for most blotters .75ml will saturate the sheet without over saturating creating left overs on whatever you are using as a base. You suck this up into the syringe and then squirt it out onto the blotter covering it although it asorbs right into pretty fast using blank side up!!! Now most likely if your just laying some liquid you won't know the exact dosage per amount so you will need to experiment some but its much easier then laying it into a pan unless you do the same thing but put the .75ml down first then the blotter then let evaporate in the pan but again trust me its hard to not have residue left over in the pan which you are laying more into btw good luck calculating that although minor its still a flucuation!!!

Oh and after the last sheet is laid whats left near the tip about .01ml you can just wash out and wash down for yourself!!!
 
Also be careful with blotters that are "inked" all the way through meaning the blank side is not really blank because its all ready been soaked with ink which is a big pain and will run all over and fuck up the doses which sucks especially when you already laid many sheets before picking up the first after dry just to find orange ink all over the base which is chock full of LSD and theres no way to tell how much ended up on the base or blotter :\ !!!
 
Solipsis said:
Uhm but if the blotter paper is not saturated why would you not increase the concentration of acid in solvent initially? If you know that your paper will absorb some volume of liquid you might as well cram the max amount of acid in there right away right?
Click to expand...

Becuase you don't want to lay 3000ug tabs for everyone. The majority of people who buy tabs aren't going to be able to handle it; or want that. 100ug is a good dose for most people; and it allows them to effectively titrate how much they want. So if you lay 75% of your paper at street loading (say 100-200ug) and then the remainder which is destined for a smaller circulation gets a second, third or even fouth dip to bring it up to a higher potency.
 
d-Dexter-25 said:
The problem is that by laying the blotter down into the pan with the solution it leaves residue because you need to achieve a saturated state so the dose is evenly distributed but the blotter will soak most of it up as long as the calculations are right but I garrentee it will be hard to find the perfect size pan and perfect amount of solution to not leave any in the bottom which believe me is a pain in the ass!!!

So why would you even waste your time, its simple make a solution lets say your laying a sheet at 100ug a square ok well thats 10mg and I can tell you for most blotters .75ml will saturate the sheet without over saturating creating left overs on whatever you are using as a base. You suck this up into the syringe and then squirt it out onto the blotter covering it although it asorbs right into pretty fast using blank side up!!! Now most likely if your just laying some liquid you won't know the exact dosage per amount so you will need to experiment some but its much easier then laying it into a pan unless you do the same thing but put the .75ml down first then the blotter then let evaporate in the pan but again trust me its hard to not have residue left over in the pan which you are laying more into btw good luck calculating that although minor its still a flucuation!!!

Oh and after the last sheet is laid whats left near the tip about .01ml you can just wash out and wash down for yourself!!!
Click to expand...

I'm starting to wonder where you're getting this but I'm still just not convinced. You'd have to squirt very evenly to get a uniform distribution and even if you would have residue the concentration of acid in that should not have changed. It would depend on how fast you are doing all this because evaporation could be a problem but I just don't see what the big deal is.
 
I think he is saying you just have to squirt it along the bottom and the capillary action will evenly spread it through out the blotter.

Finding this thread very interesting as I always wondered how this might be done on a large scale.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top