Nicomorphinist
Bluelighter
i wonder why no new analogs of say Hydromorphone or of any of the codones have been manufactured, perhaps because theyre naturally derived ? but they should be able to create some analog of say oxycodone since its semi synthetic ya think? perhaps because itd be too complicated it hasn't been done
i find nothing feels as good as a natural opiate like morphine/Heroin and the more synthetic you go the less pain relieving it gets aswell, don't get me wrong oxy works wonders but isn't close to the pain relief i get from morphine, been awhile since i've had some dope, been thinking of getting some for awhile now, not to iv but to smoke, its always nice to smoke some good product now and then. been thinking of putting up the extra bucks and getting some proper opium to mix up with my crack
The research right now seems focussed on modified 14-dihydromorphinones like benzhydrocodone, oxymorphol (which is a mixture of hydromorphinol and another oxymorphone relative 4,5α-Epoxy-17-methylmorphinan-3,6β,14-triol) and derivatives thereof by pharmaceutical companies like Endo, and then there was the work by the Schmidhammer crew at the Universität Innsbruck starting about 20 years ago with 14-methoxymetopon which is a million times more potent than morphine. There is actually a lot of work that was done in the 1920s and 1930s on morphine and dihydromorphine derivatives which was not pursued further because about a dozen new semi-synthetics had already gone on the market from 1914 to 1941.
Detailed information on several hundred of these drugs, as well as a great deal of research on morphine, codeine, and opium and all the rest, can be found in the National Research Council of the United States' publication The Report of the Committee On Drug Addiction 1929-1941 & Selected Reprints, the PDF can be found by starting a search at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jps.3030301214 -- it is also a 1000-plus-page book that can be tracked down. For instance there is detailed information on such things as codeine's isomers which include allocodeine, pseudocodeine, pseudoallocodeine, and isocodeine, an important one four times stronger than codeine. Dihydroisocodeine (DHIC) has been used as an uncommon pharmaceutical in Europe and other places; I have used it in the past and all I can recall for a brand name was DHIC and that I got it in Spain. Then of course there is heterocodeine, 72 to 108 times stronger, also covered in the book.
Also there is more discovery of yeast, fungi, and bacteria naturally making morphine, codeine, thebaine, papaverine, oripavine, and semi-synthetics like oxymorphone, hydrocodone, hydromorphinol and a bunch of others -- in this latter case, the Pseudomonas putida Trevisan 1889 serotype M10 used to eat crude oil spilled on the ocean. That was 1993; the yeast that turn sugar to morphine was two years ago.
Then there were attempts to modify the effects by combining morphine with other active agents, like sticking dinitrophenol to morphine to get 2,4-dinitrophenylmorphine to reduce the respiratory depression. They started inventing antagonists and agonist-antagonists in 1915 by sticking things to the 17 position, halogenating the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and/or 14 positions has all sorts of effects and so on, so I think that heading down to the stacks to look through some of these older journal articles and so forth and using the formulae searching computer to play Tetris and surf tasteful progressive pr0n for a day or so might have some serendipitous effects . . .
Last edited: