I agree with sero.
As for Lysis's reply...that is pretty much what I am doing. I'm just going to not post it, to minimize the amount of drama in my life.
Akautonomics: By asking me to edit my post, you are still asking me redact my original work on the subject, not because it was factually incorrect (a valid reason to redact something), not because it was plagiarism (A valid reason too, but I made no claims the data presented was my original research because it was not) not because I did have the right to post it in the sense of not having the consent of the other authors (valid reason, but I had no other authors who release I needed to obtain.) but simply because some people (including yourself) did not like what I had to say, and did not like the factual statements about the IMPLICATIONS of the facts being presented. Implications of scientific fact or theories are just as important as the facts themselves. General Relativity's implications about the invariance of the speed of light in all reference frames is ESSENTIAL things like GPS and RADAR and laser measurement devices. Similarly, implications of quantum electrodynamics are critical to semi-conductor design and atomic clocks. The implications of the fact one can determine sex from unchangeable anatomical findings is essential to fields like forensic pathology, those same implications also show that a transsexual person will always be able to be identified based on those findings.
If that causes them cognitive dissonance, well, I'm really sorry but I am going to say "get the fuck over it" I'm sure implications of general relativity cause severe cognitive dissonance for Young Earth Creationists (re:
star light problem) as do implications of The Standard Model of Particle Physics (re: radiometric dating of the age of the Earth) Geology and Geophysics (The ability to date the Earth by the changes in the Magnetic poles of the Earth having effects on crystals in rocks that can be dated) and yes, even (perhaps most of all) Life Sci/biology/medicine. (Phylogenetics showing common descent, the ability to actually WATCH evolution take place in microbes in the lab, the ability to insert human genes into bacteria and have them express the proteins just like a human would, reinforcing the idea of common descent via demonstrating that the genetic code is the same across all life.)
Yet, you have no problem with me digging into people who hold those kind of beliefs, even though religious beliefs are often as deeply held as anything can be. You have no problem objectifying and trivializing the experience of soldiers (like myself) and making them into sexualized objects, despite how horrifically traumatic it is to actually be in combat. Check *your*
privilege, you middle class, Western world living person who's never had to worry if each step they took would trigger an IED and maim or kill them. Double check it when you ask someone who fought for the freedom of expression to not use that freedom.
Triple check it when that person self identifies as "queer" and is making a criticism of the LGBTQ community, and when they've fought, like *fought* -guns, bombs and alls- to try to end the oppression of women and LGBTQ people in one of the most repressed countries on Earth, while all you've done is whine about someone's post on tumblr being "mean".
Pagey: Care to elaborate why you agree?