Oh and the needle exchange thing is dead on, only it doesn't play well as an analogy for press interviews. Yes it is exactly the same principle, but too much alike and doesn't give the viewer anything to relate to personally. And to be bloody honest the last thing we want to do is relate recreational ecstasy users to habitual iV drug users.
(Yes, yes, mibrane, I know, but one battle at a time OK? I am going to get slayed for that one but I'm not going to lie to you. This is a battle that is going to be fought in the living rooms of Ray Martin-country and we have to structure our message appropriately)
This is not just a difference of perception, however. Ecstasy is being used by a large part of the genereal community and is being intergrated into Australian social life. The government, and the public at large, must understand that this is a public health issue for all, not just for a marginalised fringe of society.
Also needle exchanges work under strict legislative guidelines that took 10 years of hard slog to get working. We have barely begun that journey with pill testing. Much of what will happen in the coming years will follow the trail blazed by the needle exchange pioneers and yes it is worthwhile reminding the "Major' Watters types that there is precedent but hypocrisy is nothing new to this lot.