• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio

simple/quick question: WHERE is the tolerance to opiates in the brain?

Jabberwocky

Frumious Bandersnatch
Joined
Nov 3, 1999
Messages
1,256
Location
Looking-Glass Land
Simple quick question for ya'll (hopefully)

where are the changes in the brain found when a user takes opiates regularly (ie WHERE is the tolerance).

I've been trying to google this but I feel like a dullard not knowing exactly how to phrase the question to google. I need a study basically saying THIS is the area that receptors are downregulated (or some such).

thanks for letting me lean on your knowledge ;)
 
Have fun. Most opiates don't cause down regulation, only the really potent things like fentanyl and etorphine produce significant changes.
 
I was under the impression that it had to do with enzyme activity. The enzymes get better and better over time at clearing out the drugs, no? Also, I remember hearing (though doubting) that use of opiates kills off Mu receptors.
 
Y'all are both wrong :) It's got a lot more to do with protein kinase phosphorylating stuff, increasing adenylate cyclase activity and therefore producing more cAMP. I mean, yeah, some receptors downregulate but not really. Other important systems are changes in orphanin HQ, Neuropeptide Y and CRF levels. As for WHERE this tolerance happens, well... I'd imagine most of it happens where the opiate acts in the first place! Some of the reinforcing, rewarding effects happen in the Ventral tegmental area and the NAc, but the "liking", opioidergic effects seem to be centered in the Ventral Pallidum.

My "Neurobiology of Addiction" text (which is majorly excellent - Lawrence Koob, muthafuckaaaaz) says the densest areas for mu binding are patches in the NAc, caudate-putamen, diagonal band of Broca, globus pallidus and ventral pallidum, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, most thalamic nuclei, medial and cortical amygdala, mammillary nuclei, presubiculum, interpeduncular nucleus, median raphe, raphe magnus, parabrachial nucleus, locus coeruleus, nucleus ambiguus and nucleus of the solitary tract. These are sites with high correlations between mRNA expression of the mu opioid receptor and binding of 3H-DAMGO.

Sorry for such a long list. If you want me to dig for something more, let me know. I can probably figure out the most significant contributors to withdrawal and relapse, if you're interested. I'm writing a paper on all of this ;)
 
damnit where'd my post go? It discussed ORL-1 (or whatever it's called now) and it's place in opioid tolerance (and the ORL antagonists (or are the agonists? I forget now) that prevent tolerance; IIRC, Herkinorin has the correct mu agonism and ORL whatever that results in none or nearly no tolerance.
 
damnit where'd my post go? It discussed ORL-1 (or whatever it's called now) and it's place in opioid tolerance (and the ORL antagonists (or are the agonists? I forget now) that prevent tolerance; IIRC, Herkinorin has the correct mu agonism and ORL whatever that results in none or nearly no tolerance.

http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/20/7640

Enhanced Spinal Nociceptin Receptor Expression Develops Morphine Tolerance and Dependence said:
The tolerance and dependence after chronic medication with morphine are thought to be representative models for studying the plasticity, including the remodeling of neuronal networks. To test the hypothesis that changes in neuronal plasticity observed in opioid tolerance or dependence are derived from increased activity of the anti-opioid nociceptin system, the effects of chronic treatments with morphine were examined using nociceptin receptor knock-out (NOR-/-) mice and a novel nonpeptidic NOR antagonist, J-113397, which shows a specific and potent NOR antagonist activity in in vitro [35S]GTPgamma S binding assay and in vivo peripheral nociception test. The NOR-/- mice showed marked resistance to morphine analgesic tolerance without affecting morphine analgesic potency in tail-pinch and tail-flick tests. The NOR-/- mice also showed marked attenuation of morphine-induced physical dependence, manifested as naloxone-precipitated withdrawal symptoms after repeated morphine treatments. Similar marked attenuation of morphine tolerance was also observed by single subcutaneous (10 mg/kg) or intrathecal (1 nmol) injection of J-113397, which had been given 60 min before the test in morphine-treated ddY mice. However, the intracerebroventricular injection (up to 3 nmol) did not affect the tolerance. On the other hand, morphine dependence was markedly attenuated by J-113397 that had been subcutaneously given 60 min before naloxone challenge. There was also observed a parallel enhancement of NOR gene expression only in the spinal cord during chronic morphine treatments. Together, these findings suggest that the spinal NOR system develops anti-opioid plasticity observed on morphine tolerance and dependence.

Edit: Neat. So I'll just ad J-113397 to my list of substances that can attenuate, prevent, and/or reverse opioid tolerance:

7-nitro-indazole
proglumide
phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors
J-113397

Each has a different mechanism of action, so to combine them might in theory increase sensitivity to opioids even if you were concurrently having yourself a little opioid binge. Although, I doubt either 7-nitro-indazole or j-113397 is permeable to the blood brain barrier... Don't really want to drill a hole in my skull and inject them directly into my ventricles.
 
Last edited:
one ting we can all agree on is that this is not a simple or quick question heh
 
Herkinorin has the correct mu agonism and ORL whatever that results in none or nearly no tolerance.

Ive said it before and ill say it again-i will be SHOCKED if Herkinorin actually turns out to not cause tolerance out in the real world. I know there are some promising aspects of this drug, especially concerning its seeming lack of recruiting b-arrestin. however, i think that one good thing that has come of this thread is that we realize how complex and incomplete is our understanding of opioid related tolerance/addiction. there certainly seems to be MANY systems involved, and consequently, a substance like herkinorin would have to avoid activating ALL of these systems in order to truly be the holy grail that some are touting it as. Put simply: Its my guess that anything that activates our mu receptors will unavoidably result in tolerance and addiction.

For the record- this is one of those circumstances where Id LOVE to be wrong- DG
 
A few refs

^^^ I'm gonna say that halting b-arrestin wouldn't do much to prevent tolerance in the LONG term. Also, even though knocking out b-arrestin can prevent tolerance, it doesn't appear to prevent withdrawal(see bottom for article). Yes, b-arrestin knockout mice didn't show tolerance over short trials with some mu-agonists, but sometimes *recruiting* b-arrestin prevents tolerance, and knockout mice with mechanisms of internalization removed tend to show enhanced withdrawal due to Adenylate cyclase superactivation.

The theory behind how this works is that internalization prevents adenylyl cyclase supersensitization by phosphorylation, I think, by cAMP-dependent protein kinase:
NSFW:
Source: Unisci
Date: 25 November 2002

Reducing Tolerance To Morphine Could Aid Pain Therapy

Morphine is one of the most commonly used drugs in the treatment of severe and chronic pain. A major complication with its use over the long term is that patients develop tolerance to it, as well as becoming addicted.

A way of reducing tolerance would be of great benefit, because it would allow doctors to use lower doses over longer periods and still control pain effectively.

A study published in this week's issue of Cell provides just that, by showing that giving a small level of a different drug at the same time as morphine can reduce the development of tolerance.

As well as highlighting an exciting new way in which morphine treatment could be improved, this study also gives important new insights into the overall mechanisms that lead to tolerance, and underlines a change in thinking that has been developing over the past few years.

Morphine acts by binding a receptor (the mu opioid receptor) on the surface of nerve cells and signaling from it. When this receptor binds to its normal signaling molecule, it is activated and then becomes desensitized.

The receptor then moves into the cell by a process called endocytosis. Once in the cell, it can then be reactivated and transferred back to the cell surface, ready to bind to a new signaling molecule and signal again.

Morphine, however, is not able to cause the desensitization and recycling, so morphine-bound receptors stay on the cell surface. Until quite recently, most researchers assumed that endocytosis of the receptors contributed to tolerance, because it would reduce the number of receptors available on the cell surface for binding to morphine.

However, recent studies have led to an alternative view, in which endocytosis might in fact help to reduce tolerance by recycling the receptors so they can become active again.

Jennifer Whistler and colleagues, working at the University of California in San Francisco, published results relating to this in Neuron in December 2001, where they showed that endocytosis is associated with reduced tolerance in cultured cells. In the new study, Dr. Whistler's group develop their findings and, most importantly, take the therapeutically important step of showing that they also hold true in whole animals.

In the new paper, Drs. He, Fong, von Zastrow and Whistler looked at clustering of the receptors into groups. Morphine-bound receptors can still cluster, but they do not normally move into the cell interior.

However, the authors found that binding of a compound called DAMGO to a small number of receptors in a group can cause the whole group to be taken up.

This means that a small amount of DAMGO can drag other receptors that have bound morphine inside the cells, ready for recycling. This caused a reduction in tolerance in cell culture assays, and receptor endocytosis in the spinal cord.

Most significantly, however, the authors found that over a seven day morphine treatment, giving rats a small amount of DAMGO at the same time as the morphine eliminated the tolerance that would normally develop during that time.

On the seventh day, the morphine dose was essentially as effective as it was on the first.

The significance of these results is clear: if we can develop a drug that will act in the same way as DAMGO to promote receptor endocytosis, this could be used with morphine to reduce tolerance, and thus increase the effectiveness of treatment.

Up to now, many drug discovery programs have thrown away candidate drugs that cause desensitization and endocytosis of morphine receptors, because they were working on the assumption that they would increase tolerance.
These new results show that, in fact, the opposite seems to be true, and give new hope for pain relief.

(Reference: Endocytosis of the Mu Opioid Receptor Reduces Tolerance And a Cellular Hallmark of Opiate Withdrawal, A.K. Finn and J. Whistler, Neuron Vol. No. 32 [2001] 829-839.)



"Protein kinases modulate the cellular adaptations associated with opioid tolerance and dependence
Jing-Gen Liua and K. J. S. Anand"
Prolonged opioid exposure occurs frequently as a result of clinical use or drug abuse. Research using different ligands, cell lines, and animal models in the past three decades has elucidated some correlation between the biochemical events and behavioral changes resulting from opioid tolerance, dependence and addiction. For the most part, opioid tolerance and dependence are associated with up-regulation of the cAMP pathway, mediated by the supersensitization of adenylyl cyclase and by the altered coupling of opioid receptors to stimulatory G proteins. Neuroadaptive changes in signal transduction following prolonged opioid exposure are mediated by protein kinase systems, such as protein kinase C (PKC), cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), Ca2+/camodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). Intermediate steps between opioid receptor activation and the second- or third-messenger cascades include GRK-mediated receptor endocytosis and intracellular trafficking, as well as interactions with excitatory amino acid receptors and regulation of nitric oxide synthesis. Thus, prolonged occupancy by opioid receptor agonists can have differential effects on opioid receptor internalization, down-regulation and desensitization, and in the supersensitization of adenylyl cyclase, which contribute to the development of opioid tolerance and dependence. We discuss the role of various protein kinases in the signaling mechanisms underlying these differences. Clearer understanding of the molecular mechanisms of opioid tolerance and dependence will help in the treatment of patients suffering from acute and chronic pain, or drug dependence and addiction.

Anyway, I just wanna state that this goes SO far beyond b-arrestin, as daddysgone suggests. Desensitization of receptors is a mechanism of tolerance (by decoupling the g-protein from the receptor), but not the whole picture.

Bohn, L.M., Gainetdinov, R.R., Lin, F.T., Lefkowitz, R.J. and Caron, M.G., 2000. Mu-opioid receptor desensitization by beta-arrestin-2 determines morphine tolerance but not dependence. Nature 408, pp. 720–723.
NSFW:
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the info monkey mantra! good stuff.

what about also the PAG? Berridge and Robbins (from their incentive salience theory of addiction) claim that PET scans of both heroin injections and heroin-injection cues activate this area (and the ventral tegmental).

Here's a quick clip from their 2000:

Recently, PET has also been used to quantify
changes in blood ￾ ow in heroin addicts given
either an injection of heroin, or exposed to
heroin-related cues.151 In this study both heroin
and heroin-related cues activated the same structures,
especially a region of the midbrain centered
on the periaqueductal grey (PAG) and
ventral tegmental area (VTA). The PAG has
projections to the VTA, and of course, the VTA
is the origin of ascending dopamine projections
to the nucleus accumbens and neocortex. Furthermore,
these authors reported that: “midbrain
activations predict responses to salient [drugrelated]
cues in cortical and subcortical regions
implicated in reward-related behavior”, including
the anterior cingulate, amygdala and dorsolateral
prefrontal cortex (Sell et al.,151 p. 1042).
 
^^^ Oops! Forgot about that one, did I? I love all the incentive salience theory stuff. Gaian, if you're really interested in this stuff, get the surprisingly readable (to some of us) textbook, "The Neurobiology of Addiction" by Koob. It's sooooo fuckin' awesome.
 
OK I will. I'm pretty serious about it I guess since my thesis is on it. Incentive salience theory is half my thesis! I am focused on laying out the theory and then citing the problem I find in it (quickly, I think we should not endorse the way they are conceiving of addiction as compulsion because by being about a thing that can change according to the descriptions we assign to it, ie addict, ie a conscious person, we are effectively constraining the space of possibility the addict can imagine for herself in the process of recovery because our description conceives of the addict as a thing that MUST consume drugs if the incentive attribution is high enough, ie if it reaches the level of addiction which in their terms is 'compelled to use the drug when cued to use'. I think our description of addict should preserve the ability the person has to change (because there is no empirically verifiable way to know that an addict HAD to have followed through their cravings even when they do. I fully endorse their theory on all other points and suggest they back down the claim of compulsion to something less necessary like 'strongly urged to use').

Did that make sense? That was the first time I've attempted to explain my thesis in a few sentences. I would love to hear if you can parse the meaning of that Monkey Mantra and I didn't explain it awkwardly my apologies if it is not easy to read I am quite tired :D

I think the incentive salience theory is very correct. It seems to me that way at least given the evidence they have for it and in combination with my own introspection on problems with drugs I've faced in my life.
 
^ post your thesis one day, i will definitely read. endocytosis of opioid receptors research has always fascinated me
 
Top