Sorry to bump this, it pretty much seems to be a dead issue, but i can speak for the majority of my friends, and of course myself, when i say that there is a marked difference between crystal and glucose cut crystal.
having been used to meth which is "supposedly" cut 30:70 (that is, meth to glucose-which is still reasonably strong to all but the most hardened of crystal fiends!) i insuffiliated about one point of crystal over the course of an hour this morning...for academic purposes of course
.
i would say that i am WELL used to both, but this morning, in recent light of this topic, i was really paying attention to the effects. The little experiment confirmed exactly what i have been saying. i cant speak for everyone, but FOR ME and my uni mate who was with me (also a seasoned meth whore, particularly experienced with this stuff), made the same comment. that is, there is no chance in hell that the addition of glucose doesn't make a difference.
now, if you people disagree, can anyone explain this?
NB: i have never knowingly had stuff cut with epsom salts, and although in most people's eyes i am a regular user, i have never injected (and never will). would this fact make a difference as to the effect of the addition of glucose?? the only thing i can come up with isi imagine its similar to pills VS. MDMA crystals...