I was wondering where everyone else was. :D
G0to -
"...there is no point in even discussing 'what ifs'."
Thousands of people affected negatively by MDMA would disagree with you.
In the absence of definitive scientific explanations, the extreme nature of MDMA recovery is well-deserving of this 'what if' game.
As annoying as you may find it, it is unavoidable.
Imagine if other mental disorders could be clearly blamed on a single event - wouldn't this event deserve a mountain of conjecture?
Science is essentially a more precise 'what if', but you already know this.
In my post history you can find quite a lot of information that stems from 'peer-reviewed' research. I have a solid background on MDMA research, even if I fail to provide citations for my countless essays. I am working on this list of citations - it is quite time consuming.
Aside from my 'brain-gut' assertion (which is
somewhat subjective), most of my theories are quite BASIC and irrefutable. I am not leading newcomers astray. Regardless of the popular opinion here, there are some very basic findings that are accepted among researchers. Finding these may not be easy, but they do form a foundation of understanding. Not the 'half-baked' subjective pseudoscience that you (and others) prefer to imagine.
caius -
Refer to the above statement.
Some of my writing is subjective, but labeling it all pseudoscience ignores the real information that I spout. Are you even willing to find it, or are you just another MDMA worshiper that dislikes an opposing voice with writing skills?
I have a REAL problem with doctor's prescribing SSRIs.
That does not amount to abandoning all medical care.
Indeed, I recommend people taper carefully if stopping an SSRI with doctor supervision.
I also consider CBT to be of real value.
And of course, medicine has saved a few people from the lethal and confounding cascade of events that leads to hepatoxicity, renal failure, hyponatremia, and ischemic stroke. For acute reactions, the hospital is the ONLY choice.
The neurologists with MDMA experience do NOT prescribe anti-depressants.
That should mean something.
What the hell does a GP know that makes them more qualified?
By the way, I acknowledge that taking SSRIs often results in a quick improvement in symptoms.
This has been reported by a few people on BL - they even go as far as saying they feel a
major change within the first few doses!
That doesn't sound right, does it?
![wry grin :\ :\](https://bluelight.org/xf/BL_Images/Orig_Emoji/wrygrin.gif)
It is
agreed upon that MDMA 're-wires' the brain.
It is also understood that this takes place over a 'protracted' period of time.
Hmmm...
Maybe something that makes the patient feel immediately better is NOT a substitute for a 1-2 year process of 're-wiring'.
Is this more pseudoscience?
Or goddamn common sense?
I have read several anecdotal reports on BL that say SSRI use slowed down the recovery process considerably.
My own experience with Piracetam seems to confirm this.
Even in MICRO doses, the stuff made me feel
fantastic by the 2nd or 3rd day.
But sure enough...when I stopped taking it the inevitable slide down-hill began.
The process of 're-wiring' was waiting for me
every single time.
There is no way around this process, one
must go through it.
Moving neurotransmitters around or making them more accessible to pathways is NOT a substitute for the difficult process of axonal re-organization.
There is a reason this process takes so long, and any treatment that attempts to avoid this is BAD medicine.
The idea that doctors have the answers is definitely doing HARM.
Perhaps one day new drugs or stem cell therapy will help restore or preserve original innervation patterns.
We are not there yet.
Don't even get me started on benzos...
More people went to the ER from benzo abuse than illegal drugs last year.
For one-time/emergency use they are great, but the practice of regular use is extremely foolish.
The role of doctors for people in recovery from MDMA is to
research, NOT to medicate.
Healthy lifestyle, supplementation, and abundant patience is the ONLY prescription.
Oppose me with citations please.
Specialspack -
Which answers are so 'wrong'?
Again, most of my assertions are very BASIC and backed up by real research.
While my writing may be filled with rhetoric, there is real substance behind it.
But I like your analogy to religion.
Ironically, a measure of faith IS required by those in recovery.
Research does show that clinical recovery occurs eventually, it just can't explain why.
I like your finishing statement, though.
I agree with it 100%.
Much of science is NOT definitive.
We can explain that gravity is a function of mass, distance, and a universal constant...
but we can't explain WHY it exists.
Just an easy example...
But I understand that this forum does not exist for the purpose of helping the lost and weary.
I guess that's what TDS is for, but they still show up on your door-step.
Why is that?
As I said - 'They just want answers.'
Yes - even if the answers are not definitive, or even... *gasp* wrong.
I guess I'm done.
I'll see this thread later - hopefully to discuss HPPD or strokes...