3rd_I_blind
Bluelighter
That is really shitty politics, but some governments have a history of communicating this way, LOL. Anyway...propaganda does not automatically mean the opposite is true. It would be very ignorant to consider all scientists as government-funded brainwashers that only produce results that underscore some hidden agenda. Why would they, for instance, publish reports where compounds are searched to protect against MDMA-induced neurotoxicity? That would not make any sense if it was all propaganda.Well, one time they enhanced the colors in some brain scan pictures, added the caption "Ecstasy puts holes in your brain," and then widely distributed the resulting propaganda.
By the way, the concept of 'soft' and 'hard' drugs has never received much support from the scientific community. So you are probably taking it way too semantic if you state that you regard MDMA as a soft drug, thus declaring its potential risks are non-existent. Alcohol is regarded as soft drugs too, for fuck sake...


