Scientists say outlawing psychedelic drugs makes no sense
27 MAY 2015
Douglas Main
In the United States and Britain, psychedelics are considered Schedule 1 drugs, the most restrictive category, making them legally more prohibited than cocaine, opium and methamphetamine, among others. Substances in this grouping are considered to have “no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse,” according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency. “Schedule 1 drugs are the most dangerous drugs of all the drug schedules with potentially severe psychological or physical dependence,” the agency notes.
But a wealth of research, new and old, as well as common sense, shows that when it comes to many psychedelics, this statement is incorrect. Psychedelics like LSD and psilocybin, the active ingredient in “magic” mushrooms, do have potential in the treatment of a variety of ailments, are not harmful when used in controlled settings and pose little to no risk of dependence, says James Rucker, a researcher at King’s College in London.
This Schedule 1 listing makes it “nearly impossible” to study these promising compounds, Rucker says. Despite the challenges, a few studies have been completed in the past decade that have shown LSD and psilocybin may be useful in treating anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder, tobacco and alcohol addiction, and cluster headaches.
The legal status of these chemicals perpetuates a stigma against them, Rucker argues in a paper published this week in The BMJ. “This means that research funding bodies are uncomfortable funding the research that might challenge the prevailing stigma, and generate the evidence that will confirm or deny the theory that they could help people suffering from depression and anxiety problems and drug and alcohol dependence problems,” he says.
continued here http://www.rawstory.com/2015/05/scientists-say-outlawing-psychedelic-drugs-makes-no-sense/
27 MAY 2015
Douglas Main
In the United States and Britain, psychedelics are considered Schedule 1 drugs, the most restrictive category, making them legally more prohibited than cocaine, opium and methamphetamine, among others. Substances in this grouping are considered to have “no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse,” according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency. “Schedule 1 drugs are the most dangerous drugs of all the drug schedules with potentially severe psychological or physical dependence,” the agency notes.
But a wealth of research, new and old, as well as common sense, shows that when it comes to many psychedelics, this statement is incorrect. Psychedelics like LSD and psilocybin, the active ingredient in “magic” mushrooms, do have potential in the treatment of a variety of ailments, are not harmful when used in controlled settings and pose little to no risk of dependence, says James Rucker, a researcher at King’s College in London.
This Schedule 1 listing makes it “nearly impossible” to study these promising compounds, Rucker says. Despite the challenges, a few studies have been completed in the past decade that have shown LSD and psilocybin may be useful in treating anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder, tobacco and alcohol addiction, and cluster headaches.
The legal status of these chemicals perpetuates a stigma against them, Rucker argues in a paper published this week in The BMJ. “This means that research funding bodies are uncomfortable funding the research that might challenge the prevailing stigma, and generate the evidence that will confirm or deny the theory that they could help people suffering from depression and anxiety problems and drug and alcohol dependence problems,” he says.
continued here http://www.rawstory.com/2015/05/scientists-say-outlawing-psychedelic-drugs-makes-no-sense/
