Researcher Reveals Past As An Addict To Encourage New Tactics In War On Drugs

Tchort

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
2,390
For the first time in her career as a social researcher, Kathie Kane-Willis senses momentum shifting in America's war on drugs. She sees government officials vowing to steer addicts to treatment, not prison, and it is as if her life's work has begun to bear fruit.

But the movement still feels tenuous, needing every push it can get. So, Friday morning, she tried to give it one.

At a drug policy conference at Roosevelt University, Kane-Willis, 40, stepped before a packed meeting hall to reveal her own descent into heroin addiction, a two-year spree of self-destruction that she escaped -- by her reckoning -- largely because of advantages that many addicts don't have.

The crowd included her husband and 12-year-old daughter, as well as colleagues who knew nothing about her past. Going public was no easy decision: She viewed that dark time with shame and regret, and even though it was far behind her, she still feared being scorned as a junkie.



Yet she believed the contrast between what she was and what treatment allowed her to become was so strong, so persuasive, that it had the potential to affect lives and sway policy.

"I'm telling my story because I feel as though the tide is finally turning," she told the audience, her voice quavering slightly. "I hope and pray that I'm right about this feeling, that the war on drugs really might be coming to an end. This social justice movement is gaining strength, and I want to add my voice, my story and my face to it."

Kane-Willis was a sensitive, bookish student at Hinsdale South High School in the late 1980s, smart enough to earn entrance into highly selective Sarah Lawrence College, just north of New York City.


An aspiring writer, she loved the school's moody, creative atmosphere. But before her freshman year was half over, a long-smoldering family dysfunction that she prefers not to detail ignited, and she suffered an emotional breakdown.

Neither a hospital nor her school provided her much help, and her friends seemed to recoil from her trauma. The one place she found acceptance was with an edgy art crowd, who bolstered their outsider status by scoring heroin in the scuzzy streets of Manhattan's East Village.

Some of the youths used the drug casually, treating it as a fashionably transgressive accessory to their William S. Burroughs paperbacks and Velvet Underground albums. But heroin was no pose for Kane-Willis. It was exactly what she had been seeking.

"How I would tell that I was high is I would think about ... the most painful thing, and I could think about it in this purely intellectual way," she recalled. "My stomach wouldn't hurt. I wouldn't cry. I didn't feel that pain."

The drug dulled her misery but didn't end it, so she quit Sarah Lawrence for what she hoped would be a happier life in San Francisco. But there, settling into a neighborhood sodden with narcotics, falling for a boyfriend with his own taste for heroin, she fell into full-blown dependency.

Kane-Willis financed her drug buys with an intricate credit card scam, inventing fictitious people and running up charges in their names. In 1989, she finally was caught in a department store, and though she spent only one night in jail, the arrest convinced her that she needed help.

She went through a painful detox, and then her father, Don Kane, paid for her to enter a 28-day treatment program in Chicago. It didn't take: After a brief confinement in a psychiatric ward -- the result, she said, of her questioning the program's methods -- she walked out of the hospital and made her way to Los Angeles.

Her flight felt like defeat to her father. Kane recalled that someone at the hospital "told me I would be going to emergency rooms the rest of my life. I think he was saying that when you're into this kind of drug, you're a lost cause."

Things did get worse when Kane-Willis returned to California. As her heroin use escalated, she squatted in an abandoned restaurant with her boyfriend and continued her criminal schemes until she was arrested for shoplifting.

She was jailed for two dehumanizing weeks in a Los Angeles County lockup -- she still blanches at memories of strip searches and lice spray -- but it proved to be pivotal: She returned to Illinois soon after her release and, with the help of her father, entered psychotherapy and a privately run methadone clinic that, unlike most public programs, had no waiting list. The treatment set her on the path to her ultimate sobriety.

Her brief incarceration also stirred her social conscience. She saw that almost all of her fellow inmates had addictions and that almost none of them was white, as is she. How just were the nation's drug laws, she thought, if the mass incarceration of poor blacks and Hispanics was a result?

Her belief was fortified a year later, in 1991, when she entered a federal courtroom to plead guilty to her credit card scam and was initially mistaken for a lawyer. She took that as a sign she would be treated with leniency, and indeed, she feels that she received unusually light punishment: two years of probation after her father paid $25,000 in restitution.

Kane-Willis went on to earn a master's degree in sociology at Roosevelt University and work as a researcher in the school's Institute for Metropolitan Affairs. She specializes in issues of drug abuse, feeling driven to explain the world she once inhabited and to correct what she sees as its abiding injustices.

"Anybody with their eyes open who goes through the system understands [its unfairness]," said Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance, a New York-based group that advocates treatment rather than incarceration. "What's important is to have people speak out and become committed to reforming the system in the way that Kathie has."

A study that Kane-Willis and her colleagues are about to release shows that Illinois trails only Mississippi in the rate of imprisonment for drug possession -- about 60 inmates for every 100,000 residents -- and that the state locks up more than four blacks on drug charges for every white, the largest racial disparity in the nation.

She is hopeful, though, that things are changing. The number of people imprisoned for drug offenses in Illinois has declined since 2006, a promising though unexplained trend. Meanwhile, President Obama's drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske, is shunning the term "war on drugs," saying narcotics should be treated as a public health problem, not just a criminal one.

That helped convince Kane-Willis it was time to tell her story of addiction and recovery. She spoke for 10 minutes, concluding with the reflection that while she had been a junkie and a felon, she was now a wife, a mother, a friend, a teacher and an advocate.

How many others could redeem their lives with the same opportunities she had been given?

The room exploded in a standing ovation. After the hugs and tears, Kane-Willis said her fear had given way to liberation.

"If people want me to speak again, I would be happy to do that," she said. "I would be thrilled to do that."

6/13/09

Chicago Tribune


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-confession-bd-14-jun14,0,4399112.story
 
Last edited:
I don't see it happening in my lifetime. Everyone is too set in their ways. Drugs are regarded as the root of all evil, and any sort of lenience will just create more addicts (or so they think). Everyone who has never done drugs thinks they're the root of all evil and the people that have done them and advocate for legalization are disregarded.
 
I'll have to look for an article I read awhile back that really put into perspective why Central and Western Europe are so eager to implement harm reduction protocols and decriminalization/legalization studies/initiatives. The main reasons being scale and money; similar to the former Soviet Union. Neither the US or Russia are going to be quick to follow Europe- in Switzerland, Holland, etc hard drug addiction was/is the most expensive and serious public and social health problem. In the US/Russia, larger populations and land mass means the number of addicts and the costs of prohibition (diseases spread through dirty needles, costs of incarceration, ER visits/deaths, etc) are dispersed in a much more decentralized way; plus, other problems (car accidents, obesity, etc) cost more casualties and more money than addiction, and to top it all off, addicts are not as visible in the US as in Europe for the same land mass/population reasons.

So, no, we won't see a UK or Dutch style addiction treatment system in the US for a long, long time (if ever). Be thankful. Methadone and Buprenorphine maintenance are illegal in Russia (they aren't convinced MMT/BMT works 8)).

However, the recent change in tone with the drug war has caused many famous or influential people to speak out (hell, an article on Yahoo! News today is about Denzel Washington coming out about his teenage Heroin addiction).
 
I'll have to look for an article I read awhile back that really put into perspective why Central and Western Europe are so eager to implement harm reduction protocols and decriminalization/legalization studies/initiatives. The main reasons being scale and money; similar to the former Soviet Union. Neither the US or Russia are going to be quick to follow Europe- in Switzerland, Holland, etc hard drug addiction was/is the most expensive and serious public and social health problem. In the US/Russia, larger populations and land mass means the number of addicts and the costs of prohibition (diseases spread through dirty needles, costs of incarceration, ER visits/deaths, etc) are dispersed in a much more decentralized way; plus, other problems (car accidents, obesity, etc) cost more casualties and more money than addiction, and to top it all off, addicts are not as visible in the US as in Europe for the same land mass/population reasons.

So, no, we won't see a UK or Dutch style addiction treatment system in the US for a long, long time (if ever). Be thankful. Methadone and Buprenorphine maintenance are illegal in Russia (they aren't convinced MMT/BMT works 8)).

However, the recent change in tone with the drug war has caused many famous or influential people to speak out (hell, an article on Yahoo! News today is about Denzel Washington coming out about his teenage Heroin addiction).

This is pretty interesting. The United States puts up a lot of distractions to take away people's attention from the war on drugs, and people often ignore the more major and more pressing issues during election times here.

I didn't know Denzel Washington was a heroin addict, that's interesting. There are a lot of famous people who were addicted to heroin, and I knew not all of them were public about it. It's going to be interesting to see who comes out with their stories next.
 
Another pawn in the game per say. Just used to make innocent people that DO have addictions be labled as a drug user for life. Even if that person takes measures on their own to not be an addict. The US really sucks comparing to the UK as far as legitimacy goes.
 
Tchort: Denzel? No way!

Good article, I'm sure it'd be of interest to many in the research community.
 
In the US/Russia, larger populations and land mass means the number of addicts and the costs of prohibition (diseases spread through dirty needles, costs of incarceration, ER visits/deaths, etc) are dispersed in a much more decentralized way

Doesn't mean it's any less expensive to society. I would wager that if you take into account court costs, healthcare cost, lost productivity it would dwarf Swizerland, Germany, Netherlands, Denmark and all the European socially progressive nations.

The key word being PROgressive. Not REgressive like the U.S.

Therefore on the regressive basis I have to agree that you likely won't see a huge shift in social policy in the U.S. in my lifetime anyway IMO.
 
Honestly her story does nothing but encourage drug prohibition and treating adults like children, she became addicted to heroin and her life went out of control until she quit.

Just once I'd like someone famous to say yeah I used/use heroin and guess what it was no big deal, It didn't take over my life, I didn't become a prostitute, I managed to be successful etc.

These so called courageous stories of lack of self control might get more support for compassionate treatment of wealthy and white addicts in the legal system, but they don't help the real cause we should be fighting for which is legal access to all drugs by adults.
 
Good article, I'm sure it'd be of interest to many in the research community.

Yeah, it is. However...

Honestly her story does nothing but encourage drug prohibition and treating adults like children, she became addicted to heroin and her life went out of control until she quit.

garuda is right. Over here in Australia, we have certainly had people talking publicly about prior use or more usually, prior destructive use. What we don't talk about is current non-problematic 'recreational' drug use co-existing with the rest of our lives (talking here about researchers as well as other public figures).
 
Part of the problem is America's collective ego. Theoretically, life here should be as it is displayed in Norman Rockwell paintings, and if someone uses drugs it's "goddamn it what's wrong with you, it's so wonderful here and you're shooting smack!" So the idea is: someone shooting smack makes America less wonderful for everyone.

Drug use is an assault on America's image of its own success, which is illusory. Of course, getting drunk is okay because beer is a perfect fit to baseball.
 
Drug use is an assault on America's image of its own success, which is illusory. Of course, getting drunk is okay because beer is a perfect fit to baseball.


SOOO True!!!!!

However, Alcohol fuels most of the violent crime, from what the police in my city say.

I mentioned this in another post in a diff thread - a few years back the cheif of police in Ottawa Canada stated, when asked his opinion on the decriminalization of marijuana issue, that "if I could go back and re-write the laws, I would make alcohol ilegal and marijuana legal".

He went on to explain, that even when he started as a beat cop, the worst arrests involved persons that were drunk - they would resist, fight and cause all sorts of problems. Those persons who were high, were agreeable, reasonable and accepting of the situation. He said that the word from his officers was that things had not changed since.

I came to this forum because it is harm reduction centred. I don't believe in "the war on drugs" - it is yet another tool that the powers that be use in the marginalization of persons that are different from, or have different viewpoints than them. It has been very usefull to them in their war on minorities as well.

I am glad to see people speak out and admit their trials with addiction, who you would never think suffered from addictions in the first place.

Hopefully a trend is starting that will change the way we see addiction and even recreational drug use, goodness knows it is needed. The money and resourses that have been squandered on this "war" could be put to far better use, the child poverty rates in both the U.S. and Canada are a total disgrace!
 
People are animals, created to live in stable cycles. This one happens to include the shunning of use of certain substances. It will change, change happens regardless. Even if the sun dies and destoys humanity, I could go on
 
Top