I last scored brown in about October, and I know the gear was pretty decent then. Half a bag would generally put me in a very nice place indeed, at least until I started to smoke every day with predictable results on my tolerance. This was from a low-level dealer, far from me shopping at the junkie Harrods or anything like that.
I've said this before, but being a recreational user often puts you in a better position to comment on the quality of gear. I've scored with people who were addicts using on top of scripts and often in the past it's been absolute shite that I've struggled to get anything out of.
For them, though, it 'holds' them and maybe sedates them a bit more than what they're prescribed so they keep on buying. I'm not saying many addicts know nothing about gear; obviously they do by definition. Just that a man dying of thirst isn't going to complain that the glass of water you hand him is dirty and above room temperature, is he?
Then again, there is better stuff about. A lot of cutting still happens at street level, so there will naturally be small pockets of people with decent dealers (almost an oxymoron) who will more-or-less consistently get decent (and in the UK that's above 30% purity) gear. So to generalise about standards before the drought is ultimately a mistake, as it all depends on sources. As ever.
Now I can't speak for anything pre-1999 as that's when I had my first smoke, but I know there hasn't been a noticeable overall drop in quality since then. Fluctuations, yes, but a nosedive no. I'm also well aware that it's pretty absurd to make qualitative comparisons over such a long period of time because subjectivity and nostalgia cloud the issue somewhat.
Claiming to have '10/10' gear (or even worse, 'fire') is fucking ridiculous though, I'll give you that.
I've said this before, but being a recreational user often puts you in a better position to comment on the quality of gear. I've scored with people who were addicts using on top of scripts and often in the past it's been absolute shite that I've struggled to get anything out of.
For them, though, it 'holds' them and maybe sedates them a bit more than what they're prescribed so they keep on buying. I'm not saying many addicts know nothing about gear; obviously they do by definition. Just that a man dying of thirst isn't going to complain that the glass of water you hand him is dirty and above room temperature, is he?
Then again, there is better stuff about. A lot of cutting still happens at street level, so there will naturally be small pockets of people with decent dealers (almost an oxymoron) who will more-or-less consistently get decent (and in the UK that's above 30% purity) gear. So to generalise about standards before the drought is ultimately a mistake, as it all depends on sources. As ever.
Now I can't speak for anything pre-1999 as that's when I had my first smoke, but I know there hasn't been a noticeable overall drop in quality since then. Fluctuations, yes, but a nosedive no. I'm also well aware that it's pretty absurd to make qualitative comparisons over such a long period of time because subjectivity and nostalgia cloud the issue somewhat.
Claiming to have '10/10' gear (or even worse, 'fire') is fucking ridiculous though, I'll give you that.

Last edited: