citizen cained
Bluelighter
same with me bombed 100mg an hour and a half later nothing so bombed 150mg then half hour later "SMACK" like a ton of bricks.. was the best night of my life. 

I got it from a trustworthy source otherwise I would've never taken it in the first place. Obviously trustworthy sources aren't foolproof but I'm pretty damn sure it's MDMA.
Oh dear.
There is no such thing as a trustworthy source when it comes to dealing drugs.
And even if he was a tiny bit truistworthy, how do you know his hookup is trustworthy.
Buy and use a test kit so you dont become just another smuck who is sold bunk or worse........something that will kill you.
I appreciate the advice/concern, and I am all for caution and harm reduction when it comes to drug use, however I don't see how a test kit guarantees anything. Sure, if the stuff was totally bunk it would help, but in most cases at least a portion of the substance is going to be MDMA. It's the other portion you have to worry about. If I get a bag of molly cut with rat poison, a test kit won't help me any...that is unless I have an incorrect understanding of how test kits work.
LSDMDMA&8916486 said:you kidding?
most molly has MDMA in it?
where are you pulling THAT from?
im pretty sure most molly is relatively pure and a low amount, if any of inactive cut.
im pretty sure people dont cut molly to piss so itll pass a test but do nothing..
thats just a waste of MDMA..
LSDMDMA&8916486 said:you kidding?
most molly has MDMA in it?
where are you pulling THAT from?
im pretty sure most molly is relatively pure and a low amount, if any of inactive cut.
im pretty sure people dont cut molly to piss so itll pass a test but do nothing..
thats just a waste of MDMA..
I'm not trying to argue against the importance of harm reduction. I just question the actual effectiveness of a test kit in terms of reducing the danger of use. You guys make good points and I can see ways in which a test kit will be helpful. I will be using one in the future even if I know it doesn't guarantee anything, but after this experience and reading everyone's advice I figure it's better safe than sorry.Who said anything about guarantees? It's called harm reduction and this is a harm reduction forum, your choice buddy.
I'm not trying to argue against the importance of harm reduction. I just question the actual effectiveness of a test kit in terms of reducing the danger of use. You guys make good points and I can see ways in which a test kit will be helpful. I will be using one in the future even if I know it doesn't guarantee anything, but after this experience and reading everyone's advice I figure it's better safe than sorry.
I appreciate everyone sharing their opinion, and I don't intend to come off as promoting irresponsible usage in any way.