How long have you been seeing psychiatrists?
I guess I just feel pissed off because I've had bad experiences with several psychiatrists.
I've been seeing psychiatrists for 5 years. Some were bad, some were good, just like the various psychologists I've seen. They're only human, it's perfectly normal that you wouldn't connect with all of them. Maybe if you're having trouble with psychiatrists, try to see a psychologist instead. They have different methods of approach for sure.
I think they're real. But they're not understood well at this point in my opinion. People with these "illnesses" are treated like they're broken or something and I just don't agree with it. I don't like psychiatry, but I don't think it shouldn't exist. I just think it should be changed a lot. The main thing is the power they have to force people into taking drugs, and into hospital. That part of it's retarded.
I don't agree with that either, I just think you're over-simplifying it (sorry). As I said I've met some wonderful psychiatrists who treated me like a perfectly normal human being. I'm also currently seeing a psychologist who I'm pretty sure looks down on me because of my drug issues, so they can be just as bad. Psychiatry has actually been making tremendous improvements. If you think it's a bad field now, just look at how it was some thirty years ago when people were interned immediately and had no therapy whatsoever, just meds. It's improving extremely quickly.
It's also perfectly normal for them to be able to prescribe drugs as they are doctors after all and treat legitimate mental illnesses. Many of their patients need medical drugs to 'function' properly.
Mental illness is real and very serious no doubt, but the field of psychiatry is infected and irrevocably corrupted. Disband the entire field and let neurologists and psychologists handle the field of mental health. Or even start a new discipline to replace psychiatry. But the history of psychiatry, the status quo of the field as it exists today, is corrupt and dangerous.
Neurologists have no experience or training whatsoever in counselling. They work on physical problems; psychiatrists address those when there are some (as no physical cause has yet been found for many mental illnesses) but address the non-physical ones as well. And I mean yes the main difference is neurologists aren't counselors, quite frankly that'd be almost the same as sending someone to an oncologist for schizophrenia or something...
And psychologists are 1. not doctors so can't prescribe anything and 2. don't deal with illnesses as such. The way it's happened for me is I would see a therapist when I was feeling 'sad', 'down' etc and then when I started having chronic depression and a couple suicide attempts I was referred over to a psychiatrist. I was also referred to psychiatrists twice over the past few years due to PTSD. Psychiatrists will deal with illnesses such as schizophrenia/autism/depression etc. - psychologists are more just for when you're feelign down.
Psychiatry is basically the mixture of neurology and psychology so the 'new discipline to replace psychiatry' you're suggesting would literally become the exact same thing.
Sorry for being so vehement but psychiatry is really a field I hold close to my heart and I think it's a shame that it would be so grossly over-simplified.