in Australia, to become a clinical psychologist, you need at least 3 year degree with an APA approved major in psychology, followed by an honours year, followed by a 2 year masters of clinical psychology or 3 year Ph.D. Only a year or so more and you're a fully qualified Dr.
Correct.
I myself have
just started the quest towards this goal

But I'm doing it part-time, which means that it's 6 years to get the degree, then 1 year of honours, then 2 years of masters, then 1 year clinical experience work.
So that is literally
10 years until I'm a psychologist.
I.e. it's not just a certificate you can buy off the net and display in your office
Anyway, back on topic
Uhhhh.... I don't really understand your first paragraph. I'm not saying it's the psychiatrist's fault. I'm saying people are not educated well enough to understand that they don't have a mental disorder, or that their kids are just acting like kids and are not schizophrenic or bi-polar or attention deficit. But whatever.
My point is that pharma pays off doctors to prescribe their drug over other drugs, they give them dinners at seminars and hotel suites with all you can eat buffets and massage parlours. They also advertise on TV saying if you have these, these or these symptoms, get this drug, or "see you doctor" in Australia, since they can't market a drug directly.
So that's how we end up with people taking drugs that they don't need. Because this society thinks drugs are the only answer. A quick fix. When the simple fact is that drugs do nothing productive by themselves, not a single drug. The person needs to do some work too. Drugs just help. If you need them....
I definitely see your point, but I have to disagree.
Don't you think that if companies were allowed to market their anti-psychotic or anti-depressant medications on TV, that we would have a sharp increase in self-diagnosis, and therefore a sharp increase in unnecessary/over-medication??
It sounds like you or someone you know may have had a bad experience with a doctor prescribing you something you didn't need, but I've gotta say, doctors like that would be the vast minority.
The majority of them make the best diagnosis within their knowledge and means. If someone is misdiagnosed, I would imagine that most of the time that could be attributed to a lack of information given to the doctor, a lack of knowledge on the doctor's part about that particular condition (totally the doctor's fault, they should keep on top of new/breakthrough information), or simply because of the ambiguity of so many psychological disorders.
Also, I think if you actually speak to a lot of medical professionals, they will tell you that the pharmaceutical companies bribery methods of "wining and dining" their clients can actually
deter them from prescribing their products a lof of the time. A lot of doctors prefer to make their own educated choices about the meds and brands that they are going to recommend. And anyway, a lot of the time the wining and dining occurs for products that have direct competitors, e.g. a brand-name medication and it's generic brand, i.e. exactly the same drug but a different company. This doesn't actually promote the doctor to prescribe MORE of that drug, just to go with one company's product or the other.
Although I can totally understand how it could be misconstrued that they're bribing the doctors to prescribe their drugs more often than necessary.