xdrc
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2022
- Messages
- 161
There is an experienced clandestine analytic chemist on DMT-Nexus (and related websites) who did experiments with spiking ps. cubensis substrate with 5-MeO-DMT. I think he was mostly doing work with HPLC-MS or GC-MS, but I don't remember and can't find his posts now. Apparently, Hamilton Morris also talked in his Patreon podcast about having been given a sample of that church, and finding no 5-MeO-4-HO-DMT. It has to be said that currently no analytical sample of that compound exists, last being made in France in 1965 or so (I think the paper has never made it to the digital age, but if someone may try to access it: Julia M, Manoury P, Voillaume MC (1965). "[No 209 - Recherches en série indolique. XIV (*) - Sur des méthoxy-5 hydroxy-4, méthoxy-5 hydroxy-6 et méthoxy-7 hydroxy-6 tryptamines]". Bull Chim Soc Fr (in French): 1417–23), so it is going to be rather hard to proof existence/non-existence of that compound without isolating it and completely characterising the structure. I was given to understand by Dirk Hoffmeister that PsiH (the 4-hydroxylating enzyme in ps. cubensis) is not yet understood enough as to give predictions whether or not 4-hydroxylation with 5-methoxy substitution is feasible or not. Note that their group did work on 5-Methylpsilocybin, but making 5-Methylpsilocin synthetically and only using the phosphorylation enzyme.
I think there is legitimate doubts to have about the church of psilomethoxin. Their claims are entirely based on bioassays, mostly in microdosed quantities. Placebo is real.
I think there is legitimate doubts to have about the church of psilomethoxin. Their claims are entirely based on bioassays, mostly in microdosed quantities. Placebo is real.