Prohibition fuels firestorm of new dangerous drugs

7zark7

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Jun 7, 2004
Messages
2,559
Location
UK
[size=+1]Prohibition fuels firestorm of new dangerous drugs[/size]
Thursday 10th November 2011, 12:40am
If moonshine was legalised, demand would be dulled
CHRIS SNOWDON


IN THE restless pursuit of pleasure, human beings will try almost any substance when circumstances require. During prohibition, Americans resorted to drinking toxic moonshine and inhaling ether. Second-rate substitutes and legal highs are seldom as pleasant as the real thing and are sometimes more dangerous, but at least you don’t have to worry about getting arrested.

The designer drugs that have swept Europe in the last two decades are the modern equivalent of moonshine, aided by the growth of the internet and the waning purity of ecstasy pills. Between 2003 and 2008, the MDMA content of ecstasy fell from 67 per cent to 33 per cent at a time when illicit chemists were synthesising dozens of new recreational substances. Ketamine, GHB, GBL, BZP and mephedrone all generated their own minor moral panics and were banned, only to be replaced by the likes of naphyrone, MDAI and Ivory Wave. More will follow. Twenty-four new legal highs were synthesised in 2009, with a further thirty-three appearing in 2010.

Although billed as “party drugs”, these chemicals often have little in common. Clubbers might use them interchangeably but mephedrone (Meow Meow) and BZP are stimulants, while GHB and ketamine are heavy sedatives. Different in nature and unpredictable in potency, users are vulnerable to overdose. Naphyrone (NRG-1) is active at just 20 milligrams while mephedrone is active at 200 milligrams. Since naphyrone was touted as “the new Meow Meow” when it appeared in 2010, users were liable to take ten times the “safe” dose. Some did.


Full article: http://www.cityam.com/forum/prohibition-fuels-firestorm-new-dangerous-drugs
 
hahaha. No shit. My argument for years. The only sensible harm reduction here is to legalise with various elements of restriction/control. It needs to be highly regulated for public safety and discussed openly. Otherwise, more bad drugs appear.

I suggest anyone read "The Pursuit of Oblivion". A good historical context of recreational drug use. The argument is simply that prohibition makes drugs more unsafe and that it is part of the human condition to alter one's state of mind. To be fair, done in moderation and in the proper context, drugs have have very positive effects. Consider American Indian Shamanism.
 
I don't like their assertion that moonshine is dangerous, but other than that they're spot on.

I'm from Appalachia originally though, so maybe I'm biased but I like moonshine and it's still very commonly brewed there. If done right moonshine is more pleasant to drink than most other kinds of booze. And damn can you get trashed on it. Moonshine didn't start or end with prohibition.

A better comparison would be the fact that during prohibition it was common for people to drink ethyl alcohol that had been diluted with another, not safe to drink alcohol like methanol.
 
I don't like their assertion that moonshine is dangerous, but other than that they're spot on.

I'm from Appalachia originally though, so maybe I'm biased but I like moonshine and it's still very commonly brewed there. If done right moonshine is more pleasant to drink than most other kinds of booze. And damn can you get trashed on it. Moonshine didn't start or end with prohibition.

A better comparison would be the fact that during prohibition it was common for people to drink ethyl alcohol that had been diluted with another, not safe to drink alcohol like methanol.

They may be referring the things like as well.
 
Top