MedicinalUser247
Music Ambassador
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2023
- Messages
- 4,746
I believe it's good to experiment with Psychedelic drugs even if it's just once.
I completely agree.Yes @Neuroprotection I think we've passed peak psychedelic-exuberance, thank god. It has been a bit cringey lately to observe the mass bandwagon effect, people jumping on everything from microdosing to fix your life, to psychedelics on the stock market. A lot psychedelic virtue signaling on social media etc.
I mean, I'm a psychedelic exuberant to the core, and I think a lot of people here are, but at the same time we need to recognize the limitations and dangers, which gratefully I think a lot of people on this forum have the maturity to recognize. We were tripping before the wave, we'll be tripping long after.
i think it can cause some people to have memories that aren't real, and that can sometimes really mess up a person's life... this is an article that goes back and forth about whether or not people are revealing past trauma or fabricating memories, doesn't really seem to go any where https://bigthink.com/neuropsych/hidden-trauma-do-psychedelics-reveal-memories-or-create-fake-ones/ people on blue light have commented some of my links aren't scientific enough. that's probably one of them.I truly believe everyone should take a heroic dose at least once in their life.
It helps you grow psychologically.
what harm would you say they caused in your life or others you've known of if you don't mind me asking?Later on I learned they are not harmless.
Caffeine is also a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, so cyclic AMP produced by any other Gs coupled neurotransmitter receptor (D1 dopamine receptors for example), will not be broken down, and the signal from that receptor will be amplified.Caffeine doesn't act on the dopamine pathways afaik, it's an adenosine atagonist.
I think nicotine does interact with the dopamine system however, but I'm a bit fuzzy on that.
For all of you who have tried both stimulants or opioids and psychedelics, I recommend taking a minute to imagine The experience of each drug. try to compare them side-by-side with a strong focus on how they affect your consciousness/connectedness to the universe, nature and people ETC.
I haven't used opioids much at all. I'm very averse to them, philosophically and physically. The few times I've had codeine or other medical opioids they make me feel shitty and drugged in a bad way. So I can't really compare opioids and psychedelics in a fair way. But I'm going to anyways since we're in the business of yakking about drugs around here.
My gut feeling is that yes, they are opposed to one another, but not in a way where you can map them on opposite ends of a single spectrum, but in a way where they occupy different terrains that have little in common and can't be fully occupied at the same time. So rather than two ends of a see-saw, they're more like Switzerland and Azerbaijan.
As for stimulants and psychedelics, maybe a bit more possible to put them on a continuum - but rather than a linear space, I see it as more of a multidimensional space with vectors pointing off in different non-opposite directions. Imagine a 3-D space with two arrows, both anchored at the (0,0,0) origin but the arrows pointing off on different directions in that space.
I think the deepest psychedelic headspaces ask for stillness and settling in and are perturbed by stimulation. Yet many psychedelics can also be stimulating - but in a very different way from caffeine that's for sure, maybe more like amphetamines but also unique. And a psychedelic trip can move from sedentary to stimulation and back again. Like a lot of things with psychedelics, its complex, fractal, and hard to pin down. But fun to contemplate.
I don't think that's a point of contention at all. In fact, providing a challenge to the stability of one's psyche is a quintessential element of many psychedelics. For many people, that's precisely the point.
Animals reinforce cognitive habits, habits, perspectives, and behaviors as we age. Sometimes those are helpful, sometimes they aren't. Psychedelics like psilocybin that are known for their ability to soften those patterns and provide new perspectives can be valuable for people that are stuck in unhealthy cognitive/emotional patterns. When addiction, depression, PTSD, or end of life anxiety are diminishing quality of life, many people have found value in shaking themselves out of the mental ruts that are causing them distress.
I'm not arguing that anyone should explore psychedelics, but I think it's important to recognize why many people have benefited from them despite some of the legitimate risks that you mentioned. It's a cost-benefit analysis
I dislike that psychedelics are being pushed as 'cures' for depression. Or cures for "addiction".
While I think they can be helpful tools for some one with depression, no amount of tripping has ever "cured" or "fixed" any of my depressive symptoms (low to no energy, no motivation, no pleasure in life, flat-affected demeanor, feeling pointless, etc..). They always return within a few days of tripping for me.
No amount of trips has ever made me stop craving & desiring opioids either.
So I think it's disingenuous to get people to believe they'll be "cured" or "fixed" just by going on a trip. However, I'm totally all for them being recognized as medicines & being somewhat legalized so people can use & access them. Although typically when these kinds of drugs do get "legalized" for medicinal use, they still make it hard to access them unless you're rich, but that's another story.
I've been on that boat for some time, never fell into the camp that thinks that psychadelics fix everything and everyone needs to do them and if you haven't then your mind isn't opened or whatever.I completely agree.
I've always been fascinated with psychedelics, but learned early on they are not magical. Later on I learned they are not harmless. Eventually I came to the bittersweet conclusion that they are really just another drug.
They aren't some magic cure to anything, they aren't some portal to higher consciousness (but they can be), they are not anything other than a chemical that alters your brain.
I dislike that psychedelics are being pushed as 'cures' for depression. Or cures for "addiction".
While I think they can be helpful tools for some one with depression, no amount of tripping has ever "cured" or "fixed" any of my depressive symptoms (low to no energy, no motivation, no pleasure in life, flat-affected demeanor, feeling pointless, etc..). They always return within a few days of tripping for me.
No amount of trips has ever made me stop craving & desiring opioids either.
So I think it's disingenuous to get people to believe they'll be "cured" or "fixed" just by going on a trip. However, I'm totally all for them being recognized as medicines & being somewhat legalized so people can use & access them. Although typically when these kinds of drugs do get "legalized" for medicinal use, they still make it hard to access them unless you're rich, but that's another story.
Totally agree with this.
I inadvertently got mixed up with the new analogue of fentanyl. Really, really bad stuff. I tried and tried to stop and taper, but this stuff is absolute poison and I couldn’t get my brain on the right track to make that change. I finally became so fed up, I dosed myself for 24 hours with psilocybin and it was enough to break me out of that head space. Probably saved my life. Still working on getting off of opiates, though, and may consider ibogaine treatment in the future. I think when you’re facing such tremendous threats against your life, this precise paradigm shift is absolutely warranted and benefits outweigh risk.
While I don't want to neglect personal differences that essentially define the experience and "habit", this I have been thinking about lately; Statistically you take risk when you indulge in any new drug. People have inbuilt grandiosity and think they can fare without developing addiction and other issues that could realistically happen. In that sense, psychedelics are not particularly bad. But doing psychedelics reels that delusion, one kinda accepts they won't have control. So it might instinctually seem more hazard because you probably have less steps to coming up with issues of the drug, while most other drugs might take longer with that, but might lead there more likely while imagining being in control.but for me the risk is just too great.
While I don't want to neglect personal differences that essentially define the experience and "habit", this I have been thinking about lately; Statistically you take risk when you indulge in any new drug. People have inbuilt grandiosity and think they can fare without developing addiction and other issues that could realistically happen. In that sense, psychedelics are not particularly bad. But doing psychedelics reels that delusion, one kinda accepts they won't have control. So it might instinctually seem more hazard because you probably have less steps to coming up with issues of the drug, while most other drugs might take longer with that, but might lead there more likely while imagining being in control.
I wish you understand what I am trying to say.
they do, it is just bit more subtle.although they don’t possess any hallucinogenic/psychedelic effects