I don't believe in ghosts and goblins, but I wouldn't say my psychedelic use is strictly recreational. I use such chemicals mostly as tools of introspection. It just so happens that when I do so, I don't imagine Gods and sorcery, but rather I contemplate humanity and human empathy - particularly my own place within the societal structure.
So, as a naturalist who happens to not be a nihilist, there is no option on this poll that suits me.
I think that the best-known psychedelic proponents who went nuts and became pseudo-gurus (Leary, Alpert, McKenna, etc) have been the most damaging to the public image of psychedelic drug use. Authors like Shulgin and Huxley are to most young readers not nearly as exciting as stories of taking drugs and suddenly entering a world of magic, aliens, Gods, etc, but for many grown-ups, they are a wonderful breath of clean air within an arrogant, new age stench of childish nonsense.
Think about it. A "square", so to speak (a middle-aged adult who does not take drugs) watches his daughter take a tryptamine. Next, he sees her giggling. Finally, he hears her say, "Oh my God, Daddy... I see now that I am an important part of the eternal oneness of the mystical muffin. It's SO clear now! EVERYONE should take these drugs!"
Of COURSE Dad's going to look upon such "revelations" as proof that "those horrible drugs make you crazy!"
Peacelove,
Aldousage