• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: tryptakid | Foreigner

pizzagate

Status
Not open for further replies.
Someone that covers for pedophiles, human traffickers and child abusers is attempting to lecture me on grammar

Please.
 
This is all so obviously true, the more research I do the more obvious it is.... it is in plain site,they are not even doing a good job of hiding it......

What I wonder is how dark it actually is.... do they just trade child porn? Or sex victims? Or do they actually kill some of these kids for fun or ritual? It's like these sick secrets bind them and to be a part of the power you have to partake in some form of pedophilia .....

The people who are supposed to be enforcing these child trafficking laws actually are a part of it.... which is interesting because I was reading about Chester Bennington and how his father was a law enforcement officer specially geared towards child sexual trafficking.... so probably connected with the podestas , and probably adopted John Podestdas bastard son Chester .... they are identical....

Even that name Podesta , sounds a lot like Pedo .... and alefantis French for L'enfantis infant or young boy
 
Liquid, you did not write "for eg". Seriously?
You need to learn some things (e.g., grammar, manners, and choosing places to read and learn as opposed to regurgitate).

The abbreviation e.g. is from the Latin exemplī grātiā. It is used with parentheses and a comma afterwards. It is a non-exhaustive list of examples. The phrase means "for example" or "such as".

Totally lame criticism there. Focus on the arguments, not the superficial stuff please.
 
Reporter who exposed BBC pedophilia cover-up 'drops dead'

Liz MacKean, the former British investigative reporter who exposed Jimmy Savile and the culture of pedophile protection at the BBC, has been found dead. She was 52.

MacKean worked at the BBC until she quit in 2013 after executives decided to ban her groundbreaking and brave investigation into predatory pedophile Jimmy Savile in order to protect him and other pedophiles.
 
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-40981585

Strangling? You made me look. Nothing about a strangling. Did you reject the story cause of the source? BBC covered it too and the news doesn't contradict anything in the above article. BBC of course doesn't admit just how much they fought her disclosures, but they do acknowledge the content of said disclosures.
 
I know it doesn't contradict. Except for the strongly implied foul play in the SOTT article.

Why do you think I "rejected" anything? I want to know why the BBC waited four years to "off" her. Is that a better euphemism?
 
There is always this conspiracy subtext in Liquid Methods posts. :\ I guess its red herrings with my hyperbole for tea.

Why did the BBC wait four years to strangle her?

After she had exposed this and the saville affair is well and truly public knowledge? What point could this serve?

Furthermore, Saville's proclivities towards children were basically well known well before his death and subsequent exposure.


And this has fucking nothing to do with "pizzagate". Thread is an inch from death.

Who will save it?
 
Yeah, but the point is there are pedophiles in the highest levels of governments, and the media protects them.

THat's why they offed the reporter. And why it was published that way. Couldn't say it too boldly, that's dangerous.
 
I don't know you all well enough to get the subtleties of your sarcasm, I thought you were rejecting the story as a conspiracy which is what many posters believe about anything related to pizzagate. Odd however how many persistently reported conspiracies turn out to be true. That said, conspiratorial reporting is an obnoxious reporting style. The whole disinformation reporting is a counter-tactic to this. You get reporting of things that are intentionally bogus. Flat-earth style news stories. People feel hurt when they realized they were duped and then throw out the baby with the bathwater and go back to suck on CNN's tit. Most of it is toxic hyperbole intended to keep us glued to the next "Breaking News" and some of it is just plain out lies if they can get away with it. Of course the most damaging thing about mainstream news is what doesn't get reported. What doesn't make the cut. Sad state of affairs. Whatever, my rant about news in general. Fucking pizza, they done ruined that too.
 
^this guy gets it.

Scrofula you missed the point entirely as you always do. Is it a conspiracy that the BBC covered up for a notorious pedophile for decades? One with close ties to the Royal Family.
 
Really levels (and only levels)? Which conspiracy theories have turned into actual conspiracies as accepted by many average people?

I ate a lot of pizza today with gusto... that's all... I love pizza.

First of all, was the woman a mother of nine young children? The ultimate revenge would be to shove the cyanide capsule into her mouth and tell her that her children were going to Haiti. Or Mars. All while holding their breath for two minutes, something all Russian agents must be able to do routinely.

An untold tragedy unfolds. We'll never see those nine children again.

Yet another mystery solved. Next!
 
Not so much a conspiracy theory, but the Snowden leaks indicate a certain conspiracy I don't think anyone would have believed without hard proof. Which is the key difference. :\
 
cduggles said:
Which conspiracy theories have turned into actual conspiracies as accepted by many average people?

cduggles said:
First of all, was the woman a mother of nine young children? The ultimate revenge would be to shove the cyanide capsule into her mouth and tell her that her children were going to Haiti. Or Mars. All while holding their breath for two minutes, something all Russian agents must be able to do routinely

wow dude, if that's what you got out of this news story then I have a feeling I'd be wasting my time trying to make a sound argument with you. It's comments like that this woman likely fought her whole life against. Strange you would be so quick to side with pedophiles. Anyways, even if I went out of my way to show you how 20 years ago news stories we now take for granted (thanks to things like the Snowden disclosures as swilow pointed out) would have fallen squarely in the domain of conspiracy theories and have been maliciously ridiculed you'd likely spout something really insulting and shrug it off. Not to be elitist but the average person is not a good yardstick for what passes as good news. Have you ever looked at surveys of what the average person believes?
 
She's a chick, doesn't like "dude". Be careful.

And liquid, shit, even when I agree with you, you don't seem to get it.

levels said:
Not to be elitist but the average person is not a good yardstick for what passes as good news. Have you ever looked at surveys of what the average person believes?

Sure, but the problem is all those sites with stories written by the average person. You can just sign up to be an editor, no CV necessary. Have you looked at surveys of what they believe?
 
levels said:
Strange you would be so quick to side with pedophiles.

Nobody is siding with paedophiles - that's a very emotive (mis)characterisation.
The problem with circumstantial evidence is that it doesn't prove anything. that's why it isn't enough to convict someone in a court of law.
Libel is definitely illegal though, and accusing people of something as serious as kidnapping and child sex slavery could certainly be considered that, if it cannot be proven.

levels said:
Not to be elitist but the average person is not a good yardstick for what passes as good news. Have you ever looked at surveys of what the average person believes?
i don't know about "the average person", but a lot of law hinges on what "a reasonable person" may be inclined at accept or understand.
That seems like a far more appropriate term, to me.
 
Well, fine there is a bit of emotion, but not sure what to call it then if it's a mischaracterization. We're talking about someone who spent their life exposing pedophilia rings in high places — and got attacked for it nonstop — and died of a stroke. I don't live on a planet where joking about poisoning a person who just died to make a non-existent point is funny. Pedophilia has been used to fuck innocent people over. It's like calling someone a Nazi. People use it to slander a person all the time. I'm aware of these realities. I didn't accuse anyone here of being a pedophile for the record. I dislike however that any evidence presented relating to pedophilia in society is met with an uproar of disparaging comments. To be that jaded in the face of a reasonable argument, well, to me that is being supportive of the pedophile agenda however indirectly. It's a strange knee jerk reaction to me and I'm not sorry for saying it.
 
I dislike however that any evidence presented relating to pedophilia in society is met with an uproar of disparaging comments. To be that jaded in the face of a reasonable argument, well, to me that is being supportive of the pedophile agenda however indirectly. It's a strange knee jerk reaction to me and I'm not sorry for saying it.

Seems to me that a reasoned uproar is appropriate with evidence of child molestation. You can ask Catholic priests and Michael Jackson's ghost what they think about how the media covers it up.

Do you mean disparaging comments society makes about your misunderstanding of a 4chan joke? Those too are appropriate, at least some of them.

Why? Because it was a 4chan joke.
 
Stillwater mayor caught with child pornography, troopers said
I believe this is the 4th mayor busted for child pornography/pedophilia since Trump has attained office.
The continuation of busting pedophiles and child traffickers is the true draining of the swamp.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We are all aware that pedophiles groom children, but here is a look at how exactly they go about it.
This is a book called Secret Pizza Party. Read it and tell me it is not suspicious. (Would you buy it for your or your friend's children?)

Now what is extremely concerning is that NYC mayor Bill de Blasio actually read this book publicly to children! WTF...

This may appear as harmless to the ignorant, but when you realize that the president of the Manhattan Young Democrats, the downstate region vice president of the New York State Young Democrats and de Blasio administration employee has a secret taste for sickening kiddie porn that involves baby girls as young as 6 months old, the story becomes very compelling.

Jacob Schwartz, 29, was busted for allegedly keeping more than 3,000 disgusting images and 89 videos on a laptop after downloading the filth from the internet.

The illegal smut shows “young nude females between the approximate ages of 6 months and 16, engaging in sexual conduct… on an adult male,” court papers say.
Didn't hear about this in the mainstream media? It was unsurprisingly under-reported, as these increasingly common pedo busts have all been. Wouldn't these stories get great ratings? What are they trying to hide and why?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top