Thankyou for your explanation and dialog, it's a much more productive and civil way to deal with a problem than just brushing it under the rug.
Check your PMs before getting on your high horse... actually since you've been so kind as to repost this and drag the whole thing out I might as well forward your message here
Just read my first post in this thread, and think how much better this thread wouldve been if moderators hadnt said anything - there wouldve been no problems at all and moderators wouldnt have made themselves seem like government law enforcers. This thread was pointlessly over-moderated to the point of censorship, it's that simple. I just asked a simple request for information on one pill, that's all. You chose to drag this out and turn it into an episode, not me, Im just after information.
From your privmsg (nothing personal in it so ok to post) ...
You're not being singled out. Almost all of the pill info requests that come in consisting only of a name/logo are denied. You'll notice if you look around (and read the Posting Guidelines) that pill info requests on THIS forum require details, lots of them. Like speckles, colouring, logo, press, bevel, score, the whole 9 yards.
Sorry but the reality is that in many cases unless you have physical access to the pill then all you will probably know is 1) name, 2) logo, 3) location, 4) color. Although that isn't enough info to make a post to New Scientist it is certainly more than enough info to request further information in case anybody knows anything. This forum is just a GUIDE anyway where everyone has to make their own educated decisions about the information they find, as to whether said info is valid, invalid, useful, useless, harmful, harmless, or otherwise. I'm not after a scientific analysis of the pill, just information - any information.
Like I said I've already read the various incarnations of those guidelines over the years, but it is an absolutely ridiculous requirement that you must first virtually know everything about a pill before being able to request information. Clearly I'm requesting information because I _don't_ know everything about the pill. If I DO have more information then yes I do provide all that and more - here's an
example post, with scan photo, weight, and Marquis test results included. Unfortunately in this case I don't have such information, which is why Im the one doing the requesting rather than the sharing this time.
Guidelines are just that - they are not laws, and your role here is that of a moderator - not a censor. Clearly I am not a troll or anybody causing problems or using abusive language (or anything else worthy of censorship), I am simply asking for information as many have done before me. Moderating is not your fulltime job so stop taking it so seriously and lets try and maintain the relatively friendly and useful nature of this place where information can flow freely, and without treating posters who simply request information like schoolboys who've broken the law.
Conclusion: As much as I hate to say it this forum IS unfortunately _useless_ for pill requests unless you know virtually everything about the pill beforehand. That has now been proven. Dont get me wrong, this forum is a good resource for most other things, just not pill requests unless virtually everything is already known anyway (which basically defeats the purpose of requesting more info). Some (hopefully not all) moderators have shown that they consider specific details on a pill to be more important than any information about a pill - clearly they would rather my friend blindly gamble on whether he consumes this pill, rather than being allowed any potential information about it.
Given the stance of the moderator involved I've removed for now my
test results of Marquis Simons and Robadope vs. 2C-T-2, 2C-T-21, 2C-E, 2C-I, 2C-C, 2C-D, 2C-P, IAP, BDB, DPT Hcl, 5-MEO-DALT, 4-HO-MIPT, 4-ACO-DIPT, 5-MEO-DMT, Harmine Hcl, Harmaline Hcl, and several non-active substances. It was the first time many of those substances have been tested and results published, so clearly that is even more "potentially harmful" than replies to a simple pill request.
But one last note -
at the end of the day, all posts made at this forum can be potentially harmful or misleading - just because somebody posts the height and width of a pill doesnt make the information any more safe, so censoring such information (even before its posted) is counter-productive and clearly not in anybodys interests. It is obviously impossible for even the best moderators to prevent potentially dangerous information from being posted, so all of us must make our own decisions about whether or not information may be misleading or potentially dangerous.
Peace.
PS. "The Mondays", no ... the moderator had a touch of "The Mondays" on Saturday which sent this whole thread downhill in the first place ...