Pharmacist Faces Murder Charge In Shooting

GolfR32

Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
113
Location
315, 714, 949, 805
http://newsok.com/oklahoma-city-pharmacist-faces-murder-charge-in-shooting/article/3372941?custom_click=masthead_topten

I don't think they know if it was directly drug related or if it was money they were after. But either way, the movie plays like a scene straight out of American History X.

There is a video of the incident in the link.

"An Oklahoma City pharmacist was charged today with first-degree murder in the May 19 shooting death of a would-be robber.

Chickasha resident Jerome Ersland, 57, surrendered about noon, his attorney, Irven Box, said. He is being held without bail in the Oklahoma County Jail.
Box thinks a jury will exonerate Ersland.

The charge alleges Ersland shot Antwun Parker, 16, while he was incapacitated and lying on his back. Ersland’s account of the incident doesn’t match the video or the evidence collected at the scene, according to the affidavit written by Oklahoma City Police Detective David Jacobson.

Parker was shot once in the head and five times in the stomach area. The autopsy found Parker was still alive after the head shot and died from the stomach wounds.
Oklahoma County District Attorney David Prater discussed the case at an afternoon press conference.

Ersland has maintained he acted in self defense when he shot Parker to foil the robbery attempt.

He said two men in ski masks threatened him and two other employees when they burst into Reliable Discount Pharmacy, near SW 59 and Pennsylvania, demanding cash and drugs.

Ersland, a disabled Army veteran, could not flee like the two women working with him, so he reached for the semiautomatic pistol in his pocket, he said when he recounted the incident for The Oklahoman last week.

Ersland said he shot one of the robbers in the head then grabbed a second gun to pursue the other robber.
The injured teen was trying to get up, Ersland said, so he emptied his gun into the would-be robber’s chest.
The other robber and getaway driver drove away before Ersland could reach them, he said.
Police have not identified anyone else involved in the robbery attempt, but the investigation is ongoing."
 
The charge alleges Ersland shot Antwun Parker, 16, while he was incapacitated and lying on his back. Ersland’s account of the incident doesn’t match the video or the evidence collected at the scene, according to the affidavit written by Oklahoma City Police Detective David Jacobson.
If that's true, he deserves the charge. Sad.
 
Well, but further on, it says that the guy was trying to get up. Now, I don't know if he was armed or had a gun nearby, but if I even thought there was a chance the bastard was going for a gun, I would have done the same.

My opinion- as a gun owner and collector- may be different than many. Few birthdays or christmasses past that I don't get at least one pistol or rifle (I actual prefer shotguns, doubles, but I don't complain). I think the next gun I get will either be a Kahr PM9 or the Taurus model that looks just like it if it shoots well- for a 400 dollar savings. Something small and compact for concealed carry, but easy enough for my wife to operate at night if she needed to.
 
I think its absurd that we put people in jail for killing robbers, even if they were already hit. The cops have no qualms about shooting a suspect 19 times and going on there merry way but when someone who's life and business is threated kills it becomes murder.
 
I hope he lives out the rest of his days in jail and dies there. I bet he thinks he deserves a medal for this.

I feel for the boys family.
 
From what I saw on the video, the kid was brandishing a pair of guns in his face. As far as I am concerned, all bets are off.
 
Last edited:
If the "kid" will put a gun to someone and possibly use it, the pharmacist has every right to splatter his brains across the counter. I hope the pharmacist gets off scot-free.

P.S. The article links to a poll regarding the charges on the pharmacist.
 
If he was going to hurt anyone he would have.

Retail robberies are simple. Give it up. They leave. No one gets hurt.

Murdering children in cold blood (which is what he did, it wasn't in defense of himself or anyone else) is inexcusable.
 
I would hardly consider someone riding around with older people brandishing guns in people's faces and (attempting) to take people's money a child. Children are innocent and loving beings; this guy was just a bastard. He got what he deserved. Had I been in the pharmacist's shoes, I too would have blown him away. If you shove a gun in my face, don't expect mercy.
 
That was overkill. He did not need to KILL THEM. He could have had them taken to the hospital after the first shot or so, whatever incapacitated them...and then they would have stood trial, gotten convicted and served their time with some nice scars.

He is an idiot and deserves to rot.
 
^word

"If he was going to hurt anyone he would have.

Retail robberies are simple. Give it up. They leave. No one gets hurt.

Murdering children in cold blood (which is what he did, it wasn't in defense of himself or anyone else) is inexcusable. "

my thoughts exactly, I feel for the kids family, if he was going to shoot the pharmacist he would have.
 
As much as I feel sorry for the kid getting popped....I don't think the pharmacist dude should be getting charged. I mean he was trying to protect himself from another gun being potentially shot at him.
 
The charge alleges Ersland shot Antwun Parker, 16, while he was incapacitated and lying on his back. Ersland’s account of the incident doesn’t match the video or the evidence collected at the scene, according to the affidavit written by Oklahoma City Police Detective David Jacobson.
Obviously most of us know that we have to take such accounts with a grain of salt. If there's any community that has experienced the fucked up side of LE, it would be ours. But, at the moment, this is all we have to go on. Speculating on what actually happened doesn't make much sense.
 
Murdering children in cold blood (which is what he did, it wasn't in defense of himself or anyone else) is inexcusable.

Who murdered a child in cold blood, sir? This "kid" along with another kid were wearing ski masks and were ARMED. Plus, if anyone saw O'Reilly Factor last night (yeah, I'm sure everyone on BL has it set on their TiVo), the pharmacist has had many surgeries to his back (had a very cumbersome backbrace on during the interview) and felt handicapped and threatened. Honestly, the pharmacist sounded as if he may have had some type of mental impairment (very strange speech patterns) and could have overreacted because of his handicap. These little thugs got just what they deserved in any event.
 
If that's true, he deserves the charge. Sad.
it was a hugely intense/adrenalined/emotional situation where your life is threatened and you have to think fast. i think most of us could have shot off a couple more shots due to nerves

if it was out of anger, though, that's a different story i suppose
 
To all the idiots defending the robber, yeah he was a kid, he still tried to rob the store so he got what was coming. If the kid didn't want to get shot, well he shouldn't have gone around waving guns. And if it was me i'd make sure the fucker was dead as well.
 
To all the idiots defending the robber, yeah he was a kid, he still tried to rob the store so he got what was coming. If the kid didn't want to get shot, well he shouldn't have gone around waving guns. And if it was me i'd make sure the fucker was dead as well.

Self defense was the first shot that incapacitated the kid. Premeditated murder occured with the last several shots (which proved fatal)- as intent was formed when he retrieved the other gun, walked up to him, pointed the gun inches away from a kid on the ground and let loose 5 (?) shots.

The law is clear.

If you did this in the USA, you too would be facing 1st degree murder charges like this guy. I bet the law is more stringent in the UK given the lack of a 2nd amendment type law concerning private ownership of firearms.
 
This all happened in like 45 seconds. I don't blame the pharmacist whatsoever. He was trying to protect himself and his employees and had every right to do so. And like I said, the fucking pharmacist was handicapped. He couldn't protect himself if the "child" had gotten up and taken a shot at him. I would have made sure the little fucker was dead myself.
 
Ersland felled Parker with a gunshot to the head, then chased the other robber outside, according to surveillance video released by Oklahoma County prosecutors. He retrieved another gun from a locked drawer after re-entering the store and shot Parker five more times. Prosecutors contend there was no reason to shoot the teen again because he was unarmed and incapacitated.
Link

Prosecutors allege physical evidence proves Parker was unarmed, unconscious and on his back when the pharmacist shot him five times in the abdomen. They allege Parker already was incapacitated because Ersland had shot him in the head.

The video showed Ersland first shot Parker as Parker pulled on a ski mask. The pharmacist then chased an armed robber out of the store, returned to get a second gun and shot Parker again.

Links to other articles from the same source.


Seems like the consensus is that the teen was unconscious after the first head shot. The pharmacist then goes back and gets a higher caliber weapon, and shoots him five times while he's seemingly unconscious on the floor.

i think most of us could have shot off a couple more shots due to nerves
I don't think most of us would have shot him 5 more times, let alone go and exchange weapons to do so. ( I realize you didn't know about the weapon exchange. :) )
 
Top