footscrazy
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,476
Petrol sniffing is deemed to be a serious problem in several Indigenous communities. Stats (which should be taken with a grain of salt) suggest that over 100 Indigenous people across Australia have died across Australia 1981 to 2003 from petrol sniffing; rates of up to 70% of the under 25 population sniffing have also been reported in some communities.
As a measure to try and deal with the problem, the reportedly unsinffable petrol 'Opal' was introduced in 2005. This low-aromatic fuel is subsidised by the government so that it's the same price as normal unleaded fuel, but the switch to sell it is voluntary.
Opal is claimed to have slashed snffing rates, but its not a perfect solution. Opal fuel can still be sniffed, especially with some modifications, and in April 2007 a boy died after sniffing it. Also, some roadhouses refuse to sell it, saying it's too expensive and that it doesn't work in some engines. This is true particularly for motorbikes and lawn mowers, which can't be run on Opal. As a result, the preferred unleaded petrol is still obtainable and is reportedly brought into communities and sold for high prices (the article stated $100/litre). It's claimed some Indigenous people are also switching to sniffing glue instead, or turning to other drugs such as alcohol.
When I heard the discussion on whether Opal should be made mandatory to sell, rather than voluntary, my first thought was of course it should be. But it brought up other questions to me, like, as someone who firmly believes that people should have the freedom to decide what they do to their bodies, how is it my place (or anyone else's) to decide what substances are 'acceptable' (in my eyes) for someone to use? Do we draw the line depending on how dangerous the substance is? Some might claim that the consequences of petrol sniffing are too high, and that it can't be used responsibly, though I'm sure many people believe that about all drugs. Could we say that these communities can't make an informed choice to use because they lack education on petrol sniffing and it's effects? Once again, I feel uncomfortable on anyone else thinking that they are in a position to make that decision for someone else, or a whole community. It feels arrogant and superior to me.
Do you think it should be madatory for roadhouses to sell Opal? Everywhere? Just near Indigenous communities? In South Aus the Mount Dare Hotel Owners David and Melissa Cox still sell unleaded petrol, but not to Indigenous People
Do you think that anyone has the right to judge what substance someone else uses? Does this view change depending on the substance and its particular effects?
How do you think the harms resulting from petrol sniffing should be addressed? I read about some excellent work Peggy Nampijinpa Brown has been doing in Yuendumu, near Alice Springs. She takes them to Mt Theo Outstation, a geographically isolated, as well as powerfully spiritual spot for this Indigenous community. They're taken bush, and taught hunting, leadership and bush skills. She received an Order of Australia Medal for her work, and well deserved too IMO.
Note that I don't think that petrol sniffing is confined to Indigenous people, but I wanted to focus on this particular demographic for this thread, because I think it brings up interesting questions regarding the different standards we (often unconsciously) hold 'them' to, as opposed to 'us'.
Creative Spirits page on petrol sniffing.
Petrol sniffing: stepping softly is no solution. MARK SCHLIEBS, The Australian, July 28, 2012
Youth workers push for mandatory Opal fuel rollout. ABC News, 'The World Today radio program', reported by Sara Everingham.
As a measure to try and deal with the problem, the reportedly unsinffable petrol 'Opal' was introduced in 2005. This low-aromatic fuel is subsidised by the government so that it's the same price as normal unleaded fuel, but the switch to sell it is voluntary.
Opal is claimed to have slashed snffing rates, but its not a perfect solution. Opal fuel can still be sniffed, especially with some modifications, and in April 2007 a boy died after sniffing it. Also, some roadhouses refuse to sell it, saying it's too expensive and that it doesn't work in some engines. This is true particularly for motorbikes and lawn mowers, which can't be run on Opal. As a result, the preferred unleaded petrol is still obtainable and is reportedly brought into communities and sold for high prices (the article stated $100/litre). It's claimed some Indigenous people are also switching to sniffing glue instead, or turning to other drugs such as alcohol.
When I heard the discussion on whether Opal should be made mandatory to sell, rather than voluntary, my first thought was of course it should be. But it brought up other questions to me, like, as someone who firmly believes that people should have the freedom to decide what they do to their bodies, how is it my place (or anyone else's) to decide what substances are 'acceptable' (in my eyes) for someone to use? Do we draw the line depending on how dangerous the substance is? Some might claim that the consequences of petrol sniffing are too high, and that it can't be used responsibly, though I'm sure many people believe that about all drugs. Could we say that these communities can't make an informed choice to use because they lack education on petrol sniffing and it's effects? Once again, I feel uncomfortable on anyone else thinking that they are in a position to make that decision for someone else, or a whole community. It feels arrogant and superior to me.
Do you think it should be madatory for roadhouses to sell Opal? Everywhere? Just near Indigenous communities? In South Aus the Mount Dare Hotel Owners David and Melissa Cox still sell unleaded petrol, but not to Indigenous People
Do you think that anyone has the right to judge what substance someone else uses? Does this view change depending on the substance and its particular effects?
How do you think the harms resulting from petrol sniffing should be addressed? I read about some excellent work Peggy Nampijinpa Brown has been doing in Yuendumu, near Alice Springs. She takes them to Mt Theo Outstation, a geographically isolated, as well as powerfully spiritual spot for this Indigenous community. They're taken bush, and taught hunting, leadership and bush skills. She received an Order of Australia Medal for her work, and well deserved too IMO.
Note that I don't think that petrol sniffing is confined to Indigenous people, but I wanted to focus on this particular demographic for this thread, because I think it brings up interesting questions regarding the different standards we (often unconsciously) hold 'them' to, as opposed to 'us'.
Creative Spirits page on petrol sniffing.
Petrol sniffing: stepping softly is no solution. MARK SCHLIEBS, The Australian, July 28, 2012
Youth workers push for mandatory Opal fuel rollout. ABC News, 'The World Today radio program', reported by Sara Everingham.