^ While I see your point on the spelling and grammar thing, I still get annoyed by an obvious lackadaisical approach to spelling and grammar.
i have a lot of sympathy with the much-maligned grammar nazis online. i think what annoys them (and me) so much is not that people make these simple, easily-avoided mistakes but that they don't care that their contribution is substandard. why are people so content with - even oddly proud sometimes of - less than their best?
i recently discussed this with somebody here on bl. he had typed the plural "
soviets" as "
soviet's". i pointed it out and he got upset that somebody would point out a 'typo'. i argued that he was being intellectually dishonest. that's not a typo - there's no apostrophe anywhere near
soviets" the plural. "
soviest" would have been a typo...
another time, i pointed out a common misuse to somebody - probably a their/there/they're or a your/you're - and the guy told me that he knew how to use those words correctly he just
chose to use the incorrect version
deliberately!
the ultimate irony (and peeve

), for me, is that people - especially online - often use dismal spelling and grammar in posts pointing out how stupid other people are. i recently pointed out ironically poor grammar in a guy's post in which he was pointing out somebody else's poor writing. he wrote (of me) "
...just makes you look like a lame ass bastard who gets his kicks by flaunting his superior spelling powers.". lolhypocrisy!
my pet peeve for today - a $5.10 ticketmaster 'convenience' fee on an $18 show ticket.
alasdair