• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Personality Test

What is your Meyers-Briggs Type?


  • Total voters
    244
Now, does one-upping sound like a healer aspect to you? Because I am TOTALLY the better healer! Why? Because I just gave away TREE for FREE! Percieve THAT, Bingeboy! I make Princess Diana look like the former heir to a figurehead position in a crumbled empire, beeyotch!
 
ENFJ. Always ENFJ. I don't think it describes me that well though.
 
My type is:
INTP

Introverted Intuitive Thinking Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
78 75 1 89


Qualitative analysis of your type formula

You are:

* very expressed introvert
* distinctively expressed intuitive personality
* slightly expressed thinking personality
* very expressed perceiving personality


I have taken several different personality tests and always get INTP or INFP.
 
Last edited:
I've done this test three times and got the following results

INFJ * 1
INTJ * 2

From the descriptions I've read of both profiles I'm probably somewhere between them both alright. Interesting test.
 
I didn't do this particular test as I just did another elsewhere.

I got: ENFP - Champion

outgoing, social, disorganized, easily talked into doing silly things, spontaneous, wild and crazy, acts without thinking, good at getting people to have fun, pleasure seeking, irresponsible, physically affectionate, risk taker, thrill seeker, likely to have or want a tattoo, adventurous, unprepared, attention seeking, hyperactive, irrational, loves crowds, rule breaker, prone to losing things, seductive, easily distracted, open, revealing, comfortable in unfamiliar situations, attracted to strange things, non punctual, likes to stand out, likes to try new things, fun seeker, unconventional, energetic, impulsive, empathetic, dangerous, loving, attachment prone, prone to fantasy

Sounds like me :D
 
I got: ENFP-Champion

You are:
slightly expressed extrovert

distinctively expressed intuitive personality

moderately expressed feeling personality

distinctively expressed perceiving personality

I'm a champion, how odd. Methinks I shall go become a gladiator now, right after I ride my new mountainboard off mt. fuji
 
I will note that I think that thinking of each type as a collection of values along 4 dimensions is a bit misleading. What each type REALLY points to is a breakdown of your (supposed) preference for and competence using different ways of thinking. Each personality type points to a particular set of the top 4 cognitive functions for that type. The in-built bias is that items in the list of preferences are not orthogonal but rather correlate around the 16 personality types.

ebola
 
^ Summed up: There are 8 functions. Your 4 letters are simply (or should be best thought of as) an indication of how these functions are ordered in terms of preference.

I think that the type profiles are a bit like horoscopes... and are good mainly for getting people interested in knowing about themselves through the theory, though the functions provide a much more enlightening view of human nature (more specifically, the ways in which we differ.)
 
The usual MBTI model is that all your cognitive functions alternate between extrovert and introvert. If your primary function is introverted then your secondary is extroverted your tertiary is introverted etc. It doesn't seem to me that it would be that neat and tidy, to always alternate in that manner. I don't have data to contradict this model of how cognitive functions work, but it seems unlikely to me that cognitive functions would work that way universally.

I'm amazed at how many more people I meet in real life who are well versed on MBTI than ten years ago. One of the law schools around my area has everyone take a class on MBTI applied to practicing law. Lawyers are far more likely to be I,N, and T than the general population. Though I don't know if that's much different than other groups with advanced degrees.
 
>>The usual MBTI model is that all your cognitive functions alternate between extrovert and introvert. If your primary function is introverted then your secondary is extroverted your tertiary is introverted etc. It doesn't seem to me that it would be that neat and tidy, to always alternate in that manner. I don't have data to contradict this model of how cognitive functions work, but it seems unlikely to me that cognitive functions would work that way universally.>>

There is an additional assumption:
each type's functional preferences will include thinking, intuiting, feeling, and sensing, in some order. There are additional assumptions about the ordering of these functions, but I don't recall them off-hand. The following test sheds these assumptions:

http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/assessment/survey.html
edit: looks like they took down this test. Those fucks. :)

im INFJ: counselor

This is the rarest type, runners up being INTP and INTJ.
 
Last edited:
Enki said:
I'm amazed at how many more people I meet in real life who are well versed on MBTI than ten years ago. One of the law schools around my area has everyone take a class on MBTI applied to practicing law. Lawyers are far more likely to be I,N, and T than the general population. Though I don't know if that's much different than other groups with advanced degrees.

More likely than the general population... yea that's not much of a stretch to believe. ;)
 
This test had no options for "sometimes" or "depending on the situation" or "depending on WHOM your spending time with" for the "do you feel comfortable in groups" and the "you'd rather be in small groups" types of questions, so it gave me introvert. I am Honestly the center of attention at parties at which I know everyone there.

My score was "INTJ"

22% Introverted
38% Intuitive
25% Thinking
11% Judging

I'm a "slightly expressed introvert"

I moderately express an intuitive, thinking personality.

& I slightly express a judging personality.

It was pretty accurate I suppose, but I don't think it was thorough enough.
 
Like the other Idealists, Champions are rather rare, say two or three percent of the population, but even more than the others they consider intense emotional experiences as being vital to a full life. Champions have a wide range and variety of emotions, and a great passion for novelty. They see life as an exciting drama, pregnant with possibilities for both good and evil, and they want to experience all the meaningful events and fascinating people in the world. The most outgoing of the Idealists, Champions often can't wait to tell others of their extraordinary experiences. Champions can be tireless in talking with others, like fountains that bubble and splash, spilling over their own words to get it all out. And usually this is not simple storytelling; Champions often speak (or write) in the hope of revealing some truth about human experience, or of motivating others with their powerful convictions. Their strong drive to speak out on issues and events, along with their boundless enthusiasm and natural talent with language, makes them the most vivacious and inspiring of all the types.

Fiercely individualistic, Champions strive toward a kind of personal authenticity, and this intention always to be themselves is usually quite attractive to others. At the same time, Champions have outstanding intuitive powers and can tell what is going on inside of others, reading hidden emotions and giving special significance to words or actions. In fact, Champions are constantly scanning the social environment, and no intriguing character or silent motive is likely to escape their attention. Far more than the other Idealists, Champions are keen and probing observers of the people around them, and are capable of intense concentration on another individual. Their attention is rarely passive or casual. On the contrary, Champions tend to be extra sensitive and alert, always ready for emergencies, always on the lookout for what's possible.

Champions are good with people and usually have a wide range of personal relationships. They are warm and full of energy with their friends. They are likable and at ease with colleagues, and handle their employees or students with great skill. They are good in public and on the telephone, and are so spontaneous and dramatic that others love to be in their company. Champions are positive, exuberant people, and often their confidence in the goodness of life and of human nature makes good things happen.

Joan Baez, Phil Donahue, Paul Robeson, Bill Moyer, Elizibeth Cady Stanton, Joeseph Campbell, Edith Wharton, Sargent Shriver, Charles Dickens, and Upton Sinclair are examples of Idealist Champions

Close to being spot-fucking-on. I've bolded everything that really rings true. With this analysis, and the analysis I get from being Pisces born Goat (also is very accurate to my personality) apparently i'm one bloody rare type of person.
 
I'm INFP.

# moderately expressed introvert
# moderately expressed intuitive personality
# distinctively expressed feeling personality
# moderately expressed perceiving personality

Pretty close; in the listed "INFP jobs," my college major and planned future job, psychology/psychotherapist, is present. :)
 
Top