Sure, strictness is probably never wise - it suggest rigidity when you should always keep an open mind. I would, but I really need a little more than what I tend to pick up about subjects involving unseen forces and whether they are there or 'imagined'.
Chakra / body energies are a good example though: I don't dismiss it, especially considering the experiences I have had sober and tripping... but to me it is more a holistic approach to things that still don't have to take more than our nervous and secretory systems among others.
I'd like someone to make an argument about something beyond determinism though, which would make it supernatural I guess? Dialectics style, merit and plausibility always count most imo - and I think it can only be enriching to consider all possibilities.
Actually determinism can feel icky to me, I feel like I have to constantly make choices between disillusioning truths or sometimes wonderful, beliefs. Actually that is already pretty arrogant since it assumes that only determinism leads to truth. Reducing things is much worse even: often enough scientific explanations can be as mindblowing or even more - assuming everything has to be boring predictable mechanics seems like a mistake.
Emergent phenomena are an example of something not that easily reduced or determined even if you try... treating them like unreal or illusory seems wrong, holographic or something like that seems much better. Exceptional.
Chakra / body energies are a good example though: I don't dismiss it, especially considering the experiences I have had sober and tripping... but to me it is more a holistic approach to things that still don't have to take more than our nervous and secretory systems among others.
I'd like someone to make an argument about something beyond determinism though, which would make it supernatural I guess? Dialectics style, merit and plausibility always count most imo - and I think it can only be enriching to consider all possibilities.
Actually determinism can feel icky to me, I feel like I have to constantly make choices between disillusioning truths or sometimes wonderful, beliefs. Actually that is already pretty arrogant since it assumes that only determinism leads to truth. Reducing things is much worse even: often enough scientific explanations can be as mindblowing or even more - assuming everything has to be boring predictable mechanics seems like a mistake.
Emergent phenomena are an example of something not that easily reduced or determined even if you try... treating them like unreal or illusory seems wrong, holographic or something like that seems much better. Exceptional.
