trying to both sides a genocide is pretty pointless and lazy, on top of that its actively harmfulYou think Hamas is a normal reaction from Gaza due to Israeli policy, therefor you think it's justified for Hamas to decapitate babies? Oh my gosh!
See how pointless and lazy that is?
The genocide! THE GENOCIDE!!! Oh my LORD!the genocide
And even worse, it's inaccurate. We all know only one side of this conflict is truly aiming for the hallowed, all desirable genocide of their enemies. The most awesome of words, the loftiest of goals!trying to both sides a genocide is pretty pointless and lazy, on top of that its actively harmful
you're correct, Israel's leaders have been stating that openly for a while that their goal is the removal of Palestinians to take the landAnd even worse, it's inaccurate. We all know only one side of this conflict is truly aiming for the hallowed, all desirable genocide of their enemies. The most awesome of words, the loftiest of goals!
also the whole babies being decapitated thing was false so its nice that you keep bringing that up
if you actually read the reports one single baby was shot while being held by its motherSo much nicer to shoot them in their cribs. Hamas really ain't so bad after all!
if you actually read the reports one single baby was shot while being held by its mother
but I guess bombing children is your preferred method? that's what Israel has been doing for decades, haven't said anything about that so it must be okay?
I'm actively harming people?trying to both sides a genocide is pretty pointless and lazy, on top of that its actively harmful
leftists are defending Palestinians not Hamas. apparently that nuance is lost on youNo, as I have already said I do not support the current Israeli government. Comments by current and former officials especially since trumps reelection have made their intentions clear. To be specific, I've never trusted Netanyahu, but indeed i probably gave too much benefit of the doubt to the overall Israeli military apprautus.
Each day that passed it became less and less believable that their military objectives were ever realistic, thus their enthusiasm in continuing to pursue them (knowing the civilian cost) became more and more reprehensible. As for the legal definitions of genocide and ethnic cleansing, I'm not sure tbh, but to me it doesn't really matter. At this point, what are they even doing and how can they possibly justify it when they aren't any closer to retrieving the remaining hostages?
But I still think it's really gross how leftists defend Hamas. Whether they were propped up by Israel or not, no matter how much their people have been mistreated over the years, there is no justification for what they did. What someone said earlier is definitely true. Their ideology is actually the definition of genocide. If you condemn Israel without also condemning them I just automatically write you off as a wingnut who doesn't care about reason or morality. Just looking to adopt whatever opinion is most fashionable and gains you the most social currency, without ever being able to accept nuance or admit when you've been wrong.
I thought CE&P was gone but I was happy to stir some shit up when I saw it. Congrats on admin.This is my absolute last post in CE&P
leftists are defending Palestinians not Hamas. apparently that nuance is lost on you
could you please point out where I said "all"?Deny reality all you want.
![]()
History Illustrated: The story of Hamas and its fight for Palestine
From its inception, Hamas has chosen armed resistance in its efforts to liberate Palestine from Israeli occupation.www.aljazeera.com
I never said all leftists. But you know as well as I do there is a significant number who downplay or justify their atrocities. Not just Hamas, but other militant groups as well.
could you please point out where I said "all"?
that seems like an awful lot of assumptionsI never said all , either.
I'm legitimately glad you condemn Hamas, because I'm sure if you took a poll on our discord the majority of them wouldn't.
that seems like an awful lot of assumptions
everyone I know who supports Palestinians also condemn the violent actions of Hamas, considering that point its really weird how people can't stop making that claim and seems very suspiciously bad faith
how about we focus on the actual genocide that Israel is, and has been for decades, committing funded by our tax dollars?
are you suggesting that the people being oppressed by a genocidal apartheid state should be judged as if it has the same power and funding as the state which oppresses it?You just criticized snafu for both sidesing the genocide , but it appears as if you agree there are significant criticisms to make on both sides.
If I wasn't permanently banned (without ever being provided a reason, which is in violation of protocol) I'd make the poll myself.
Maybe/maybe not - honestly I don't know. As I understand, the food she was transporting did get into US/Israeli humanitarian channels. Hopefully that means that the ends ultimately resulted in aid reaching starving people. The additional effect is that Palestinians who are trapped in Gaza could see that *someone* is trying to help them outside of the obviously dangerous existing legitimate channels that WFP food is being distributed through - channels that have lead to civilian deaths while forcing an occupied populace to rely on their occupiers for fairness.It feels like you might have missed my point. If her goal was actually to help feed hungry Palestinians, a monetary donation to the WFP would have been a million times more efficient. Everyone, including her, knew she wasn't going to make it to the shores of Gaza. In case you haven't heard, there is a naval blockade of that entire coastline. She knew with 100% certainty that there would be Israeli intervention. I tend to think that might've been more of the objective.