CrimpJiggler
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 241
You can try smoking chamomile tea. Smoking it is more effective than drinking it. I recommend giving picamilon a try too.
I agree, I'm sure I never said as such?
I agree however I am in Australia (read: Western society), so yes I am only referring to these regions, additional there is a general consensus/opinion of what constitutes a "CAM therapy".
It's easy to - and in the same instance I'm in no way defending/justifying actions of pharmaceutical companies ("Big-Pharma" if you want to go down the "down with the big, insensitive, only about the financial gain-corporations"-type conspiracy bandwagon) however I don't believe this to be true! I'm sure you're aware of the patenting capabilities/persuasion abilities of pharmaceutical companies, I'm sure they would in deed find a way to patent a tx....if shown to truly be (decently) efficacious! I'm extremely doubtful that if a tx/dx capability/etc. was in fact shown to have beneficial activity, there would be no stopping it from becoming a legitimate therapy! Yes many pharma advances are and were financed/directed/employed/etc by pharmaceutical companies, on the individual/team level the good intentions are predominant - people with technical skill and applying it for advancements!
It's well known that drugs/tx/therapies (unfortunately) do in fact come in and out of vogue - often irrespective of efficacy however this is obviously a primary influence (new, better treatments become available/economically viable and such and hence start to be used). So I agree with you about extrinsic factors can be the motivating factors, instead of the more important pt's interests!
I never inferred that allopathic/mainstream "Western" medicines weren't harmful, of course they can be! I've always said and tried to make it known that all drugs can be poisons/harmful, no drug (mainstream or otherwise) is without risk! The main difference / point of the dangers of CAM therapies is that, due to the field (for the most part) not having any sort of regulation (other then "self" 8) ), nor any specific legislation in terms of quality/purity, nor requirements for any sort of proof of efficacy/(contra-)indications/benefit which all lead to negative outcomes for pt's either because they've attempted to diagnose/treat themselves (a case in China comes to mind where a women attempted to perform acupuncture onto herself, without training of course, leading to her piercing her heart with one of the needles!), the pt choosing to replace their (allopathic) treatment leading to anything from a longer recovery period to morbidity (there have unfortunately been a number of cases of pt's refusing typical neoplastic/cancer targeted therapies, using a CAM alternative and dying from their disease!) or in the worst case an alt-med "professional" knowingly deceiving an individual for financial gain (has/does happened)!
Even from a public health/epidemiological perspective - it is full well known that there is an increased burden on the health system (it could be said a burden effecting everyone, from the individual to family/friends, health care professionals even to the tax payer and regarding many aspects; financially, physically, emotionally, etc) the longer one is ill (ie, chronic conditions). Yes this is true irrespective of treatment, yet this period may be extended if someone is using a treatment which isn't (not scientifically, empirically proven) to be beneficial/efficacious!! No one can sit there and expect (I assume) intelligent people to believe in ridiculous "treatments" such as homoeopathy! -_-
I'm not "against" alt-med type treatments, many (what would today be called) "mainstream" treatments such as "old-wives tales"-like things began as such - aspirin (specifically salicylic acid) is a well known example! Taken (and used for centuries for even today's indication) from the bark of certain willow trees! The difference however is that those (now incorporated) have been tested and been shown to actually work! (often purified and/or synthetically made) There definitely exists treatments which do help - Saint Johns Wort is a nice example - with it's serotonergic activity for use in mild-moderate depression!
There are a few specific things which just irks me about not just the alternatives but the actual alternative med profession! There is absolutely no accountability of the provider's actions (good or bad)! and (I'm a man of science so) I believe if a product is marketed/purposed to provide something....it should! Many of these therapies have been extensively researched/trialed and it's overwhelmingly clear the evidence shows many of them in fact not to be efficacious! (with some show possible damage) The research CAM proponents often present are, in subsequent trials / examination of the trails, shown to be flawed! Introducing biases (intentionally or not), flawed procedures, contaminants, subjective responses (which isn't a form of scientific evidence) and the influence which bias results toward an outcome!
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/
http://whatstheharm.net/
www.quackwatch.com/
edgydoc.com/
http://skepdic.com/refuge/harmarchive.html