AutoTripper
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Messages
- 10,196
We have actually been quite increasingly vocally prominent though I would say, which takes a bit of ball too.Krinkles this Krinkles that blah blah blah
and now ive assembled an army of anti-vaxxers to hijack the thread too right?
ya know what? ive been attacked left and right in this thread for my stance of just wanting to hear BOTH sides of the argument, and then a little momentum swings towards the negative side of the current vaccines, and you're complaining now that we've "taken over" lol
let's face it - you don't wanna hear the other side of it....
the pro-vaxx side might be the worst side of it because of the power to suppress.....which if you ask me, is more dangerous....i think what they should be doing, is loudly debunking anything that's just not true - like stupid shit with the magnets and nanobot hyper-theory tweeker stories
there's a ton vaccine injuries occurring and to me, that's the most important part of this - i wanna hear about all of the injuries because that's something we all need to be aware of and that's being suppressed....and i dont think that's ok - so yea i am a little irritated with the mainstream for suppressing that type of info as you should be too...safety is of the utmost importance here
but whatever
nobody cares
except for me and a few million others
![]()
But of course I can hear you and feel you, and tension and divide has been so high.
However, I do feel on some levels and valid points, we are trying to be more realistic, honest and practical than we are credited for, as it’s like Peter cried Wolf in a sense, it’s just all seen as more of the same, past a point, simply by nature.
So the Baby goes out with the tub, when there is a baby.
We talk about sources too. Now, for many, their source is the government directly.
The mainstream news channels. BBC etc. They are arguably the biggest single news network in terms of reach, notoriety and probably until a few years ago even overall credibility, planet wide?
I’m just musing at that out of interest. I can’t think of another bigger rival.
The BBC staunchly reject the questioning of 9/11. That’s the only point I’ll make.
If what we say, the BBC were saying, heads WOULD turn.
That’s a fact (shit I used that word again lol, now I gotta find some…lol)
I’m not defending and disputing that I have unwittingly, by not trusting mainstream and being too open to the point of gullibility, referenced inaccurate information and plain propaganda.
But the government statistics, testing programme, main news channels, etc etc, that is where I see the most propaganda and serious need for questioning.