Jabberwocky
Frumious Bandersnatch
true. so, i don't agree with limiting the lives of people who are genuinely unable to be vaccinated. if you are vulnerable but able to be vaccinated, and haven't been, that's on you.The whole argument to begin with was we need to protect vulnerable people.
every single time a contagious person goes into a poorly ventilated location, they pose a risk to every other person in that location, vaccinated or not, though obviously the vaccinated are at far lower risk than the unvaccinated. the majority of people testing positive now, and thus the majority of contagious people, are unvaccinated (see, e.g. https://apnews.com/article/coronavi...mAHlizWmyvsmfisjLHZPJpy7iQ2he9vhFwY4TMhQTtxMg). what i disagree with is those people's rights to put everyone else they come into contact with at risk. if you make a decision that puts other people in danger i think its perfectly acceptable for society as a collective to reduce the danger you pose.
if other businesses allow unvaccinated/unmasked individuals they potentially serve as hubs for contagion. their decision doesn't impact only them, it impacts potentially everyone worldwide. if a superspreader (usually most people infected infect no one, but some people infect 10s of people) enters that location, and infects 50% of the people there, a minority of those people wlll go onto be superspreaders elsewhere, presumably in other businesses that don't give a shit. if these businesses are allowed to operate in this way they are the ones putting the lives of everyone in that locale in danger- honestly i don't fancy ending up in a car crash or having a heart attack somewhere where vaccination rates are low these businesses operate cos they are helping keep transmission rates high and nobody needs exhausted doctors and over stretched medical facilities in a medical emergency.It should be up to restaurant owners to decide the standards of entry, shouldn't it? There are businesses and customers that don't think like you. Why can't they just live their lives?
every single time a virus replicates, there is the (albeit extremely low for sars-cov2) probability of mutation into something that evades vaccines better, is more transissibile, etc. so we need to prevent every replication possble, which means taking all reaosnable means to prevent transmission to new hosts.
its not an individual choice when it endangers people around you. we might as well argue about drunk driving as far as i'm concerned.
relevant, possibly the only good thing an investment bank has ever done: https://thehill.com/business-a-lobb...IdFz9JnspcqJi8AncaVA6-28NMdOyeIXiQdRV8YvNZB5s