• H&R Moderators: streaM Freak

On nutritionists & food fads - the battleground between marketing & and common sense

bit_pattern

Ex-Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
8,127
On nutritionists & food fads - the battleground between marketing & and common sense

Thought I'd share this article I saw with the forum as I often see a lot of expensive bunkum being promoted around here - it's always pays to remain sceptical about some of the fantastical claims made about the latest fad foods and the qualifications and expertise of those people promoting them:

https://theconversation.com/superfoods-another-battleground-between-marketing-and-common-sense-21945

‘Superfoods’ - another battleground between marketing and common sense

Over the previous weekend the morning magazine shows I have on during lazy mornings had 2 glamorous nutritionist types breathlessly discussing the latest ‘superfoods’ that would be big in 2014.

It’s difficult to think of a job description which triggers queasiness in me faster than ‘nutritionist’. The title is not a protected term, meaning it can be used without any specific qualifications. Sadly, many who use the job title are poorly trained and seem to feel no particular responsibility to make statements that correspond even roughly with reality. For every Dr Rosemary Stanton there are dozens of less scientifically literate and community minded colleagues.

The misleading and fatuous nature of the information provided by some nutritionists in the mass media has been highlighted in scientific circles for a long time, most famously and effectively by Dr Ben Goldacre in the UK. He went as far as obtaining certification from the American Association of Nutritional Consultants (AANC) for his dead cat Henrietta, giving ‘poor Hettie’ posthumous professional recognition as a colleague of many UK media nutritionists.

The most serious profession which follows the science of food and nutrition is dietetics. Dietitians are part of science-based healthcare and have a comprehensive professional structure which ensures their opinions are likely to be reputable. The title Accredited Practising Dietition (APD) is a legally protected one, and a fair guarantee of scientifically reasonable advice.This is most likely why dietitians are the only nutrition professionals recognised by Medicare and other funding bodies. It’s probably also why you don’t see many of them making sales pitches on commercial TV for their latest eating plan or superfood.

In any case, both of the youthful and bubbly nutritionists were asked to present their opinions for the viewers regarding ‘superfoods’. Rather than looking sheepish and admitting that there is really very little to the idea of superfoods, they launched into a stream of inane pseudoscientific factoids in rapturous praise of exotica like quinoa, goji berries and green tea. My eye-rolling became audible when one of the talking heads blithely answered a direct question about the lack of scientific credibility for superfoods invoking ‘ancient wisdom’ and the whole paleofantasy meme.

Miracle foods and dietary crazes have been around for hundreds of years, but our susceptibility as a species to their blowsy charms seems undiminished. We always want a short cut when deep down we know there is hard work to be done. We always want to feel like we know more than the next guy or to be in on a secret.

Quinoa is a good example. It is almost unique among grain and seed crops for having the full complement of essential amino acids. It makes a lot of sense to use it as a staple cereal in subsistence farming. In fact the Peruvian government has a quinoa program as a public health measure to avoid malnourishment in poor communities. It also makes sense for astronauts to eat it, as it is light to carry and full of nutrients. The average consumer in a developed country has no particular need to eat quinoa as it is virtually impossible to become protein-deficient with even an unhealthy diet. It’s good for those who are gluten-intolerant to have a palatable choice to add to their diet, but it certainly doesn’t make ethical sense for healthy consumers in affluent countries to poach the staple crops from those who actually need them in dewy-eyed pursuit of a utopian state of health.

The food fads of the developed world are not without consequences for the environment, either. Quinoa is sourced mainly from Peru, where soaring export prices have created difficulty for locals who now are having problems affording their staple food, and are using their newfound income to become more like their Coke and fries-loving North American neighbours. Huge swathes of farmland in China are being turned over to production of Goji berries though they are not of any particular medical value. Hype over the as-yet-unsupported claims of ginseng to improve memory and ‘energy levels’ has landed both Asian and American ginseng on the WWF priority list of endangered species. Producers of chia, an unexciting Latin American crop that happens to have high levels of antioxidants have struggled to cope with the rapid increase in demand for their crop, and are planning to expand production at the expense of other crops.

When chia seeds, goji berries and quinoa are no longer the superfoods du jour, these companies will presumably wind down and the farmers will be left to contemplate the wisdom of basing their long term economic hopes on the vagaries of dietary crazes in rich, distant countries. The hucksters who promote superfoods will have made their money and moved on to some other weight loss or health-promoting scheme.

To be fair, conservationists may be able to take advantage of uninformed wingnuttery to help save some of the Amazon rainforest, so it may not be all bad. Stable, sustainable production of quinoa may help with food security in the developing world but this is a long way from happening, and is not thanks to promotion in the developed world by health food enthusiasts.

I’m not suggesting that variety and healthy choices are not important. I’m also not suggesting that we as a community should continue with the eating patterns that have us contending for the title of World’s Most Obese Country.. I am suggesting that valuable media airtime should be spent educating people how to prepare and plan a varied, balanced diet. Claims for biological effects of individual foods should be based on credible sources not promoted beyond the evidence. Conflicts of interest should be disclosed if the food is being promoted in the media. The core messages about healthy eating should not be lost in the dense fog of hemi-facts emitted by the engines of the health food industry.

I’m all for selling cookbooks to make it easy and fun to prepare healthy meals, but can we drop the pretence that there are short cuts to be taken with miracle foods?

There's a lot of links embedded in the article for anyone who wants to research any of the claims made by the author :)
 
I’m all for selling cookbooks to make it easy and fun to prepare healthy meals, but can we drop the pretence that there are short cuts to be taken with miracle foods? one else.

I like this statement here due to the fact that there are diets out there where people have to cut out almost every thing in their diet or go into some type of pill for cleansing and cut out some of the important nutrients that our bodies need in order for it to stay healthy. I have always believed in moderation and exercise and if I want to cut out something out of my diet then it has to be slowly. i have tried the juicing diet but it made me feel dizzy and uncomfortable so I had to slowly cut out junk food and processed meat and I feel healthier than ever.
 
Quinoa is sourced mainly from Peru, where soaring export prices have created difficulty for locals who now are having problems affording their staple food, and are using their newfound income to become more like their Coke and fries-loving North American neighbours. Huge swathes of farmland in China are being turned over to production of Goji berries though they are not of any particular medical value. Hype over the as-yet-unsupported claims of ginseng to improve memory and ‘energy levels’ has landed both Asian and American ginseng on the WWF priority list of endangered species. Producers of chia, an unexciting Latin American crop that happens to have high levels of antioxidants have struggled to cope with the rapid increase in demand for their crop, and are planning to expand production at the expense of other crops.

There are problems with quinoa production in Peru -- but there are more problems with asparagus! Railing against economic development is a pastime of many a proto-Marxist, but it never makes sense.

If nations can't be built by destroying the environment to sell a useless plant, then explain how tobacco built the USA? There are losers in the superfood wars, but the producers are laughing all the way to the bank. To put it bluntly, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization declared 2013 the International Year of Quinoa, and who am I going to believe, the combined intellectual expertise of 192 nations or some hippie who's scared of capitalism?

Similar arguments apply to goji berries -- these aren't healthy but who cares they're delicious -- and chia, which is actually popular because people don't like the taste of flaxseed. These may be nothing special, but they're not costing anything for the sellers.

[Quinoa] is almost unique among grain and seed crops for having the full complement of essential amino acids.

Quinoa protein has a PDCAAS of 87. For comparison, wheat clocks in at 42, hempseed 59, barley ~70, cashews 92, amaranth 89, green peas 95, pumpkin seeds 100, and soybeans 100. It's a solid score, but nothing out of the ordinary.
 
Last edited:
The problem is that the science is not totally trustworthy on any side because there are billion dollar industries competing for supremacy, and it has even infected education systems with faulty information.

There are some obvious quack products out there that common sense would tell a person to avoid, but others are more subtle. For instance, there are many herbal combos marketed for all sorts of issues, but they ignore traditional knowledge. For instance, products with ginseng should not be taken indefinitely, but many companies market it that way.

In the end most research is not going to be able to tell you how the product will work for you, since we all have different metabolisms (genetically speaking). Aside from that, it's useful to seek out real knowledge holders who have traditional understandings of how the different health substances are used.
 
Top