• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Official Paedo Discussion Megathread v2

He's not what I'd call my type physically .. he's way too contrived for the reasons you mention, but he's what I'd class as 'generically good looking'
 
I remember when the Max Mosley 'Nazi' orgy scandal came out, how Fern Britain said it was basically in the public eye primarily because we find it a little bit erotic, and lap it up in the tabloids...I was thinking maybe the same is applying here to some degree.

Not that Fern Britain is an oracle on public opinion, but I am young and naive.
 
I don't think they're comparable situations. A nazi themed orgy vs babyfucking

balance well and truly tipped
 
Albion said:
I remember when the Max Mosley 'Nazi' orgy scandal came out, how Fern Britain said it was basically in the public eye primarily because we find it a little bit erotic, and lap it up in the tabloids...I was thinking maybe the same is applying here to some degree.

Not that Fern Britain is an oracle on public opinion, but I am young and naive.
Click to expand...

Period costume S&M and baby rape are not the same
 
Aye yeah I suppose.

I don't find it erotic :sus: But the guy is attractive; and the resulting conflict in my head is a curious one.
 
Albion said:
Aye yeah I suppose.

I don't find it erotic :sus: But the guy is attractive; and the resulting conflict in my head is a curious one.
Click to expand...
I would say he is good looking but definitely not attractive. He's positively repulsive after you find out what he's done.
 
Celebrity sex offenders who abuse fame face more jail time
_h353_w628_m6_otrue_lfalse.jpg

CELEBRITY sex offenders who exploit their fame to commit and hide their crimes could face longer jail terms under revised sentencing guidelines which will come into play next year.

The overhaul of the guidelines - which now place more emphasis on psychological harm - represents a major step in the criminal justice system. The new guidelines will reflect a "more sophisticated understanding of the psychology of sex offenders and the harm done to their victims," the BBC says.

Under the new guidelines, due out in England and Wales next year, offenders who "abuse their position of power" could face longer jail terms. Other factors which will be taken into consideration by judges might be grooming activity and whether the offence is filmed, the BBC says.

Work began on the new guidelines a number of years ago, Sky News says. But the changes follow a series of high-profile sex offence cases - notably the Jimmy Savile and Stuart Hall cases and cases of grooming in Rochdale and Oxford - "which have had an impact on attitudes towards sex crimes".

The guidelines cover more than 50 offences including rape, child sex offences and trafficking. They also bring in higher starting points for sentences for some offences, such as rape, which will extend to 15 years.

The previous guidelines, released in 2004, concentrated on the "physicality of the offence itself", says the BBC’s legal correspondent Clive Coleman. "The seriousness of the crime was principally determined by which part of the offender's body touched which part of the victim's body."

In its revised form, the guidance will put more emphasis on the long-term and psychological impact on victims.

Says Coleman: "Now a judge will have to look in detail at what happened before the crime, such as the [offender’s] motivation and how they used their power or position to groom. And the judge will also have to look in detail at what happened after the crime. In particular, consideration will be given to the long-term psychological harm done to the victim."
 
How about parents and other family members, who are the abusers of their 'position of power' in the majority of child sex abuse cases?

I suppose that doesn't make for a good headline...
 
Paul Gambaccini rebailed by Operation Yewtree officers

_70853778_70853773.jpg


BBC broadcaster Paul Gambaccini and another man have been rebailed by police investigating claims of historic sexual offences.

Mr Gambaccini, 64, and an unnamed 74-year-old were arrested at separate south London addresses in October as part of Operation Yewtree.

He denies all the allegations made against him.

The pair were the 15th and 17th people detained under the investigation set up following the Jimmy Savile scandal.

Police say they fall under the strand of the Yewtree termed "others" - those allegations not connected to Savile.

The other two strands concern the actions of Savile himself, and those involving "Savile and others".

Mr Gambaccini and the 74-year-old were initially bailed until January 2014 but have now had their bail extended until March.

Operation Yewtree has been investigating historical sexual offences since claims of abuse were made against former BBC radio DJ and television presenter Savile, following his death at the age of 84 in 2011.

At the time of his arrest, a spokesman for Mr Gambaccini said he was co-operating with the investigation.
 
I mean regarding what happens between two consenting adults in terms of perviness re: no moral fibre. That's not to say I indulge in perviness of an epic nature either (I'm way too lazy nowadays), just that people shouldnt be judged for doing so, and as consenting adults, it's nobodies business but their own

Not what happens between two consenting adults who decide to rape children who cannot consent.
 
Last edited:
ah i see thanks for the clarification. Its refreshing to read such honest and open things, and for all EADDs faults its a good thing that you feel safe to express such things here. That really does say something positive about the community here IMO. I guess its a pretty "liberal" community here, so no ones gonna be prudish or judgemental about what consenting adults choose to do, particularly given your final qualifying statement, which no one in their right mind would disagree with.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top