Shitty attitude? I provided more hard facts with regard to the opening question than anyone else did
![:\](https://bluelight.org/xf/BL_Images/Orig_Emoji/wrygrin.gif "wry grin :\")
You can estimate the active dosage from these numbers with ease, well, provided that you get genuine material, which seems to be a rare exception these days. Not speaking of pure material, LOL!
I'm sorry to have sounded educative, but 9 out of 10 questions in ADD like yours are nothing else than begging to get spoon-fed with information about the latest available RC-crap. I can assure you that there is nothing more known about this material -
at least not in the scientifically accessible literature, than I have told you.
Boiling and melting points were just calculated (read:
completely useless), the molecular mass can be calculated by a child using the PSE, chemical formula and IUPAC-name can be derived from (free) programs or with 5 min using your brain and a basic Org Chem textbook. Summarizing, you haven't provided
any viable information! NOTHING! The OP, therefore, translates for me into:
"Look what I have found! I don't know anything about, but please educate me, I wanna get high."
Where, please tell me (without getting offensive)
where is the "genuinely interest in educating yourself on the more advanced aspects of drugs and how they work" in your question? I can't see it.
Why bothering with potentially harmful stuff, which will be delivered fake, or cut, or impure, or all 3 of these together. That's how the oh-so-beloved RC-market seems to work at the moment. And threads like this are nothing else than indirect advertising, further pushing this inhuman market.
That's why I wrote what I wrote before. I will remain humble and silent as soon as somebody can come up with some real data on this, resp. for similar threads in the future. Citing the rules of Bluelight's ADD:
This forum was created to discuss things which don't fit in any other. Examples of things we want to see are:
* Share something you have found in a peer-reviewed journal and present it for open discussion. A full abstract should be provided at a bare minimum. This is similar to the Drugs in the Media format.
* Review/summarize a series of at least two related peer-reviewed articles and present summaries in a "for your information" format.
* Present a "problem" that you are trying to answer. Include what you have come up with so far and ask for assistance completing the solution.
* Present accepted facts and explore what (if anything) can be extrapolated beyond what is known.
* Present two supported theories that seem to be in conflict with each other and debate the relative merits of each.
* Present any topic that you feel fit in with this forum.
While NONE of the first five points seems to get much attention recently (all of them request to
give some info, too), the last one is stretched to the outmost interpretable one can imagine
Edit: With regard to the "EDIT" in the last post, I admit that I've indeed chosen some harsh words. My sincere apologies about that. Fact is though, that you just suggested a
random chemical, most probably only inspired by the latest advertisment of a RC-vendor, which himself only ordered it from China because it was jst offered and resembles tramadol somehow. These idiots don't even know themselves what they are selling, nor do they know how pure it is,
but nonetheless they keep it selling to the crowd. Stop playing the guinea pig for those fucktards, boy, where is your self-esteem?
