NJ Allows Medical Marijuana for a Fraction of the People Who Need It

phr

Bluelighter
Joined
May 25, 2004
Messages
36,649
Location
St. Charles, IL
NJ Allows Medical Marijuana for a Fraction of the People Who Need It
Stephen Webster
AlterNet
1.12.10



By a vote of 48 to 14 in the state's assembly on Monday, New Jersey became the 14th state in the union to make legal accommodations for the use of medical marijuana.

However, California this is not.

The bill, which was supported by both outgoing Gov. John Corzine and Governor-elect Chris Christie, will likely become law this week. It restricts doctors from prescribing marijuana for anything less than a terminal illness or debilitating condition, such as cancer, AIDS or multiple sclerosis.

Patients will not be allowed to grow their own supply and sales of medical marijuana will be tracked by the same regulatory framework used with powerful opiates like OxyContin.

New Jersey Assemblyman Reed Gusciora, a Democrat, told The New York Times that the state's medical marijuana provision will be the most strict in the entire nation and would likely become "a model" for other states.

Instead of allowing private pot shops that limit their customers to those with a prescription, New Jersey will establish six non-profit marijuana growing operations that do not purchase their supply from elsewhere.

"It would legitimize marijuana as a medicine in a way other states haven't," Chris Goldstein, of the Coalition for Medical Marijuana, told NBC New York.

"This is a wonderful beginning," said Nancy Fedder, a 62-year-old multiple sclerosis sufferer and illegal medical marijuana patient, speaking to Bloomberg. "It’s something that needed to happen a long time ago; sometimes I have to go to bed and stay there for days, and when I smoke marijuana the pain comes right down."

The Times noted that opponents of the New Jersey bill repeatedly cited California's allowance of medical marijuana as a cautionary tale.

However, in California, the annual value of the state's illegal marijuana crop has been estimated to top $13.8 billion, according to The San Francisco Chronicle. In the time since California legalized medical marijuana with loose restrictions on where and how it could be sold, the drug has effectively been decriminalized state-wide.

Should the state legalize the plant for recreational use, legislators expect to see up to $4 billion in tax revenue in the first year alone, at a time when California is coping with deep budget cuts amid a fiscal crisis unlike any the state has ever seen.

While voter initiatives have ensured that legalization will be on the 2010 ballot, Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) may be two steps ahead of them. A long time proponent of legalization, Ammiano chairs the assembly's Public Safety Committee, where he plans to hold the first hearing on marijuana legalization in the history of the United States.

His bill, the Marijuana Legalization, Regulation, and Education Act, would tax and regulate marijuana similarly to alcohol. The committee has scheduled a hearing and vote on Tuesday, after which Ammiano plans to hold a press conference, according to San Diego News Room.

Link!
 
states are starting to pass laws for medical use.... I just hate when some states(New Jersey+ some more) want to have medical bud..... BUT to have it here in Nj... you must have a terminally ill disease...So they call my weed medicine.... But only medicine for people with a terminally ill disease and no one else.... what a load of bullshit

Only patients with specific illnesses would be permitted to get a prescription: cancer, glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS, seizure disorder, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (also known as Lou Gherig’s disease), severe muscle spasms, muscular dystrophy, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease and any terminal illness if a doctor has determined the patient will die within a year...


They pass a law to make something legal , but only if your on your death bed....
 
A step in the right direction none the less. The foot is in the door, at least there is no going back from this point, things can only continue to improve over time.
 
They made the laws so strict in New Jersey regarding medicinal marijuana, they might as well kept it illegal. It's going to be next to impossibly to get prescribed the marijuana, and I'm sure they'll only have ONE state regulated store in the entire state. At this point i think the max you can have is 48grams a month. They also said it would take a few YEARS for things to get started.

My hopes are:

1. Things will get moving faster to get terminally ill patients what want/need,

2. As the poster said above me, now that our foot is in the door, improvemtns will be made on this, and other laws regarding marijuana.

3. Less restriction on maximum amount.

4. Currently, it is illegal even with a license to grow marijuana. Hopefully this will expand as more diseases are accepted with marijuana treatment.

I have epilepsy which is resistant to literally 95% of the medications I take. The ones I do respond to cause horrible side effects, including Lupus and a broad range of birth defects. It's also neuro toxic. Marijuana kept me seizure free for over a year when it was ingested at low levels daily. Unfortunately it is still illegal for me to ingest or smoke.
 
Why all the government concern over people growing some plants to consume? The world has gone completely mad in the past 100 years. Mad tyrants on the loose.
 
^^yeah, baby steps. At least the common perception in the US has changed that if someone really needs it it's considered medicine. I'm not saying other people don't really need cannabis, I'm just saying society seems to be cool with giving these people cannabis. So it is medicine. That's a big step in the right direction.

So long as the sky doesn't start falling, social acceptability will continue increase. Especially once people see their own friends and family benefiting from medical cannabis. It's not a bad step. 10 years ago this would have been laughed off. It's just a matter of time.
 
People have a natural inalienable right to decide what to feed their own bodies. Does a person own himself? Or does the government have ownership of the People like slaves or cattle? That's tyranny.
 
Top