• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

NEWS: The Age - 30/12/10 "Court confusion over 'legal' party drug"

hoptis

Bluelight Crew
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
11,081
Location
Melbourne

Court confusion over 'legal' party drug
Steve Butcher
December 30, 2010 - 7:30AM

THE legal status of a new ecstasy-like party drug linked to deaths overseas is causing confusion in the Victorian justice system.

Mephedrone, also known as "meow meow", first appeared in Europe in 2007 and has since been linked to up to 25 deaths in Britain.

Meow meow, which has acute psychological and physical effects, was banned this month by the European Union.

It is an offence punishable by jail under Australian federal laws to import or possess it, but Victoria remains the only jurisdiction that does not specifically list it as a controlled drug.

Victoria Police last night confirmed the drug was not listed in the Victorian Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act, and it would prosecute its importation under federal law.

A federal government-funded study published this month found that the drug's increased use was driven by its "legal status".

"In the recent past, mephedrone, also known as 4-methylmethcathinone or 4-MMC (and other synthetic cathinones) have not been controlled substances in many countries and have been freely available for purchase as 'research chemicals' or 'plant food' either online or in shops which sell 'legal highs'," the authors reported for the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre.

While its status is under review, a Commonwealth prosecutor recently told a Victorian County Court judge there was ambiguity and uncertainty over the drug under Victorian law.

Judge Jane Patrick remarked in discussion with prosecutor Megan Lawler-Cooper over sentencing for a man who imported the drug that the "tricky thing about this is whether it's an illegal drug or not".

Judge Patrick said: "It's a bit uncertain if it's an illegal drug in Victoria."

Three days later, when another man pleaded guilty to importing 4-MMC, his barrister, Colin Mandy, told a magistrate it was "debatable whether this drug is caught by this [Victorian] act".

The drug is a border-controlled drug under the Commonwealth Criminal Code, where it is listed as an analogue of methcathinone. Under schedule 11 of the Victorian act, methylamino-propiophenone is listed with "methcathinone" alongside in brackets. What has not been tested or resolved in Victoria is whether 4-MMC is "salts, derivatives or isomers" of drugs specified in schedule 11.

A forensic physician recently told a Melbourne court its effects included euphoria, excitement, empathy and talkativeness, and excessive use could lead to aggression, agitation, excitability and mania, while deaths have been reported. Cathinone comes from the khat plant.

Malich Coory, 20, of Greenvale, pleaded guilty before Judge Patrick to importing 753 grams and possessing 1.5 kilograms of 4-MMC, while Dale Ullrich, 32, of Avondale Heights, pleaded guilty to importing 330 grams.

Customs officers in 2009 intercepted packages to the men from overseas. Coory's father, Phillip, told defence barrister Tony Burns his son indicated the packages were health supplements and he did not believe he would be prosecuted.

Ullrich told federal police he thought it was a grey area. He said: "In other words, [customs] were going to destroy it for you for free and that's it [no legal ramifications]."

Sanjeev Gaya, a forensic physician at the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, said in a statement tendered at Ullrich's committal hearing that 4-MMC was taken orally, snorted or injected and was "abused" as an alternative to amphetamine-related drugs.

Coory will be sentenced next year while Ullrich was ordered to appear later in the County Court.


The Age
 
...cases like these are falling through the legal net more than often. A handful of cases this year have shown that prosecution put it in the too hard basket and didn't proceed in testing out the unchartered analogue laws!
 
Sounds clear cut to me. If you import it into Victoria, you are committing a crime under federal law. However, if you buy it from someone else in Victoria and are caught with it... you can't be charged until they either legislate for it, or they will try and nail you under the analogue laws (I don't know much about Victorian analogue laws).

Am I missing something here?
 
^ That sounds correct to me.

Although if the Victorian scheduling of drugs is dependant upon the scheduling in the SUSDP (or whatever it is called now), then the recent inclusion of 4-MMC in schedule 9 should mean that it is now prohibited.

The situation in WA was the same until 4-MMC was added to schedule 9 of the SUSDP. Under WA law, once that occurred, 4-MMC automatically became a prohibited drug for the purposes of the WA Misuse of Drugs Act and illegal to possess etc.

Prior to this there was some debate whether the "analogue clause" in the SUSDP would have caught it by virtue of the scheduling of methcathinone, but I don't think anyone took the point and now it is a moot one. However, people were prosecuted in WA for possession of 4-MMC before it was added to schedule 9.
 
A federal government-funded study published this month found that the drug's increased use was driven by its "legal status".

Read: availability. If good quality MDMA was still around in spades who would bother with this nasty crap?

More collateral damage from the w.o.d.
 
Umm Biscuit, according to something i read recently, 4mmc is S4 in the SUSDP. not S9 at all.

But, I'm not 100% sure of that, have to look at the current SUSDP myself, have you had a look?
 
^ It's now the SUSMP. It is Schedule IX, you are thinking of the notice phase_dancer posted which referred to Customs scheduling which is different to the SUSMP schedules. S4 for Customs refers to the licences and restrictions on importation.
 
Mr Blonde is correct.

Check out this link for information on the SUSDP (now SUSMP, thanks Mr Blonde). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_for_the_Uniform_Scheduling_of_Drugs_and_Poisons

Generally, any substance in schedule 8 or 9 is a prohibited drug and possession of these substances without authority is an offence.

Unfortunately, any new and interesting substance which is psychoactive and has the potential to be abused (in the eyes of the government body responsible for the scheduling) gets thrown into schedule 9 very quickly, before anyone has really had the chance to investigate the effects, both short and long term, of the substance. Once that occurs, it becomes almost impossible for laboratories to properly study the compounds without authority from a very high level, in addition to the mountains of red tape and associated headaches that go with such a venture.
 
No court confusion here.

'Legal highs' a no-no
DAVID KILLICK | February 24, 2011 12.01am

A THRIVING business selling "legal highs" has landed a Howrah storeman in court after his Chinese supplier sent him several kilograms of a banned drug.

Mitchell John Campbell, 23, pleaded guilty in the Supreme Court in Hobart yesterday to trafficking a controlled substance.

The charge relates to the sale of methylmethcathinone, a party drug also known as israelis, which started to turn up in Hobart in 2008.

Crown prosecutor Allison Shand told the court Campbell was arrested in May 2009 after police intercepted several bulk shipments of the drug from Shanghai.

A search of his house revealed several 1kg packages of white powder, thousands of empty pill capsules, two laptop computers and several thousand dollars in cash.

Campbell told police he had been ordering products from the Chinese Neo Organic website since 2009.

His internet-based business, called Neobase, sold herbal highs which Campbell believed were legal, although he became suspicious when the powders he ordered arrived labelled as "bath salts".

The estimated value of drugs Campbell possessed or sold could be several hundred thousand dollars, the court heard.

Emails revealed he had discussed buying up to 50kg of the drug for up to $250,000.

Defence lawyer Jim Wilkinson told the court his client had started a legitimate business but had been led astray by his suppliers who told him the drug was legal in Australia.

"He believed everything he was doing was legal, however he was young and naive," Mr Wilkinson told the court.

Justice Shan Tennent will sentence Campbell on Tuesday.

The Mercury
 
Top