• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

News: 'Sniffing' sensors set to be unveiled

technix

Bluelighter
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Messages
50
'Sniffing' sensors set to be unveiled
Friday Oct 13 21:40 AEST

University of Newcastle scientists say they could revolutionise border security with new chemical sensors which can detect explosives and illegal drugs.

The sensors, which "sniff out" illicit substances, are coated onto walk-through screening devices similar to the metal detectors already in use at airports.

Associate Professor Adam McCluskey, who is leading the research team, said the new technology would be quicker and up to 100 times cheaper than current methods of detecting explosives and drugs.

At present positively identifying suspicious substances involves lengthy laboratory tests.

"With our technology the drug would be detected on a person, in luggage or in cargo, and correctly identified in a matter of seconds, just by that person or item being near one of the sensors," Prof McCluskey said.

The Australian Research Council has awarded the University of Newcastle scientists nearly $400,000 over three years to develop the technology.

The researchers, who are working with Australian Federal Police, say they could have a prototype device within 18 months.
Ninemsn
 
Jimity said:
.........shit

yeah i think that just about sums this up..

will be interesting if infact this device does become standard and scans everyone leaving/entering the country and all cargo to see what ways will be used to counter this?
 
god damn these mother fuckers who manufacture these products, but I guess technology like this was gonna arise sooner or later. :X
 
Damn I hate us not having any land borders! Here's hoping this proves to be difficult unwieldy and fails to live up to expectations.:D ;)
 
They would set the scanners to not pick up on small amounts of drugs surely.
 
^^^I dont think anyones worried about small amounts. The MDMA/cocaine/whatever needs to get here in the first place dont froget...
 
I thought any significant amounts of MDMA or cocaine were shipped over in crates on those massive barges?

So wouldn't this not really affect supply in the slightest?
 
Small amounts? Sure they're interested in small amounts. A small amount of heroin may indicate you're carrying 50 grams internally. A small amount of MDMA may indicate a well concealed package of 10000 pills.

The thing is, customs authorities want to record/ track/ monitor each and every traveller who admits using a prohibited substance. Any admission, even as a casual or occasional recreational user will likely change the person's travelling life forever.

A few years ago an old friend was returning from OS. While away he hung out with a party crew who larged it up in doors due to the local cold rainy weather. When he returned customs found traces of MDMA and Coke on his clothes, which he'd not washed and had hurriedly packed.

Despite over an hour of the same questions regarding why he would have traces on his clothes, he refused to admit he knew anything about the drugs. However, realising they weren't intending to let him go without an explanation, he finally admitted that many of his friends were users, but that he himself never used drugs. That wasn't good enough for the anal eager customs officers and a cavity search preceded. Still, his opinion was that it's better to have that than to admit to anything illegal to a customs officer. He cited examples of where friends had admitted to personal use and were searched each and everytime they left or entered the country - not to mention the troubles experienced upon arrival in other countries. He has travelled since and afaik he's never been searched. The secret of course is new clothes, new wallet, new bags..... In fact nothing is taken that has ever been in contact with anything at anytime.

These chemical sensors are nothing new, but until now they were not sensitive enough or specific enough to employ in this area. But as lil angel15 pointed out, such devices will also facilitate the development of better and less expensive analytical devices for pill testing. It might be some time off but we might eventually even see a handheld model designed for home use. Of course it would be marketed to those nosey parents who have no relationship to speak of with their children and have to resort to such measures just to find out what they are up to. Hey, it'd be cheaper than hiring a spy.
 
I doubt this would affect importation of large quantities, as I expect most large shipments would not go through airports, and I very much doubt that much arrives being carried by individuals on (or in) their person. The thing I worry about is that this would be employed in the place of sniffer dogs at raves/clubs. It would make it neigh impossible to bring in a personal stash - I know I would soon be switching to aMT for going out.
 
"said the new technology would be quicker and up to 100 times cheaper than current methods of detecting explosives and drugs"..... what about efficiency?

What will it prove? That people have particles on drugs on their clothing. What does this infer? That they are drug couriers? WRONG.

There was a really interesting article from a club night in Brighton where a high ranking Police officer from Sussex Police force had insisted on using an Ion machine on the front door to allow entry. Anyone testing positive was denied entry. So the promotor of the night asked to test the hands of the Police officer and lo and behold he tests POSITIVE for Heroin and rather graciously admits the machine and procedure is flawed and removes it from the night. Might be a bitch patchy on the exact details but that was the story. A classic.

You see all those twats on Border security start to intimidate people at the desk to try and get a reaction. A nervous reaction or fidgety behaviour and they are more likely to take a deeper look. They make out having trace amounts of drugs on your hands is a crime!
 
phase_dancer said:
It might be some time off but we might eventually even see a handheld model designed for home use. Of course it would be marketed to those nosey parents who have no relationship to speak of with their children and have to resort to such measures just to find out what they are up to. Hey, it'd be cheaper than hiring a spy.

And if they were to expand the library within these handheld sensors, jealous and paranoid partners would be able to use it to sniff out pussy or cock. =D

Just a thought.
 
phase_dancer said:
Of course it would be marketed to those nosey parents who have no relationship to speak of with their children and have to resort to such measures just to find out what they are up to. Hey, it'd be cheaper than hiring a spy.
The politically correct term is private investigator, not spy :p
 
Don't worry 18 months till prototype.. 4yrs till we see them every where. 1984 here we come!! I think I'll leave this country if they start doing this.. their all just veiled attempts to prosecute peoples illegal private lives! They can tout that "stops bombs" shit all they want.. how many planes have been blown up recently... none! How does this make anyone feel safer, maybe the line was crossed a long time ago but it's getting ridiculous... Who'd have thought that sci-fi cynicism would ever be so close to reality... to sum up this rant:
.........shit
8(
 
to the cops: hey i'm only joking fellas.

damn those killjoys. i reckon we all should hire some islamic terrorists to blow up the university of newcastle.

*phlegm passes around a collection plate*

=D
 
What's missing from the above article is specific information on the range of chemicals these devices can detect. There's been much talk over the past few years regarding the applications of organic semiconductors and their advantages over inorganic semis. Wiki gives a good intro into history etc.

Wikipedia: Organic Semiconductors

Here's another article.


Revolutionary chemical screen for Australia's border protection
Friday 13 October 2006

Scientists at the University of Newcastle are developing a way to screen people and cargo for illicit drugs and explosives, in a new approach to border protection and security.

A team from the University's Priority Research Centre for Organic Electronics, is working with the Australian Federal Police to develop new chemical sensors which can detect explosives and drugs such as heroin, cocaine and amphetamines.

The sensors can literally be stuck to the inside of cargo containers or coated onto walk-through screening devices, similar to the metal detectors at airports.

Associate Professor Adam McCluskey is leading the team, and said the sensors would provide an easy and cheap way to detect chemicals of interest.

"The sensors essentially 'sniff' out' the explosives and drugs and alert authorities to their presence," he said.

"Our technology allows rapid and specific detection of illicit substances. At the moment each suspicious substance is subjected to multiple presumptive colour tests, where it is placed into small testing bags with a chemical to see if the liquid turns a certain colour.

"In cases where multiple substances are detected, this process needs to be repeated, making it both time consuming and expensive. A positive match can currently only be made after exhaustive laboratory-based analysis.

"With our technology, the drug would be detected on a person, in luggage or in cargo, and correctly identified in a matter of seconds, just by that person or item being near one of the sensors.

"The technology could be applied at airports, subways and railway stations - in fact, at any major transit hub. It could also be used in covert operations."

Professor McCluskey said the technology could be up to 100 times cheaper than the current methods of detecting explosives and illicit drugs at Australia's borders.

The Centre will receive almost $400,000 from the Australian Research Council over three years for the project, and could have a prototype electronic device available within 18 months.

The University's Priority Research Centres bring together researchers across health, energy and the environment, and science and engineering, to embark on research driven by stronger strategy and maximising their competitive strengths.

For interviews: Professor Adam McCluskey on 02 4921 6486.

link


As I imagined, these devices appear to be versatile enough to be used in all manner of situations such attaching to the walls of containers, doors, transport entrances etc. or eventually being placed like invisible "cameras" over any laneway, shop door or public - private [?] area. A couple of my older posts forecasted a time when everything would likely be monitored in this manner. Of course explosives and similar chemicals will probably be the main focal point to the argument of why these devices must be fitted everywhere.

What begs to question is how far this would or could go.

And if they were to expand the library within these handheld sensors, jealous and paranoid partners would be able to use it to sniff out pussy or cock.

[Sunday 1984/ Brazil Related Rant]

Far fetched as it may seem, it's conceivably possible that by measuring a particular selection of amines given off as body scents during sex, such a device could reveal if you had had sex with someone other than your registered partner - who's "sexual chemical signature", along with yours, would, at the time of marriage have been entered into your required home chemical sensor unit. This unit of course would also be linked to a central database which analyses results from millions of sensors placed nationwide. You might even end up being arrested for smelling like you had previously smoked a cuban cigar ;) .... As voters we just have to ensure no extremely conservative, religious inclined, self righteous government ever get's into office which has a "duty to God" policy aimed at preventing citizens from committing such sins .... Oops! 8o

[/]

Back to reality. It's also worthwhile appreciating that institutions all over the world are also working in this field and that many journals on organic semiconductors are presently in circulation. There are also immense benefits to be derived from this technology such as nano scaled drug delivery systems, personal health monitoring, and of course the portability and versatility that will come in the form of future consumer electronics. There's also considerable environmental improvements gained from moving away from the energy hungry and polluting industries involved with metal oxide based semiconductors.

Edit fixed some grammatical errors
 
Last edited:
Here's a wee bit more of the science behind the technology. Interesting to see the first reactions from authorities who think bag searches will always be required regardless of emerging technology.

Airport sniffer dogs safe from dole

Judy Skatssoon
ABC Science Online


Wednesday, 16 August 2006

Heathrow Airport
The terrorism alert caused chaos at Heathrow Airport last week. But could new security technology prevent a repeat performance?

No matter how sophisticated airport security technology becomes, it will probably never remove the need for sniffer dogs and bag searches, experts say.

The alleged foiled terrorist plot that affected flights between the UK and US last week has led to calls for newer, smarter security technology.

Devices on the horizon include insect-based sensors, wallpaper that sniffs out explosives as you walk past and smart closed-circuit TV that can pick a suspect out from a crowd or tell if you've left a bomb under a seat.

But Martin Cebis, whose company will present its all-in-one chemical sensing and surveillance system at an international military technology conference in the US next week, says would-be terrorists will probably always be one step ahead of technology.

"Ultimately you're dealing with human ingenuity [and] you're fighting a moving target and need to be able to adapt," says Cebis, chief executive officer of Western Australia's Embedded Technologies.

"I think you'll still need searching and those kinds of things to occur."

Cebis is also among a number of speakers who will brief security advisors and researchers in Canberra on the latest developments today.

Chemical sensing

One of the emerging areas of security, particularly in light of the alleged plot to carry liquid explosives onto planes, is in chemical sensing.

Associate Professor Adam McCluskey of the University of Newcastle is an Australian researcher developing chemical sensors based on drug design technology.

The sensors are can be "screen printed" onto fabrics, paper, plastics and even wallpaper.

"It's basically a synthetic antibody," he says.

"We're applying drug design technology to generate polymeric scaffolds that specifically recognise the shape and electronics of the targeted molecule."


Despite new technology, airport sniffer dogs are unlikely to find themselves on the unemployment queue (Image: Reuters/Alessia Pierdomenico)
The technique has been used to identify cocaine and heroin and is being developed to pick up chemicals like TNT and triacetone triperoxide, the chemical used in last year's London Underground bombings.


"Instead of metal detectors we would have a bank of these sensors sucking the vapours off as you walk through," he says.

He says while sniffer dogs will still be able to go places electronic noses can't, sensing technology will be better able to detect specific substances.

Dr Michael Borgas, is an atmospheric scientist at CSIRO, which is developing an electronic nose to detect chemicals.

He says the future of airport chemical sensing lies in miniaturised devices.

Researchers at CSIRO are also looking to insects like fruit flies for inspiration.

"If you can understand how insects sense and act upon various volatile chemicals you'd hopefully be able to mimic that with electronic devices," he says.

"What you want is a hand-held device that can suck in tiny bits of air and detect the molecules that are in that air. In airports you'd just stick it in a [passenger's] bag."

Smart surveillance

Cebis says it will take more than high-tech chemical sensors, no matter how sensitive and discriminating they are.

"It's fine to have sensors all over the place but you've got to be able to make intelligent decisions," he says.

"The research challenge is to make cheap, sensitive, ubiquitous sensors coupled with smart surveillance technology."

Cebis says closed-circuit TV will eventually be replaced by "smart" digital video technology that uses biometric identification and motion recognition to hone in on specific individuals and behaviour.

"They look at a scene and if there's no motion they don't film anything," he says.

"Or a person may wander into a scene, deposit something and then move away. The fact that something was moving and now isn't [will be picked up]."

Ting Shan of National ICT Australia (NICTA) will outline advances in face recognition technology at a security technology conference in Canberra next week.

Shan says new face recognition algorithms have been developed by NICTA and University of Queensland that aren't befuddled by lighting, expression or angle of the face.

"It can synthesise a realistic frontal face image," he says.

Impact of a new security environment

Borgas says while the events in the UK have highlighted advances in security technology, he doubts they will be implemented overnight.

McCluskey hopes it will give governments an impetus to provide the research and development funds to allow some of the more promising ideas to bear fruit.

"Sometimes it takes an event of this nature to provide a significantly high profile and the government willing to take a chance on the technology," he says.

Cebis say all the technology in the world will never completely replace the most humble of checks.

"But whether they need to be as intrusive and time consuming as they currently are depends on the technology," he says.

Adapted from here
 
and smart closed-circuit TV that can pick a suspect out from a crowd
Cebis says closed-circuit TV will eventually be replaced by "smart" digital video technology that uses biometric identification and motion recognition to hone in on specific individuals and behaviour.
8o 8o Wow, the more I hear the safer I am! Just love the idea of cameras following me everywhere and practically documenting my behaviour 8) What happens if I wanna pick my nose.. like really good! Or scratch my nuts.. I don't want no $4 hr security guard watching that!
Fuck it, why not just go minority report or gattaga styles and have everyone deposit a blood sample or eye identification everytime they go into a public place that - would work far better than any of this new technology? :X
phase dancer
As voters we just have to ensure no extremely conservative, religious inclined, self righteous government ever get's into office
I know I sound like a cynic (it's cause I am) but this kind of intrusive technology is no longer associated with conservatism IMO. The War On Terror is the perfect opportunity to have any right leaning government tout the "if you don't support these measures it just shows you that the other party is soft on terror!" It's the perfect election line! And with the current weakness of the Australian opposition there's no way they'd even bring these public intrusion concernes into a debate - they look weak enough already.
This shit is freaking me out WAY too hard! I just finished reading 1984.. seriously things are shaping up to be this dire.
I just hope there is eventually a voter backlash that sets at least some boudaries! There's way to much margin for erra in systems like "video monotoring" or even the sniffing sensors to have them unleashed on the public. What ever happend the the "innocent until proven guilty" ideal? Now its just "guilty until we can prove your innocent", and I think that sucks! :(
 
Top