hoptis
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- May 1, 2002
- Messages
- 11,083
This has already been posted and discussed in this thread.
While I recognise that some individuals might use the drug testing kits you supply in an effort to protect themselves, there exists some concern that other individuals might exploit the kits to test illicit substances they plan to distribute. These same individuals may well have a considered interest in the continuing financial viability of your operation. This must be an enormous concern for an organisation committed to reducing the damage done by illicit substances.
Is Enlightened Harm Reduction aware of having inadvertently supplied an individual or group suspected of having an association with the sale of illicit drugs with drugtesting kits?
Sheesh, in terms of poor ovation skills, this guy's right up there with Pauline Hanson. First he says that telling people what's in their pills is bad, because it implies they're safe - then, in the next breath, he's saying that *not* knowing what's in them is dangerous. What a plonker.Whiny Pyney said:The message should have been clear to them: if you take synthetic drugs, you do not know what is in them and you could do yourself dramatic damage.
if you take synthetic drugs, you do not know what is in them and you could do yourself dramatic damage.
Drug test inquiry
SOUTH Australian Liberal MP Christopher Pyne is stepping up his crusade against illicit drug use.
He launched an inquiry yesterday into an organisation handing out drug-testing kits to so-called ravers.
Enlighten Harm Reduction has operated its pill-testing service for partygoers. In a wider campaign pushing to re-criminalise cannabis, Mr Pyne, the parliamentary secretary for health, has asked EHR to brief the Government on its activities. Mr Pyne has requested that the Melbourne-based group give a funding breakdown, including all donors.
http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,17487553%5E911,00.html
johnboy said:So what was supposed to be a private letter from him to me was just a media stunt. Quelle supris. This morning I went head to head with him again on ABC radio, this time on the local Adelaide station. Needless to say he looked stupid again, and when I say stupid I am only quoting the 50 year old guy who rang up to support us, as did every caller I heard. I will try and get a recording of this up as soon as possible.
IMO the Adelaide Advertiser is the worst of all the Australian newspapers for biased, tabloid-style reporting, and I'm including the Herald Scum and the Sunday Times (WA) in that.johnboy said:Check out how much more slanted this version from the Adelaide Advertiser is:
Cowboy Mac said:There is more to come on this. JB is doing the media rounds and will be on Triple J's 'Hack' tonight, updates to come.
People conducting pill testing without a research permit from the Minister for Health pursuant to Section 53 of the Controlled Substances Act1984, may be subject to prosecution for breaches of the Controlled Substance Act 1984, and such a permit should be sought prior to engaging in pill testing activity.
Action will be taken by police should they discover evidence of criminal offences arising from pill testing without such a permit at this or other events.
Maintaining the rave on testing of party drugs
By KATE MURRAY
THE overdose of four people who took a mystery green pill at a rave party has sparked a debate on the benefits of testing illegal drugs for harmful substances before people take them.
The victims ended up in hospital after taking pills at the Summer Enchanted Rave in Adelaide last Saturday night. Doctors said they had no idea of the pills’ content and that one woman who overdosed only took half a tablet.
Harm minimisation group Enlighten says the overdoses could have been prevented if it had been allowed to test pills and tell users what they contained. Enlighten tested pills at the Winter Enchanted Rave in July, but police warned them off about doing the same at last weekend’s rave.
‘‘We were instructed not to test and then these problems occur,’’ Enlighten founder John Davidson said. ‘‘Actions by our group could have prevented these overdoses.’’
Davidson said Enlighten has just bought a new ion mobility scanner, which will let the group scan pills and identify what they contain in seconds.
The Federal Government is holding a hard line on pill testing and other harm minimisation measures, arguing that demand reduction is more useful than harm minimisation. Parliamentary secretary for Health Christopher Pyne says that there is no evidence pill testing leads to a reduction in the problems caused by drugs.
‘‘Pill testers think they are providing a service the Government thinks they are acting illegally. We’re not going to meet on that,’’ he said. ‘‘We have a tough-on drugs policy and we will not be allowing them to test people’s drugs and hand them back.’’
Davidson points to research showing that ecstasy users who test their pills use less than they would otherwise.
‘‘If [the Government] spends $12 million telling people not to take ecstasy, and there’s a four-fold increase in ecstasy use in (the last) 10 years, that’s not my fault,’’ Davidson said.
Sydney St Vincent’s Hospital emergency department head Gordian Fulde supports pill testing at rave parties and festivals.
‘‘Anything that prevents these patients becoming ill or coming into emergency departments is a good thing,’’ he says.‘‘It comes down to the classic debate between people who have strong feelings about zero tolerance and people who believe in harm minimisation.’’
Davidson admits his group is acting illegally when it tests pills but argues it shouldn’t have to be.
There is no pill testing at Sydney’s major summer music festivals. Davidson said the organisers of events such as the Big Day Out, to be held at Homebush on Australia Day, prefer not to be associated with harm reduction activities such as pill testing.
(no link. this was taken from a scan of the paper article)