• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

NEWS: Herald Sun [06/10/2004] - 'Drug abuse soars'

hoptis

Bluelight Crew
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
11,081
Location
Melbourne
Drug abuse soars
Neil Wilson and Patrick O'Neil
6 Oct 2004

YOUNG Victorians are ignoring the tough-on-drugs message: dope and ecstasy use is soaring.

A Melbourne survey found two in three young adults used cannabis in the past 12 months, and one in three used ecstasy or other drugs.

The disturbing results come as the second phase of the Federal Government's $27 million anti-drug campaign remains frozen because of the election.

The Australian National Council on Drugs, led by Major Brian Watters, fears the campaign could be scrapped if there is a change of government. But a fellow expert said the anti-drug message was not working anyway.

Australian Drug Foundation youth drug studies director Cameron Duff said some bureaucrats had lost faith in the campaign.

"The Government knows it doesn't work but they keep putting money into it," said Dr Duff. "It has the political virtue so the parents and community can see that the government is doing something.

"But government insiders will tell you to your face -- it doesn't work."

The Prime Minster launched the Tough on Drugs program in 1997. The most recent addition was TV advertising (2001-03) showing a drug user in a body bag and parents discussing drugs with their children.

A pamphlet entitled Tough on Drugs was sent to parents, offering advice on talking to their children about drugs.

The ADF survey of 100 people between 18 and 30, mainly students, was taken in the city in late winter.

It found 63 per cent had tried cannabis in the previous 12 months, and 33 per cent had used ecstasy or other illicit substances. A similar study in 2003 found only 31 per cent had used cannabis in the previous 12 months and just 12 per cent had used ecstasy or other drugs.

The latest survey, taken at Federation Square and the State Library, showed 79 per cent of young adults would not think worse of someone who had used cannabis.

And 61 per cent thought cannabis use tolerable or acceptable, compared with 19 per cent who regarded it as irresponsible, and only 7 per cent who said it was wrong.

Of other drugs, 78 per cent saw them as prevalent and 49 per cent found their use wrong or irresponsible, but 36 per cent accepted it.

A separate state survey of Melbourne University students in June showed 90 per cent of drug users relied on friends for their primary drug information; 50 per cent also used non-government websites.

Dr Duff said the Federal Government had lost the trust of many people in their early 20s, who were confident they made well-informed decisions about the use of drugs.

The ADF survey was consistent with trends showing a majority had smoked cannabis before 20, but then exposure to ecstasy, speed and cocaine climbed dramatically.

"We face the problem of being utterly ignored by giving a preventative message," Dr Duff said. "We're trying to compete against these pro-drug websites and the problem is a lot of that material is factually based. They don't trust the Government any more because there's a view the Government has exaggerated the risks.

"As soon as they have a first puff of marijuana, 10 years of drug education goes down the drain."

Professor Margaret Hamilton, on both the Australian National Council on Drugs and the Premier's Drug Prevention Council, acknowledged a credibility problem for government campaigns among young adults.

She said the next phase of the federal anti-drug campaign was designed to win credibility among different sub groups of users -- if it goes ahead.

"The ads were not quite finalised when the election was called, and then the process stopped," she said.

From here

Also on the same page (5) of today's Herald Sun a story on Brain Watter's comments where he hopes to work with a Labor government on the next phase of the current anti-drugs campaign and calls the Greens lunatics.

There's also a chart listing the availability and common street prices of drugs which is a bit exaggerated and a news article on the Sydney girl who died after taking a Red Mitsubishi.

It also states that tomorrow the Herald Sun is publishing some sort of tirade about DRUGS AND THE NET... they must be getting bored with the election coverage it's drugs week at the Herald Sun! :( Get ready for misinformation central.
 
Okay.. found the other articles. Under the 'National' section.

Anti-drug chief blasts Greens
Neil Wilson
06 Oct 2004

HOWARD government drugs chief Major Brian Watters has branded the Australian Greens drug policy as "lunatic" but said he could work with a Latham government.

The chairman of the Australian National Council on Drugs conceded the "just say no" policy favoured by Health Minister Tony Abbott could be too simplistic when applied to drug addicts who had lost the ability to reason in face of physical addiction.

But he hoped an ALP government would proceed with the planned anti-drug advertising campaign suspended during the election, in spite of his close association with Prime Minister John Howard.

"With the exception of the lunatic Greens, all the parties I know don't want normalisation (of drugs), they wish to emphasise prevention," he said.

"Anyone who is tempted to dabble, the aim has to be to keep them out of the criminal justice system."

Greens policy advocates the controlled availability of cannabis at "appropriate venues".

The party proposes the investigation of regulation of the supply of ecstasy and unspecified drugs in controlled environments.

Maj Watters has been featured in Melbourne newspapers just 10 times in the past year, in contrast to his hardline, outspoken zero-tolerance stance before retiring from the Salvation Army.

He defended his low profile on the basis he had a bigger impact working as chairman of the council on drugs. "I've supported the Federal Government in totality, tough on drugs but compassionate towards those who become addicted," he said.

He defended the $27 million spent on the Tough on Drugs advertising campaign, despite criticism from some doctors and researchers that young adults were not taking notice of them.

Maj Watters said television advertising for the next phase of the two-stage anti-drug campaign, begun in 2001, was almost complete but had been halted because of the poll.

From here

And also...

Woman, 19, dies after taking pill
06 Oct 2004

POLICE issued an alert after a 19-year-old Sydney woman died after taking what was sold to her as an ecstasy tablet.

Investigators were told that the woman, from western Sydney, took half a tablet of a drug on Friday.

The drug, known as Orange CK or Red Mitsubishi, is believed to have been sold as a type of ecstasy.

The woman died in hospital on Sunday.

Police warned that people should not take Orange CK or Red Mitsubishi if they come across it.

From here

I expect that either Bluelight or PillReports will be mentioned in tomorrow's edition.
 
Watters really has no clue, i've even met him (although he won't remember me) - the last of the old prohibition dinosaurs. None of them [prohibitionists], seem to be able to get past the fact that people might actually want to use [and not abuse] drugs in the first place, rather than it being a giant moral failing of some description that can be "prevented" in children by having "the talk" and wasting countless taxpayer dollars on useless TV advertising campaigns that; one, have little to no effect (see the media effects argument) and two, simply raise people's exposure to the drugs in the first place...

Bring on the greens and sensible drug policy I say....
 
The dinasours will soon be exctinct!

Well, I think its time these people finally threw in the towel. All this money, time and effort have gone to almost nothing but waste.

A lot of the volunteers and people involved with rehab have absolutely no faith in the government and its ability to control drugs. Many have setup their own campaigns to combat excessive and uncontrolled abuse of drugs.

Many people have realised that the line between legal and illegal drugs is very blurred, as are the behaviours associated with their abuse.

My parents, who told me they would kill me if I used drugs. Did not kill me when I told them. My mother was quite surprised when I had 4-HO-DET at my old place and walked to my parents while tripping, then discussed with her the drug I had taken. She was amazed that I was pretty normal, I didn't kill anybody, didn't hurt anybody, didn't rob anybody... didn't lose umm ONE FUCKING JOB. In fact psychedelics helped me find another job. ;)

In the end my parents realised its not all bad. We all have our ups and downs... And its not always related to drugs. ;)

Its not too long now hopefully before a more rational approach to drugs will be present. My parents have realised this... Hopefully through responsible use we can show others that we as people can be trusted, our bodies don't need to be policed by the state.
 
johnboy said:
Yes they will, as I did an interview with them. Hopefully at least some of what I said will make it past the subs.

This was pubilshed today, even though it's been relegated to the inner pages, it's not in the online version so I might type/scan the article tonight if I get some time.

:)
 
Yup. Know how I found out? A Current Affair rang me at 7.45am and asked to interview me. No thanks. I asked them how badly had I been misquoted and they said it was very positive. Shrug. Wonders never cease.
 
I almost fell off my seat when I read these articles.

As far as misinterpretation is concerned, the article seems to give a good view of pillreports and its usefulness. Ofcourse, this article is coupled with the articles around it, one which is a call to back lab testing and two others about how the current government campaign against drugs is being ignored, which really seem to give the view that people in power are starting to open up to new ways of thinking in regards to drug policy.

Definately something I didnt expect to read in the paper today. I dont think they butchered your comments JB, tho I dunno what you actually said. But they dont make you look like a guttertrash junkie... and thats always a start :). It all definately tied in well and gave a positive feel about the whole thing. I love reading this kinda stuff in the paper!

stace.
 
It was almost exactly what I said, very faithful. The only slight change was I said 1 in 5 Australians in their twenty's have done ecstasy not just drugs. Other than that it was very good.
 
"As soon as they have a first puff of marijuana, 10 years of drug education goes down the drain."

Probabley because they come to the same conclusion as I did - Holy shit! I've been lied to! I'm not dead, I'm not a junkie and my life is still the same. The only thing that has changed is now I'm hungry.
 
Pseudo G said:
Probabley because they come to the same conclusion as I did - Holy shit! I've been lied to! I'm not dead, I'm not a junkie and my life is still the same. The only thing that has changed is now I'm hungry.

LOL.... And being hungry only helps improve the economy!
 
Top