• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

NEWS: 'Finely chop powder, alternate nostrils says taxpayer-funded guide to drugs'

lil angel15

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
7,827
Location
Australia
TAXPAYERS are funding a guide to snorting cocaine and other party drugs under the guise of AIDS prevention.

A four-page booklet, titled Routes of Administration, details ways to protect the nose when snorting powdered drugs using common house and office utensils.

It is published by the former AIDS Council of NSW, now known as ACON, which was set up to promote health and reduce HIV transmission in the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community.

The document includes tips such as: finely chop powdered drugs before inhaling, alternate nostrils and rinse nostrils after snorting.

After warning readers not to mix up their utensils with those of other people, the guide advises: "Using post-it notes with your name on is an easy way to keep track of your own equipment."

The booklet, which is available at ACON's offices and via the internet, also has guides to injecting, swallowing and other methods of ingesting drugs.

The only justification for the snorting guide is that Hepatitis C can be passed on from sharing equipment.

ACON receives 75 per cent of its $12 million budget from the State Government through NSW Health, but has been criticised by gay activists for its funding priorities.

Gay activist Gary Burns, most widely known as the man who sued radio broadcaster John Laws for vilification against homosexuals, said the guide was dangerous.

"It is way beyond harm minimisation. It is giving you a step-by-step guide to killing yourself," Mr Burns said.

"It is important to have harm-minimisation policies to a degree but at the same time, you shouldn't be spelling out [how to take drugs]."

Mr Burns, along with activists Shayne Chester and Peter Hackney, have called for NSW Health to dissolve the group.

Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore has written to Health Minister Carmel Tebbutt conveying the concerns of Mr Burns and seeking an explanation for the booklet.

ACON chief executive Nicholas Parkhill said the guide reproduced information from another booklet originally published by the organisation in December 2005.

He said it had undergone "rigorous" checks by drug and alcohol experts.

"Funding is provided to ACON in recognition that people in ACON's communities have higher rates of drug use than the mainstream Australian population and that they are at elevated risks of harms as a consequence," Mr Parkhill said.

"This is not a 'how to use drugs guide' but a 'how to reduce the harms associated with drug use guide'."

ACON removed the resource from its website last week, only to re-upload it hours later with a message that read: "This information is not intended to encourage the use of illicit substances but to assist people and communities reduce the harms associated with injecting drug use."

A NSW Health spokesman said the harm reduction strategies in no way condoned drug use.



NEWS.COM.AU
 
It is way beyond harm minimisation. It is giving you a step-by-step guide to killing yourself," Mr Burns said.

Bullshit, If it reduces the transmission of HIV and all the other disease's, it is HM right?

For those looking for the booklet, click here
 
It's just like saying a guide for correct condom/lubrication use when having anal sex is a taxpayer's funded guide to buttfucking.
You can already tell by the tone, i.e. using words like 'taxpayer', that this is biased reporting at its worst... :\
 
Why alternate nostrils? Just to divide the effect so that neither one bears the full brunt of it? There are times I am stuffy on one side and snort only on the other side.

And ... post it notes on your snorting equipment? Yeah I can see sticking a posty to a straw ... kinda crazy.
 
^ As it seems to be a brochure about avoiding transmission of diseases, I assume that you are correct about taking the full brunt off just one nostril so as to prevent bleeding.
 
Doesn't really surprise me some asshole pro prohibition journalist has written something like this on a slow news day, it does fucking suck though. Hopefully people see it for what it really is and there is no further mention of this, it would be a damn shame if a good HR resource was put to an end as a result of this tripe.

Its actually more surprising to me that a considerable portion of this organisations funding comes from the Government than it is we have some prick journo trying to shit on legitimate HR.
 
It's just like saying a guide for correct condom/lubrication use when having anal sex is a taxpayer's funded guide to buttfucking.
You can already tell by the tone, i.e. using words like 'taxpayer', that this is biased reporting at its worst... :\

Tax payer dollars are also used to shoot people in the head which last time I looked was pretty terminal.
 
Yeah that looks brilliant. Am I high or are the Gov. doing something right?

Actually, what happens on the ground is different to the tough on drugs rhetoric that you often get in the government and media. HR is the standard approach on the ground when it comes to giving advice to drug users. My brother got arrested and charged with possession of weed recently and he had to do a "cautious with cannabis" course. They didn't tell him not to use drugs once during the whole thing, and the pamphlet they gave him is full of genuine info about cannabis, which isn't sensationalistic or overhyped.
 
Why alternate nostrils? Just to divide the effect so that neither one bears the full brunt of it? There are times I am stuffy on one side and snort only on the other side.

My left nostril has always been fully or semi blocked. I was into speed quite heavily for a time so I always used my righy nostril to snort. These days, nearly 10 years after abusing any kind of amphetamines my "good" nostril starts bleeding for no apparent reason, especially in summer. Sometimes a sneeze brings it on, other times there's really no reason at all.

I'd say that's good harm minimilization advice.
 
good info for the prevention of Hep and herpes etc
and habitual intranasal dosing can be very damaging to the nasal passage so while perhaps a little misguided, the information could be beneficial.
 
Last edited:
Isn't it in our constitution or something freedom of speech and freedom of information, I can see exceptions if it's instructions how to make things with intent to hurt e.g weapons. But for a way to see less harm to ppl who will use anyway is ludacris
 
As far as I'm aware we don't have freedom of speech in our constitution. :(
 
Top