if most people are saying "yeah man, it's proper wicked" then it might be worth a shot, if most are saying "nah man it's fucking shite" then it probably isn't. I have chosen not to buy camfetamine because I have ascertained that most people don't think it's very good- I don't need more information than that, I've done crappy stims before and can fill in the gaps myself. In this way, I have found all the "camfetamine is shit" posts to be helpful. Thanks for taking the time out of your busy day to have a whinge though, always appreciated
.
Yeah and I'm terribly sorry for having a go at you, I was probably in an irritable mood. Still, I think that type of post is "shite", loads of people were saying MPA was "shite" or words to that effect when it first became available, now some of those same people have changed their minds, presumably having realised that it's effects are actually not just "shite" and indeed can be "quite good". It seems that people are looking for a replacement for some other drug (e.g. meph) and when they don't get the exact same effects the new drug is "shite". Well yes, it is shite if the other drug is the one you really want.
I'm sure there are many users on the board who respect your opinion, but then there will be many users who have no idea of your opinion, but they might see "Senior Moderator" and assume your opinion is to some extent predictive of their own. You might reasonably say it's their own fault for jumping to that conclusion, but it's surely better to try to keep the information available here as objective as we can. Some people are not too bright, or are too lazy or perhaps just lack the confidence to do thorough research, but that's all the more reason for trying to keep the quality of information high. A lot of people who read BL are not even registered users, they might not even know about BL but just come across posts via a google search. There is also the fact that differences in enjoyment of a drug are not simply about individual taste, but also individual biology, and there is no way readers can judge your biology and compare it to their own, no matter how many of your posts they have read.
As a Senior Mod do you not think you have a responsibility to maintain a relatively high standard of drug-related information in your posts? Or take pride in doing that? Perhaps you don't see that as your responsibility, maybe BL itself doesn't see that as your responsibility, but I think it should be, because those who have Senior Moderator under their name will
tend to have their opinions held in higher regard than those without. I would think that it also carries the responsibility of a being a role model of sorts. Not that people will say "Vader is my role model" but more in the sense of contributing to the overall tone in a proportion greater than the number of your posts.
As for O-DT being weak, there are plenty of respected and opiate/opioid-experienced people who think otherwise. A lot of the discussion takes place over on Other Drugs, and many people in EADD don't venture outside EADD. I'd been posting here for months before I looked at the OD forum. I took 60mg O-DT tonight and I've been pleasantly struggling to keep my eyes open. It's weird because I've been using it fairly regularly for a couple of months now yet I don't seem to have developed any noticeable tolerance. I try not to use it every day, and I keep binging behaviour for weekends.
Thanks for giving me the opportunity to have another whinge, I do enjoy it!
