• BASIC DRUG
    DISCUSSION
    Welcome to Bluelight!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Benzo Chart Opioids Chart
    Drug Terms Need Help??
    Drugs 101 Brain & Addiction
    Tired of your habit? Struggling to cope?
    Want to regain control or get sober?
    Visit our Recovery Support Forums
  • BDD Moderators: Keif’ Richards

New drug comparison diagram you all should follow

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

danvb329

Greenlighter
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
31
ibotenic acid may have to be nudged a little maybe but THATS IT.

this is not controversial stuff, only drug gurus should reply to this message

I actually don't really use this forum. The shroomerys been down and I was so excited to share this

I want it to replace the old 2 models and yes I'm going to make it into a poster plus I will make a graphical hand drawn one with as many plants as I can fit

think of it as a rectangle stretched map of the world. Everything is in the right spot but of unknown size

EDITED: FIXED LSD ROtation. I feel a bit better today
I think it prooves a crucial message about the super 3d liquid light projector graphic this would have with more than earth(hemp grain and firewood) wind(mescaline hehe awesome to call a mesc trip wind) , water(green leaves wine and sativa), and fire as carbon itself and psychedelic universes black holes and alternate existence. The purple section tells you you can photoshop right over this with the color tool but don't actually do that. you dont see me doing that. The purple section is diamond, as opposed to graphite or something
drugs2.jpg

original version: http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/8186/drugsfw.jpg
 
Last edited:
sorry I love amphetamine but considering the simplicity of the rest of the chart,

its toxic with years of use and everyone knows its too similar to coke
 
I like it a lot, but you're missing a lot...

Amphetamines, both regular and methamphetamine.
Barbiturates, benzodiazepines and the Z-drugs.

RCs
 
The disclaimer at the top is scientifically ridiculous, just so you know.

-->bdd
 
no im sorry for not filling in them all

just getting the major ones before i do the rest. u think i should just open 3ds max?
 
No what I honestly think is you should cancel this project of yours as drug classification is in no need of revision.
Nothing I see up there is based off of chemistry, only very weak pharmacology. And I don't think this is how compounds should be defined.
I'm not trying to rain on your parade I just don't think this is necessary.
 
delta_9 said:
No what I honestly think is you should cancel this project of yours as drug classification is in no need of revision.
Nothing I see up there is based off of chemistry, only very weak pharmacology. And I don't think this is how compounds should be defined.
I'm not trying to rain on your parade I just don't think this is necessary.
Click to expand...

you totally ruined his parade
 
SRQRR.gif


This is the original image we're looking at.

In terms of aesthetic appeal, it looks like someone designed it in MS paint in the late nineties. I would love to see the above chart redesigned in a high-resolution, info-graphic style.

If we're going to debate revision/addition/reclassification, lets do it based on this original, complete chart.
 
Last edited:
Methadone84 said:
you totally ruined his parade
Click to expand...

My intention was not to "rain" on it, so I suppose I'm in the clear? ;)

dokomo, even if that diagram were blown up 10000X it still might not be able to include all the possible psychoactive analogs and their effects, which is why I am against these kinds of projects.
I'm not saying don't do it. By all means if you feel it necessary then continue, but be aware it will unfortunately never be fully complete :\
And there's the issue of compounds which are so ambiguous people will argue to death as to where in the diagram they should go.
 
after looking at your new diagram... I have no idea why its a chart we should all follow.
sorry to also rain on your parade..

yeah the original one is messy but it is more informative. The new fancy looking one is way too simplified and lacking too many popular drugs
 
amphetamine should be at 4:00 quite near the edge rotated 40degs CCW

also the cannabinoids themselves. def separate sativa indica anyway
 
Last edited:
No offense but the chart is, imo, wrong. It also doesn't really make sense to have "Cannabis" as a whole 1/4 area and Nartcotics should be called depressants. If you wanna make it 3d I'd change Cannabis to Cannabinoids, Narcotics to depressants, add opiates / opioids and add dissociatives behind and in front of the image. Oh and add alot more drugs.

That chart is not 3d.

SRQRR.gif


That graph, imo, is better and more accurate. Perhaps if you wanted to make a 3D graph you should improve on that one and forget about your one. No offense, though. You've done more than i have bothered doing ;)
 
delta_9 said:
^Why would you separate them? There are less than a half dozen active cannabinoids found in the plant and they are present in both species.
Click to expand...

You get synthetic cannabinoids (JWH's, etc).. Each with slightly more or less stimulating / psychedelic properties..
 
Yes, and he made no mention of them. He said he was wanting to separate sativas, and indicas, both of which contain all the active compounds, albeit in different ratios.
Hell, why not separate plant from plant? Since we all know plant A is 10% THC and plant B is 15% THC 8(

Had he said something of them, I may have agreed. Although as I've said this whole 'drug label chart' thing is silly IMO. It seems like something that belongs on a police station wall where they put the D.A.R.E. and the scared straight kids or something.

But, as I've also said, if one feels the need to truly do it, the don't let me or anyone else stop you. :)
 
I'm sorry but this chart is totally useless. Not only is it ridiculously over-simplified but it's not based on science.

And more annoyingly ... Opium?! What about the massive range of opioids (all with different sorts of effects), some are more stimulating whereas others are sedating. Opium is just far far too generic. And benzodiazepines? Z-drugs?

Also, your 'sentence' at the top makes no sense at all. Drugs for sleep disorders and bi-polar disorders are psychoactive, that is how they work. Psychoactive means that they cross the BBB and exert their effects on the CNS - isn't that what your 'chart' is entitled, CNS medicines?!

Ridiculous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top