• CD Moderators: nepalnt21
  • Cannabis Discussion Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules

New bill trying to federally unschedule marijuana

Call this fucking idiot. Mod feel free to re-post as a new thread if you think it would get more views and possible calls.

http://www.tokeofthetown.com/2011/06/cretin_congressman_from_texas_holds_up_marijuana_r.php#more

Cretin Congressman From TX Holds Up Marijuana Legalization

By Steve Elliott ~alapoet~

Friday, June 24, 2011, at 11:57 am

lamar_smith.jpeg (warning he looks like redhead g w bush; visit link to see)

Photo: America's Voice

Take a gander at this Howdy Doody-looking asswig (Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas). It only takes one moron to hold up the progress of an entire nation of 300 million people, when it comes to ending marijuana prohibition. (If this clown truly represents the 21st District of Texas, I feel sorry for y'all.)
​What's that? You're excited about the Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act, are you? You're invigorated by the idea of saving millions of taxpayer dollars, and finally putting law enforcement priorities where they belong?

Maybe you're pumped about the possibility the these United States could finally end the 74-year-old nightmare of cannabis prohibition, and stop putting people in cages for growing and using a demonstrably harmless plant?

Well, simmer down, weed lover. It seems that the opinion of one good-old-boy Congressman from Texas outweighs yours.

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), also known for his anti-immigrant policies, has said his House Judiciary panel will not consider the Barney Frank/Ron Paul bill. Period.

Smith's opposition to sane marijuana policies shouldn't come as any surprise. After all, back in 2009 when the Obama Administration announced it would no longer prioritize going after medical marijuana patients and providers in states where it is legal, Smith was against that, too, stridently calling for the Justice Department to "enforce federal marijuana laws."

"By directing federal law enforcement officers to ignore federal drug laws, the Administration is tacitly condoning the use of marijuana in the U.S.," Lamar said at the time. "If we want to win the war on drugs, federal prosecutors have a responsibility to investigate and prosecute all medical marijuana dispensaries [italics added] and not just those that are merely fronts for illegal marijuana distribution."

Apparently in Lamar Smith's ugly little redneck world, it's not OK even for seriously ill patients to smoke that marry-jew-wanna stuff.

So of course it was to be sadly expected that Lamar would say equally asinine things about this legalization bill, too -- and he didn't waste any time in doing so.

"Decriminalizing marijuana will only lead to millions more Americans becoming addicted to drugs and greater profits for drug cartels who fund violence along the U.S.-Mexico boarder," Smith said of the new Frank/Paul legalization bill. "Allowing states to determine their own marijuana policy flies in the face of Supreme Court precedent."

Smith's statement ignores the facts from countries like Portugal and the Netherlands which have relaxed their cannabis laws, only to see usage go down, in the general populace and especially among youth.

And the cowboy Congressman also conveniently ignores history. After alcohol Prohibition was repealed, are the bootlegging gangsters the ones who reaped the profits in a regulated system? Of course not, and the drug cartels wouldn't be reaping profits from legal pot, either.

Just to make a clean sweep of it and make his statement entirely fact-free, Smith was also wrong about the Supreme Court, which has never held that the Constitution requires Congress to criminalize cannabis.

As pointed out on the excellent blog Absurd Results, "Smith has the Constitutional issue exactly backwards." Because a Constitutional amendment was required to outlaw alcohol, it follows that Congress is currently violating the Constitution by criminalizing marijuana without an amendment expressly granting the federal government that power, the current Supreme Court's insane interpretation of the Commerce Clause notwithstanding.

Now, we all know that this half-wit Texan already has his mind made up, so maybe there's not much we can do about that. HOWEVER. What we CAN do is to make every single day of the rest of his life an occasion upon which he was reminded of his rank stupidity.

Here's Rep. Lamar Smith's contact info. Let him know what you think of the fact that he is now, by his own choice, the man responsible for continuing marijuana prohibition in the United States.

You can get started by emailing Lamar (click here), but this "man of the people's" website makes you put in your zip code to do so (handy way to reduce citizen input), so you're going to need to be from the 21st Congressional District of Texas to do that.

Meanwhile, you can call and write his offices:

Washington, DC Office
2409 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
ph: 202-225-4236
fax: 202-225-8628
8:30 am- 6:00 pm EST

San Antonio District Office
1100 NE Loop 410, Suite 640
San Antonio, TX 78209
ph: 210-821-5024
fax: 210-821-5947
8:00 am- 5:00 pm M-F

Kerrville District Office
301 Junction Highway, Suite 346C
Kerrville, TX 78029
ph: 830-896-0154
fax: 830-896-0168
8:00 am- 12:00 pm M-Th

Austin District Office
3532 Bee Cave Road, Suite 100
Austin, TX 78746
ph: 512-306-0439
fax: 512-306-0427
8:00 am-1:00 pm M-Th
 
^^you must have a raging boner 24/7 b.c marijuana legalization/decriminalization has been proposed quite often
 
^^you must have a raging boner 24/7 b.c marijuana legalization/decriminalization has been proposed quite often

Yeah at this point, it's pretty much a never ending argument. Usually this stuff belongs in Drugs In The Media but since this is related to marijuana and has some conversation I'm gonna leave it here for now --- keep it pleasant guys, or I'll have to move it or close it.
 
HR 2306: Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2011

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Please contact your state representative and let your voice be heard! Numbers make a difference! I'm counting on you guys!

http://action.cannabispolicyreform.org/page/speakout/legalize-marijuana
Information:

Support of facebook as well.
http://www.facebook.com/legalize2011


Support Marijuana Legalization on Facebook:USA: Members Of Congress Introduce First Federal Measure Since 1937 To Legalize The Adult Use Of Marijuana -- Bipartisan Coalition Backs The 'Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2011'
norml / 6/23/2011





Washington, DC: House lawmakers introduced legislation in Congress today to end the federal criminalization of the personal use of marijuana.

The bipartisan measure -- HR 2306, the 'Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2011' and sponsored by Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank and Texas Republican Ron Paul along with Reps. Cohen (D-TN), Conyers (D-MI), Polis (D-CO), and Lee (D-CA) -- prohibits the federal government from prosecuting adults who use or possess marijuana by removing the plant and its primary psychoactive constituent, THC, from the five schedules of the United States Controlled Substances Act of 1970. Under present law, all varieties of the marijuana plant are defined as illicit Schedule I controlled substances, defined as possessing 'a high potential for abuse,' and 'no currently accepted medical use in treatment.'

Said Rep. Frank, "We do not believe that the federal government ought to be involved in prosecuting adults for smoking marijuana."

Said Rep. Cohen, "The federal government shouldn’t be spending its time on marijuana."

The 'Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act' seeks to federally deregulate the personal possession and use of marijuana by adults. It marks the first time that members of Congress have introduced legislation to eliminate the federal criminalization of marijuana since the passage of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937.

Language in this Act mimics changes enacted by Congress to repeal the federal prohibition of alcohol. Passage of this measure would remove the existing conflict between federal law and the laws of those sixteen states that allow for the limited use of marijuana under a physicians' supervision. It would also allow state governments that wish to fully legalize and regulate the responsible use, possession, production, and intrastate distribution of marijuana for all adults to be free to do so without federal interference.

Speaking today at a press conference in support of the measure, NORML Executive Director Allen St. Pierre said, "The federal criminalization of marijuana has failed to reduce the public's demand or access to cannabis, and it has imposed enormous fiscal and human costs upon the American people. It is time to end this failed public policy and to provide state governments with the freedom to enact alternative strategies -- such as medicalization, decriminalization, and/or legalization -- without running afoul of the federal law or the whims of the Department of Justice."

NORML, along with representatives from the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA), Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP), and the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), worked closely with members of Congress in drafting the measure.

For more information, please contact Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director, or Keith Stroup, NORML Legal Counsel, at (202) 483-5500. Additional information regarding this measure is available online at: End Marijuana Prohibition - NORML.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Was in Venice Beach on the way back to San Diego were every other storefront on the little road facing the beach are 420 MD offices. Spoke to a guy that 420 info. Anyway, he said that the doc were raided last week and had been harrased before- he said that cops were trying to build cases to get their medical liscenses revoked. What is more disconcerting is that it sounded like local authorities not the feds- but I forgot to ask.

Anyway, why the presence of canabis sold openly whether ostensibly or realy for medical reasons being a source of consternation for cops, residents, ect... in Venice Beach is absurd, but alot of the country is inflexible in their ability to think critically.

Anyway, if the heat is being turned up in CA and if Obama's Atorney General issued a statement a few weeks ago that he would issue arrest warants for any public official involved in administering the state's new med MJ policy is a very bad sign for decriminalization/ legalization. This is from an administration that promissed they wouldn't go after med cannabis in states were it is was already legal. Don't know the particulars about Arizona but I know they [assed an intiative soon after CA legalizing MJ (and heroin I think was included in its wording)- and the criteria were more stringeny than CA. I think they might have revised or passed a new initiative.

At any rate, the feds seem to be increasing the heat in CA after tolerating cannabis in CA. In fact, even though there are dispensaries all over the place in certain counties- enforecement of cannabis laws seem to be paradoxically more stringent in CA than the 70s-90s when most cops didn't care much about buds (I had cops give me back buds twice in San Jose in the early 90s/late 80s and this is pre prop215,) In many parts of the state- usually would confiscate it and send you off with a warning or maybe cite you and maybe tou would pay a small fine. Now I see a backlash comming.

Anyway, one thing that needs to happen is that the pro cannabis factions need to Unify. It makes me sick that prop 19 didn't pass in the emerald triangle- in this case because osyensibly because corporations like Marlboro would take over but realy because they didn't want to lose their tax free profit= especially from their product going east sold at a premium.

In this State its like the speak easies of the 20s, Cops know were they are, they are quasi legal or illegal depending on what law enforcement branch you work for- and the feds usually shut dispensaries down arbitrarily or in manners that are politically expendient (whatever works to preserve their budgets in an era of high debt and budget cuts- dispensaries are easy targets and busting them is easy to justify among middle americans stuck in outdated marijuana madness mindsets in southern and midwestern states populated by self-ritcheous narrowminded idiots and the people in more tolerant states that believe that self determination is anathema if its a behavior contrary to theirs in which case they subscribe to the very unAmerican notion that its the government's job to enforce morality.

Governments' job is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness- to provide a society were the individual is protected from coercision, fraud, or violence and perserve freedom, not deprive people of it. This is if one sticks to the core principles the USA was founded on clearly and unequivocally enunciated in the majority of the enlightened writtings of the Founding Fathers.

Cannabis prohibition in particular, like mind altering prohibition in general are counterrevolutionary, unpatriotic, unAmerican, setting aside the fact that George Washington was a Hemp farmer- these laws are illegitimate and just plane asinine, based in rascism, hysteria, and a belief that the average American is incapable of making mature decisions for themselves regarding how they spend money they earned on a substance they consent to freely injest. The fact that this substance is relatively inocous, especially compared to alcohol, nicotine, and to a lesser extent scheduled Rx drugs, makes its illegality that much more absurd.

Well, I guess that ignorance is strength and obedience/oppression is bliss under the current regieme (or the for the last 100 years or so of the USAs history.):! Like boulders in a rushing river our sacred liberties and inalienable rights are insidiously eroded as time goes on. The rate increasing or decreasing on the size of the water table (as a function of big brothers' intrusion on our lives-some years increasing at a faster rate than others.)

Every time ending prohibition is proposed is a victory for harm reduction- adding alittle material to dam up the river even if all it does is provide a foundation for future growth.
 
Last edited:
^ Can you make a tl;dr version of that?

Yea- in CA enforcement against the whole medical MJ system is on the increase. Last week in venice beach their was a sweep of cannabis recommendation MDs. The Obama administration seems to be abandoning its promise of not enforcing federal laws in states were it is already legal. Arizona is another example were, though med MJ was voted in years ago, as the state was getting ready to implement a new system, they were threatened by the attonery general of the US with prosecution under federal law. In CA, state and local LEOs seem to be getting in on the enforcement act.

This is 1937 (MJ tax act) all over again with federal, state, and local LEOs trying to preserve their budgets in an age of austerity measures.

So even if this bill doesn't pass it lays a foundation for future anti- prohibitionist legislation by the very nature that their introduction helps build momentum. A new bill to regulate and tax cannabis has been formulated to be put on the ballot in 2012. So even if it doesn't pass its not wasted legislation.
 
^ Lol. "We'z gon put ur stait in jayl"

But isn't the DEA pretty separate from Obama? The head of the DEA makes the choices and has a lot more influence than Obama, right? Or did I think wrong?

But if they just god damn legalize it and put a tax on import and export, the recession would be over faster than Fox's reality channel(which lasted like a few months then got kicked off the channel lineup). Let companies mass produce it with a very expensive license, Marlboro joints. That'd bring in a ton of money and just make it so people can only grow like 4 plants at a time, then big stoners are more prone to go out and buy some newp blunts.
 
The DEA is 100% separate from everything. That is why they are so damn corrupt. They are not run by any particular branch, and their ops are reviewed by congress after the fact - not approved before.
 
Network- I agree in legalizing and taxing it. It sure will help the budget in CA in particular. It started out in the late 90s with a 12 billion dollar surplace now the worlds 8th largest economy is in dire finacial straights like a failed Euro state (eg Greece).

Using the California wine industry as a model their might be marlboro green or other mass produced inferior products just like there is a market for Gallo and other mass produced CA wines. But if legalized and regulated it should use the CA and French wine system of appelations/ AVAs as a model. There will always be a market for boutique, well grown cannabis. I belive their will also be a niche market for outdoor grown superior weed grown in prime areas (like Garberville where the elements come together. Also their will be a niche market for classic strains like Acapulco Gold, Panama Red, Zacutecas Purple, Jamaican Lambs bread, Alaskan Thunderfuck, Chocolate thai, and the classic California and Hawaian magic strains of yesteryear (grown outdoor organically.) And all these markets provide the potentially for increased revenue.

The DEA- yea- its a government within a government.
 
Top