Please use the info below in my signature to learn how to navigate and use our forum. Thanks. 
I want to add to Dev0r's post that things are further complicated by the sensitivity to these drugs being apparently very variable. I don't know that we can explain the lethality like ^that^, since seizures are normally not that dangerous and vasoconstriction has not been determined the cause of death. Before we know more about the mechanism of lethal side-effects it would be wrong for us to pretend we can tell each other conclusive things about the safety.
If you want to be safe, you shouldn't use drugs. Period. And if you want to be at least reasonably safe using psychedelics you probably shouldn't use the supernew, superpotent and potentially lethal kind... you'd better choose ones that are known to be psychologically hazardous in slight overdose at worst, or much better said: ones that have a big "therapeutic index", the margin that determines physical safety.

I want to add to Dev0r's post that things are further complicated by the sensitivity to these drugs being apparently very variable. I don't know that we can explain the lethality like ^that^, since seizures are normally not that dangerous and vasoconstriction has not been determined the cause of death. Before we know more about the mechanism of lethal side-effects it would be wrong for us to pretend we can tell each other conclusive things about the safety.
If you want to be safe, you shouldn't use drugs. Period. And if you want to be at least reasonably safe using psychedelics you probably shouldn't use the supernew, superpotent and potentially lethal kind... you'd better choose ones that are known to be psychologically hazardous in slight overdose at worst, or much better said: ones that have a big "therapeutic index", the margin that determines physical safety.
Last edited by a moderator: