• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: andyturbo

Movie Reviews Part 2 - The good, the bad and the ... rentals

Status
Not open for further replies.
Donnie Darko - Directors Cut!

Now established, director Richard Kelly has been given a chance to recreate his feature length debut film as he original intended. For those unaware of the original, Donnie Darko is a unique combination of science fiction and comic book madness set during the late 80’s where Jake Gyllenhaal stars as a borderline-schizophrenic adolescent. It’s a journey that will confuse at first but it all fits perfectly together towards the end of the movie. It also leaves enough clues for discussion after the experience and it’s always interesting (if not frustrating) to hear alternative conclusions by first time viewers.

The Future Movies team have been lucky enough to meet Richard when he flew over to London in October of 2002 to promote the original film, which at the time enjoyed only limited release in a handful of cinemas. Thanks to word of mouth and the Internet it got a re-release soon after. During Christmas 2003 it was BBC Radio 1 promoting the soundtrack song Mad World recreated by Gary Jules that help to push the original DVD to the mainstream and by this time the DVD was insultingly cheaper than a dodgy bargain bucket film! We cant wait for Richards second feature film but we regret he’s too much of a megastar now to ever appear on Future Movies for another interview (hint hint!).

This Director’s Cut will instantly hit you when the addition of a lot of music that the distributors didn't want to pay for the first time around was included, swapped and replaced in places. This version contained more than I expected including a number of new scenes not included in the huge amount of deleted scenes on the original DVD. The best scenes are often character-based, for example their is more about the likes of Grandma Death. Many scenes include added computer effects to clarified the story and make the film more accessible to newcomers, where the original film’s surrealist mystery gave it an instant cult status.

The DVD contains loads of extras including the director’s commentary with Richard Kelly and Kevin Smith, and is ideal viewing for devoted fans or for anyone aspiring to be a director. Just about everything here is explained, from Kelly's choice of music change to each separate character. The guys work well together and it is interesting to hear the views from Smith who is a lot more comical and laid back.

There is a 30 minute feature “They made me do it too” which focuses on the cult status of Donnie Darko and its response from UK cinema goers. Here we have interviews with fans and critics who adamantly explain that they had a far better understanding of the original theatrical release than the American audiences did. There are some interesting conversations from some of the fans about how they don't need to be spoon-fed conventional stories and ideas. Other notable extras include cast & crew interviews, "Mad World" music video, and TV spots amongst the usual trailers etc...

I recommend owning both DVD’s because the original can be purchased for less than 2 pints of beer and many fans will prefer it.



Extras List:

Disc One: Commentary with Richard Kelly and Kevin Smith.
Disc Two: ‘They Made Me Do It’ – UK Art Exhibition doc. ‘They Made Me Do It Too’ – The Cult Of Donnie Darko UK doc. ‘They Made Me Do It’ gallery. Donnie Darko Production Diary with optional commentary by Steven Poster, director of photography. B-roll footage. Interviews with cast and crew. Cast and crew filmographies. Director’s Cut trailer. Original theatrical trailer. Original TV Spots x 5. ‘Mad World’ music video. ‘Cunning Visions’ Infomercials x 2. ‘The Killing Moon’ Easter Egg. 20 scenes with optional commentary by Richard Kelly – deleted and extended scenes from the original theatrical cut DVD.



after loving the original, then watching the Directors Cut - I'd say that this movie is one of the best I have ever seen, the new Special Edition DVD I bought came with a hologram of Frank on the front, which when moved changed to The Philosophy of Time Travel diagrams, then to Jake....

it's probably one of the only movies I've watched that will actually bring a tear to my eye, although not many people find it "sad"..... this is definately a go-out-and-buy DVD, if you haven't seen it, even if you have.


I reckon I give this like a 10/10 because it was such a moving movie, not many movies have the same effect on me that this one did.
 
^^ heh, funny you mention 'Donnie Darko' cos i just hired it out again the other day. after having seen the original version a few times now i'd most definitely be interested in seeing the director's cut... if for no other reason than out of curiosity.

i have to say as soon as i heard this version was coming out though i was sceptical. it urks me a bit how they emphasis EVERYTHING IS EXPLAINED because i think ambiguity is good. and i like it as is. but like i said i'm very curious to see how the directors cut looks :)
 
^ nothing is explained, that's a bit offputting aswell, because I think the thing that made the original good was because really the movie was only what you thought it was about.

the directors cut just has additional scenes (deleted scenes from the first special edition DVD, then a few extra bits)


one extra bit that made more sense was in the end of the original you see Grandma Death when Frank gets shot, but no one knows why she is there...

in the Directors Cut, you see her walk out and talk to Jake Gyllenhaall (cant think of his name right now?)


:)
 
<3

06m.jpg

I watched 'Laurel Canyon' yesterday; by chance my housemates had rented it [free movie goodness] and I was bored.

I thought it was actually quite well made, despite the director [Lisa Cholodenko] admitting it was quite a small budget film.

The plot needed some work in places, but did its job to keep me intrigued until the end.
The cinematography gave it a beautiful ethereal feel and was really quite flawless in that respect. Being so visually pleasing really helped me to look past all of the low points.

The acting was beautiful - - a lot of heart and soul went into this from all of the actors, this much is clear.
Frances McDormand, Christian Bale, Kate Beckinsale, Natascha McElhone and Alessandro Nivola <3 are all provocative and compelling in their roles.
LaurelCanyon.jpg


It does get a little contrived, but all in all I really enjoyed this somewhat twisted drama with subtle comedic elements.

*** out of *****.
 
COLD MOUNTAIN,

Starring Nicole Kidman, Jude Law and Renee Zellweger.

This romance although at times a little sentimental and predictable is carried through with brillliant performances by Nicole Kidman but even more so from the talented Texan Renee Zellweger, in her we find a character that is rough, yet extremely charming.

The story revolves around the American Civil War and is about Love, war, courage, power, friendship and family relationships. This movie is an outstanding movie, and make sure you have plenty of tissues with you as there are some extremely moving scenes.

You'll like this if you enjoyed, The Hours, or the others.
 
It seems no-one has mentioned this (well not in the last 2 pages anyway) so here goes my review.

The Bourne Supremacy

Those that have seen the first movie, The Bourne Identity, will know that this is no run of the mill action movie. Sure there are fight scenes, car chases and explosions but the Bourne movies possess an important factor which separates them from the others.....realism.

Matt Damon excellently plays Jason Bourne, an ex CIA agent who has amnesia. The first movie sees the CIA trying to kill him as he continually finds himself able to cope with the treacherous situations thrown at him, without coming to terms with who he actually is. The Bourne Supremacy deals with Bourne taking the fight back to the CIA.

One of the great things about this movie is it's sense of immediacy. It really feels like the action is taking place in front of you, unravelling naturally. It's as if you are experiencing the action as opposed to watching it from a distance. Coupled with a clever script, director Paul Greengrass has managed to create an intensely realistic film. At no point in the film are you left thinking "yeah right, as if that could happen". It's the subtleties and lack of extravagance that make this such a good film.

The cast is excellent as well. It is definitely worth owning on DVD as the special features expand nicely on the film and give you an insight as to how they created the film to be what it is. The more interviews i see with Matt Damon the more respect i have for the man and his dedication to the craft of acting.

Great movie - watch it.

White Chicks

I saw this the other nite and being that i expected very little, i was pleasantly surprised. It was stupid, but funny. Good movie to watch when baked. The Wayans brothers are all quite talented and managed to pull off the film very well. Not a masterpiece but fun nonetheless.

Mean Girls

Much better than expected. Written by Saturday Nite Live personality Tina Fey (who also stars in the film) the sense of humour is quite perverse and refreshingly good. There are plenty of funny moments in this film and the script is good aswell. I've seen it a few times already and enjoyed it each time. Reccomended.

Adikkal
 
Well I saw Ocean's 12 last night at the movies but due to extreme tiredness slept through the larger part of it. What I saw was alright - nothing great, wait for video release...
 
BopGirl said:
Meet The Fockers = average


I quite liked Meet the Fockers . It made me laugh out loud several times, and I'm not usually a fan of that sort of humour. The kid who says "Asss- HOLE" as his first word... te he... and Ben Stiller is MUCH better in this one than the last one, funnier and less of an annoying git. Dustin Hoffman and Barbara Streisand are superb. Yeah it's predictable, but it's like Maccas' for the eyes .... a good movie to watch when you want something fast, fun and easy to digest =D

I rate it 7.5/10 (I would give the original 6/10)

I also watched Donnie Darko the director's cut the other day.... I must say I found it just as spectacularly intriguing and entertaining as the first, much more so actually, I couldn't peel my eyes away from the screen. But I'm fucked if I can work out how "everything is revealed"!?? Nothing is revealed! I'm still just as much in the dark about how things 'come together' as I was when I first watched it. Does he go forward in time and predict the consequences of him not getting hit by the airline engine, then choose to change that future? If so, how come the incident happens twice - ie. the parents refer to the jet engine accident in the second series of events? Do the mother and daughter die in the plane? I really didn't get it. Maybe I'm not that smart. But it's still a fabulous movie, it makes the first version pretty much redundant.

ps. LOVE the soundtrack, will be keeping an eye out for that one - I believe it's available in music stores.


Open Water - the one where the diving couple are stranded in the middle of the ocean with sharks.
To tell the truth, I was a *little* disappointed. I guess it was hyped up so much that you forget it's actually a low budget indie film. The idea of it was terrifying, but I couldn't suspend my disbelief enough to really get into it; which is odd since they used REAL sharks and based the events on a true story. Perhaps it was the very nature of the film and it's reality that stopped me getting absorbed because I am probably acclimatised to Hollywood-type tales which suck you in to a fantasy-land. I found it easy with this one to sit back and go: "yeah they're just actors". Or maybe I HAD to do that in order to let myself watch this... it was a bit of a brave choice for me, a certified horror-wimp.
But Open Water wasn't gory, or particularly gut wrenching or anything like that -just a bit sad. It left me feeling sad, particularly the very end... what a choice to make :(

ps. Guys, I am building up the courage to go see "SAW". I would love more Aussie opinions, particularly girls'.
 
The Motorcyle Diaries - 10 out of 10.

Really superb piece of film, charts the journey of a 20 something Che Guevera around America (south).

Not a political film, more a beautiful and picturesque romp through the span of human emotions and one of the few films I have seen to grab the audience and take them on a true journey.

I Love Huckabees - 8.5 out of 10.

All star cast, a movie for the thinkers - funny, intruiging, well acted and a concept well executed. Haven't seen anything like this.

Y tu mama tambien - 8 out of 10.

Done in the same vein as the Motorcycle Diaries with that very Spanish 'picturesque yet still highly real' feeling to the imagery.

Pieces of April - 7.5 out of 10.

Nothing bad about this heart warming alternative story about a girl gone slightly off the rails from her parents. Charts the emotional rift between a mother and her daughter as well as the personal conflict each party goes through. Colourful and entertaining, a great way to pass a few hours. Pick it up if your struggling to grab at the current new release crap.

Spun - 8.5 out of 10.

Bring on the crazy Meth addict stories. Starring the Capulet lead from William Shakespears R&J - as well as a few other notaries, Spun had me hooked (boom tish) with its blend of high paced action, sharp visual and auditory splicings, coupled to the hilarious intricacies of blowing up meth labs, chaining women to beds for large amounts of time and generally being off your face for countless days - this is a gem for any drug user and a wake up call if you think tweaking for a fortnight would be a breeze :)

Go get fucked up, get in front of a big tv with a few mates, turn the lights off, crank the sound up and watch Spun. Guarantee it will do heads in (think 'har har thats great' as opposed 'Please kill me' [ie Requiem for a Dream]).

***

Haven't watched it yet - but Amores Perros is at home and supposed to be another quality flick.

***

FYI = Rating's (Whats good? Whats not?)

10 = A brilliant piece of film that everyone should see - mind and heart expanding.

8 = Well executed, well acted and definately something to check out if your a movie fan.

6 = Sloppy stories or weak characters. It was produced and you watched it.. some parts were great, but dont write home just yet.

5 = Very general middle of the road - 'yeah it was on'.

4 = Well it passed 2 hours of my life... Hopefully I got *something* out of it.

2 = Maybe I could have just watched the wall for a bit.. that wouldnt have hurt as much.

EG: King Arthur is a 5.5 (to a 4.5 depending on how up you are with them inventing history [where the fuck did that wall come from?]).

Happy Moofie's people.
 
Strawberry_lovemuffin said:
I also watched Donnie Darko the director's cut the other day.... I must say I found it just as spectacularly intriguing and entertaining as the first, much more so actually, I couldn't peel my eyes away from the screen. But I'm fucked if I can work out how "everything is revealed"!?? Nothing is revealed! I'm still just as much in the dark about how things 'come together' as I was when I first watched it. Does he go forward in time and predict the consequences of him not getting hit by the airline engine, then choose to change that future? If so, how come the incident happens twice - ie. the parents refer to the jet engine accident in the second series of events? Do the mother and daughter die in the plane? I really didn't get it. Maybe I'm not that smart. But it's still a fabulous movie, it makes the first version pretty much redundant.


this isn't exactly 100% correct, but it will clear up some things I think for you;

Q. How do I understand this movie?

A quick guide on how to understand Donnie Darko:

1. Watch the movie, ideally as many times as possible because once you go to Step 2 you can never go back :-)

2. Go to DonnieDarko.com and try and complete the web site. The web site gives a huge amount of additional information, and is arguably essential viewing to completely understand the film. The web site was written in conjunction with the film by the Writer/Director, Richard Kelly. Note the web site is fairly cryptic and full of puzzles. If you get very stuck visit Ruined Eye's excellent guide.

3. If you don't get very far in the web site, or you're lazy, you can take a shortcut to RuinedEye.com and read "The Philosophy of Time Travel" which explains a lot about the movie (note that parts of The Philosophy of Time Travel have been added to the Director's Cut, which was Richard Kelly's original intention with the film). The Philosophy of Time Travel is one of the pieces of information contained within the DonnieDarko.com web site, and has subsequently also been added to some of the DVD releases within the special features.

If you're still stuck then obviously continue reading the FAQ. If the FAQ doesn't help then visit the IMDB forum or the various dedicated Yahoo groups, have a read there first, and if your question has not been asked before then post it. Equally drop me an e-mail and I'll add any good questions to the FAQ, or clarify answers as required.

Ultimately Richard Kelly intended for this movie to have multiple interpretations, and he has never (and most likely will never) given a complete explanation as to the main plot.

Also, there are many levels to this movie. Part of the FAQ is explaining the main plot thread which is fairly "cold" science fiction, but of course there is much more and many more levels to the movie than this, and I'm certainly not saying that this is all there is!

Another great companion to the film is the Donnie Darko book which includes a long interview with Richard Kelly, the shooting script, photos from the film, and more.

So if you still aren't sure, and don't want to follow the above, read on...


Q. What is Donnie doing in this movie, in a nutshell?

It depends how you interpret the movie. I repeat that ultimately Richard Kelly intended for this movie to have multiple interpretations, and he has never (and most likely will never) given a complete explanation as to the main plot. But you can draw conclusions from the evidence provided and come up with some cohesive plot threads. So...

In a nutshell, my favoured explanation is that the Universe has become corrupt and is ending. Donnie (and others) are manipulated by Frank the "rabbit" (and whoever manipulates Frank) to save the Universe.

Q. Why is the Universe ending?

It is inferred from the Philosophy of Time Travel that the universe is ending because time has become corrupted. The seemingly logical conclusion is that time has become corrupted by the appearance of the jet engine in the Tangent Universe. The Tangent Universe is an offshoot from the Primary Universe due to the different events that occur in it.

The key here is that the engine was in the future, and then through a corruption (*not* a wormhole) it appeared 28 days in the past. It was in the future, then in the past, with no logical/physical reason for its appearance.

Q. What does Donnie do to save the Universe, in detail?

This depends on your interpretation of the film as it has many levels.

In my favoured interpretation the evidence e.g. the Philosophy of Time Travel (which can also be found within the puzzles at DonnieDarko.com, and on some of the DVD versions), points to the fact that the Universe has become corrupted, forming a Tangent Universe. As mentioned above, the logical conclusion is that the event that causes this is the arrival of the jet engine.

Therefore Donnie's objective, through manipulation by Frank (the man in the rabbit costume who appears mostly in his dreams), is to give a valid reason for the engine's appearance i.e. either opening or creating a wormhole back to the past. It is also assumed that he does this with telekinesis and his power to create water (the fourth dimensional construct) as it is stated these are some of the powers of the Living Receiver.

So in short, corruption = bad, wormhole = good, hence Universe saved.

Relevant quotes from the Philosophy of Time Travel that support this:

"Artifacts returned to the Primary Universe are often linked to religious iconography; as their appearance on Earth seems to defy logical explanation."

"The Fourth Dimension of Time is a stable construct, though it is not impenetrable. ....Incidents when the fabric of the fourth dimension becomes corrupted are incredibly rare. ....If a Tangent Universe occurs, it will be highly unstable, sustaining itself for no longer than several weeks."

"....The Manipulated Dead will often set an Ensurance Trap for the Living Receiver to ensure that the Artifact is returned safely to the Primary Universe."

"If the Ensurance Trap is successful, the Living Receiver is left with no choice but to use his Fourth Dimensional Power to send the Artifact back in time into the Primary Universe before the Black Hole collapses upon itself."

"The Living Receiver is often (blessed) with a Fourth Dimensional Power(s). These include increased strength, telekinesis, mind control, and the ability to conjure fire and water."

"The Fourth Dimensional Construct is made of Water."

Q. Is it possible that Frank waking Donnie changed time, and therefore corrupted the Universe?

It's possible as an alternate interpretation perhaps, but the Philosophy of Time Travel, and a number of other plot elements don't make sense based on this.

Q. Did Donnie travel in time?

It would seem not, but again it depends on your interpretation of the film.

Based on the above evidence, he didn't travel in time himself in that he didn't actually enter a wormhole. Donnie didn't need to travel in time as he changed the past by affecting the destination of the jet engine, and ending the time corruption. The only object that traveled in time was the jet engine.

Q. Did Donnie's mother and/or sister have to be on the plane?

No. His mother needed to be away from the house so they could have the party, and so the subsequent events could occur. Refer to the end of the FAQ for a timeline of important events.

Q. Why is Donnie laughing at the end and/or why doesn't he get out of bed?

Richard Kelly states this in the DVD commentary (with Jake Gyllenhal):

1. That he felt the whole experience had been a dream, and was therefore laughing with relief that he had woken up from this, hence doesn't get out of bed.

2. That the journey through the Tangent Universe had solved Donnie's problem of dying alone through achieving enlightenment, and subsequently he knew he was going to "something better" (from his letter to Roberta Sparrow). He was therefore laughing through sheer joy and anticipation, and didn't want to get out of bed.

Q. Did Donnie need to die at the end, hence not get out of bed?

It isn't entirely clear. Richard Kelly states a couple of things in the DVD commentary (with Jake Gyllenhal) that Frank was honking his car horn warning Donnie to get up and:

1. he didn't listen;

2. or didn't hear.

So this implies that he didn't need to die. See the question above also, and the explanations of the main plot thread above.

There does seem to be a fated aspect for Donnie's death, in that all Living Receiver's die. Something that is covered in The Philosophy of Time Travel.

Note that Frank does honk his horn in the first sequence as well, but he doesn't drive away the second time around.

Q. Who is Frank and/or the rabbit?

Frank is actually Donnie's sister's (Elizabeth Darko) boyfriend. The Frank we see through most of the film should technically be referred to as Manipulated Dead Frank (to understand the Manipulated Dead and Manipulated Living read the Philosophy of Time Travel referred to above). Manipulated Dead Frank (MD Frank) is appearing from another dimension, and essentially the future of the Tangent Universe, to help Donnie achieve the goal of changing the fate and saving the universe. The Frank we see at the very end of the film, in the scenes were Gretchen is run over and the "Dreams" sequence, is the "real" alive Frank, that is the Frank who exists in our universe prior to being shot by Donnie (in the Tangent Universe at least).

There are also some links to the living Frank throughout the film, for example:

1. He drops off Elizabeth after a date (just before the jet engine hits the house)

2. He drives past Donnie in his red Trans Am when Donnie is cycling home near the beginning of the film

3. He is on a beer run at Elizabeth's party (the notice on the fridge. Note the similarity with the "They Made Me Do It" handwriting around the school mascot)

Q. Why do Karen Pomeroy and Kenneth Monnitoff have the conversation "Donnie Darko"... "I know"?

Richard Kelly states in the DVD commentary that they are being manipulated, and they are aware of Donnie and that something is going on with him.

Q. Why does Kenneth Monnitoff say he can't continue the conversation with Donnie about time travel?

As it was a church linked school a conversation about God and time travel was taboo for the teacher.

Q. When Donnie's parents are talking about Frankie Feedler are they referring to Frank's father? Based on Frank saying that his father and grandfather were called Frank also.

It's possible, although it seems a bit unlikely that Frank's father died at this young age, hence Frank must have been conceived at or before this time. Of course no-one other than Richard Kelly knows for sure, and this detail has never been covered.

Q. Why does Dr. Thurman react the way she does to Donnie's comment about the sky opening up?

Her reaction is somewhat strange and out of character, so we can only assume that she is behaving as a Manipulated Living and trying to reassure Donnie.

Q. Why are the bullies (Seth Devlin and Ricky) in Grandma Death's (Roberta Sparrow's) house?

Earlier in the film Rose Darko refers to Roberta Sparrow having a gem collection, so we assume that this is a reason for them being there. Of course they needed to be there as part of the ensurance trap for Donnie, so we can assume they are also acting as the Manipulated Living.

Q. Why when the characters are in bed at the end of the movie, in the "Mad World montage", do they seem to recollect what happened in the Tangent Universe?

As background: at the end of the movie after we go back to the point where the jet engine hits the house we see Dr. Thurman wake up abruptly and look troubled, Karen Pomeroy is asleep in bed with Kenneth Monnitoff who is awake and looks concerned, Jim Cunningham is sitting upright in bed sobbing, Kitty Farmer is deep in thought, Cherita is smiling, and Frank is sitting on the floor touching his eye.

Essentially the characters remember what happened from the future, but now closed, Tangent Universe. The Dreams chapter in The Philosophy of Time Travel confirms this:

"When the Manipulated awakens from their Journey into the Tangent Universe, they are often haunted by the experience in their dreams. Many of them will not remember. ....Those who do remember the Journey are often overcome with profound remorse for the regretful actions buried within their Dreams, the only physical evidence buried within the Artifact itself, all that remains from the lost world."

Also Gretchen and Rose Darko (Donnie's Mum) seem to remember each other, based on them waving at each other at the end of the film.

Q. What does Donnie mumble when he has the knife held to his throat?

"Deus ex Machina", followed by "Our Saviour".

Q. What does "Deus Ex Machina" mean?

This is latin.

Deus = God

Ex = from the

Machina = Machine

Therefore, God from the Machine.

1. In Greek and Roman drama, a god lowered by stage machinery to resolve a plot or extricate the protagonist from a difficult situation.
2. An unexpected, artificial, or improbable character, device, or event introduced suddenly in a work of fiction or drama to resolve a situation or untangle a plot.
3. A person or event that provides a sudden and unexpected solution to a difficulty.

Reference: American Heritage Dictionary

Note that Deus Ex Machina is also mentioned in one of the deleted scenes related to the classroom discussion about Watership Down.

Q. Who is the jogger in the red tracksuit?

The web site reveals that this is a member of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) following Donnie, and see some pictures below as proof. The FAA are very concerned as to how an exact duplicate of the engine exists hence are following Donnie as a potential lead on why this is (and how he avoided being killed by the engine). Curiously the actor playing the member of the FAA is named Tom Tangen.



Q. In reference to Cellar Door being the most beautiful phrase, which "famous linguist" is Karen Pomeroy talking about?

JRR Tolkien (author of Lord of the Rings and other books, and he also worked on the Oxford English Dictionary, hence is famous and a linguist).

Q. What part does Cherita Chen play in the film?

It's possible to interpret Cherita's role in various ways. Richard Kelly has simply stated in interviews that Cherita is the innocent (she does nothing wrong and has good motivation), and is victimised for this (for both racial and size bias).

Personally I don't feel that Cherita plays any other role.

Q. Why does Donnie put on Cherita's ear muffs?

Again this is open to interpretation. Personally I feel that Donnie was sympathising with her character, so to sympathise with her he steps into her world by wearing the ear muffs.

Cherita presumably wears ear muffs to block out the nasty comments from other children.

Q. Why does Donnie say to Cherita "I promise that one day everything’s going to be better for you."

Again this is open to interpretation. Perhaps Donnie (with his future insight) has some ability to know what happens to Cherita in the future. Personally I feel that he has more of an insight into the way the world works, and he knows that Cherita will grow up into a well adjusted person based on her obviously well adjusted character.

Q. Gretchen appears in the notes of The Philosophy of Time Travel as a Manipulated Dead, why?

I feel this is because both Frank and Gretchen die in the Tangent Universe. Frank obviously appears to Donnie in his Manipulated Dead form, projected from the future, but I see no evidence as to Gretchen appearing to Donnie this way. It would have both confused Donnie and confused the audience also.

Q. What is the song played during the cinema sequence, and at the beginning of the credits?

"For Whom the Bell Tolls"
Written by Steve Baker and Carmen Daye
Courtesy of Associated Production Music LLC

This track is available as a royalty free track from Associated Production Music on one of their collections titled Voicing the Classic 2. More importantly it can also be bought now on the 2CD Donnie Darko soundtrack, currently only available in the UK.

I used to provide this track for download on MP3 but as it can be bought from both these sources (particularly the new soundtrack) I have removed the download.

Note that this track is often confused with Ave Maria, but this is definitely not Ave Maria.

Q. Why is there no soundtrack with the original 80's tracks?

It was not possible based on the initial limited release of the film and the expensive requirements for licensing to release a soundtrack with these songs. But...

... A 2 CD soundtrack has appeared for sale in the UK (with a release date of 4th October 2004) which contains both the original soundtrack CD and a large number of tracks (but not all) from both the original and Director's Cut. Follow the previous link for a complete track listing.

Note of course that there is still the original soundtrack for sale with the original tracks by Michael Andrews, and the rearrangement of Mad World sung by Gary Jules.

Q. What tracks were not on the original soundtrack?

"The Killing Moon"
Written by Will Sergeant, Ian McCulloch, Les Pattinson and Pete De Freitas
Performed by Echo & The Bunnymen
Courtesy of Sire Records/Warner Music U.K. Ltd.
By arrangement with Warner Special Products

(Plays during the sequence when Donnie cycles home at the beginning of the original movie. Note this is changed in the Director's Cut to Never Tear Us Apart, by INXS. In the Director's Cut The Killing Moon replaces Under the Milkyway during the party sequence)

"Lucid Memory"
Written and Performed by Sam Bauer and Ged Bauer

(Used during the "Cunning Visions" video)

"Head over Heels"
Written by Curt Smith and Roland Orzabal
Performed by Tears For Fears
Courtesy of Mercury Records Limited
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises

(Plays during the sequence where Donnie gets off the school bus, and we are "introduced" to various characters in the film)

"Lucid Assembly"
Written and Performed by Ged Bauer and Mike Bauer

(Used during the "Cunning Visions" video)

"Ave Maria"
Written by Giulio Caccino and Paul Pritchard
Courtesy of Associated Production Music LLC

(Played in the background when Rose, Donnie's Mum, is talking to her friend)

"For Whom the Bell Tolls"
Written by Steve Baker and Carmen Daye
Courtesy of Associated Production Music LLC

(Plays during the sequence where Donnie is in the cinema with Frank and Gretchen, and also plays over the end titles)

"Show Me"
Written by Quito Colayco and Tony Hertz
Courtesy of Associated Production Music LLC

(Plays during Cherita's "Autumn Angel" sequence)

"Notorious"
Written by Simon LeBon, Nick Rhodes and John Taylor
Performed by Duran Duran
Courtesy of Capitol Records
Under license from EMI-Capitol Music Special Markets

(Sparkle Motion's dance track. Originally it was intended that West End Girls would be used, but the licensing cost was too expensive)

"Proud To Be Loud"
Written by Marc Ferrari
Performed by The Dead Green Mummies
Courtesy of Marc Ferrari / Master Source

(Plays at Elizabeth's party. Some sources tell me this is a version by Pantera)

"Love Will Tear Us Apart"
Written and Performed by Joy Division
Courtesy of Warner Music U.K. Ltd.
By arrangement with Warner Special Products

(Plays at Elizabeth's party, prior to Donnie going upstairs with Gretchen)

"Under the Milky Way"
Written by Steven Kilbey and Karin Jansson
Performed by The Church
Courtesy of Arista Records, Inc.
Courtesy of Festival Mushroom Records Pty Ltd.

(Plays at Elizabeth's party, when Donnie and Gretchen come downstairs, but only in the original version)

Note that two tracks (as mentioned above) used in the rough cut of the film shown at the Sundance Film Festival were West End Girls, by the Pet Shop Boys (replaced by Notorious in the original and Director's Cut) and Never Tear Us Apart, by INXS (replaced by The Killing Moon in the original cut, and reinstated in the Director's Cut).

Q. Will there be a Director's Cut?

Yes, the Director's Cut was released at the Seattle International Film Festival on the 29th May 2004. It has spread to other cities in the USA, and other countries as well (including the UK and Australia) and is likely to finish its cinematic run soon.

The UK distributor provided some money for the Director's Cut, and it is being shown on a limited theatrical run in the UK. More info on where it's playing from this link.

For up-to-date information on release schedules for the cinema visit Richard-Kelly.net and Newmarket Films.

The Director's Cut has also come to DVD. Again for the UK the release date is 4th October 2004 (link to Play.com). It is confirmed that the DVD will be released in the USA in February 2005, and Australia in December 2004.

If you have up-to-date information about where the DVD is being released in your country then let me know and I will include it here.

Q. What does the Director's Cut contain?

Deleted scenes from the original DVD, new unseen footage, new special effects, and some changes to the soundtrack.

For a complete detailed list of the changes follow this list to DVD Times.

Q. What is the font used for the titles?

This is a slight variation on the Harem TrueType Font. The Harem font is available for download from here (57kb), and linked from the downloads section of the main page.

Q. Is the Philosophy of Time Travel a real book?

No.

Richard Kelly wrote it during the editing stages of the film, and was intending to incorporate it into the original version but time and budget constraints prevented this. The Director's Cut restores the original vision of the pages that Richard Kelly wanted.

Q. Are there more pages to the Philosophy of Time Travel?

Although the book Dr. Monnitoff gives to Donnie seems to have many pages, only those which are on the web site and DVD have been shown. It is assumed these were the only pages created, for the web site.

Q. What are the key points of the movie?

This is a quick run through of the key points in the movie and those incidents which form the ensurance trap for Donnie:

2 OCTOBER 1988

1. Manipulated Dead (MD) Frank coerces Donnie to sleepwalk to the golf course (preventing him being killed).

2. The jet engine strikes the house.

5 OCTOBER 1988

3. Donnie is coerced by MD Frank to sleepwalk to the school and break the water main. Because of this the school is flooded and Donnie walks home with Gretchen, resulting in her "going" with him.

6 OCTOBER 1988

4. Donnie and his friends see Grandma Death walking to the mail box, and Ronald suggests that someone should "write that bitch". Perhaps manipulating Donnie to write to her, so that she is reading the letter when Frank's car swerves to miss her.

10 OCTOBER 1988

5. Donnie discusses the time travel theories with Dr. Monnitoff, and is given the Philosophy of Time Travel.

18 OCTOBER 1988

6. Gretchen tells Donnie "And what if you could go back in time and take all those hours of pain and darkness and replace them with something better?" perhaps manipulating him to complete his task later on.

22 OCTOBER 1988

7. Donnie discusses more time travel with Dr. Monnitoff.

23 OCTOBER 1988

8. Donnie finds Jim Cunningham's wallet outside his house. With the address he knows which house to burn down later. By burning down the house Kitty has to appear at his arraignment, meaning that Rose (Donnie's Mum) has to go to the Talent Contest, meaning the party takes place and Donnie is with Gretchen "cementing" their relationship.

9. Donnie sets fire to Jim Cunningham's house that evening.

25 OCTOBER 1988

10. Kitty Farmer asks Rose to chaperone Sparkle Motion as she is appearing at Jim Cunningham's arraignment. The party can happen.

26 OCTOBER 1988

11. Karen Pomeroy tells Donnie about the phrase "Cellar Door", thus dropping the clue that Donnie picks up on later when entering Roberta Sparrow's house via the cellar.

29 OCTOBER 1988

12. Elizabeth gets her letter for getting in to Harvard. They decide to throw the party.

13. Gretchen's mother has vanished, she comes to the party to find Donnie and stay in a "safe place".

30 OCTOBER 1988

14. They enter Roberta Sparrow's house by the cellar door.

15. Gretchen is run over by Frank, who swerves to avoid Roberta Sparrow reading Donnie's letter.

16. Donnie shoots Frank, allowing him to come back and help him as the Manipulated Dead.

17. Donnie perhaps removes the artifact (jet engine) from the plane, and changes its destination to the Primary Universe.



The End!
 
I think Donnie was told by Roberta Sparrow to goto the top of the hill (Carpathian Ridge?) as seen at the start of the movie because that is where he can send the Jet Engine back through the wormhole into the Primary Universe!


if that makes sense :)


but each time I watch it, I notice different things so I bet I am 100% wrong..... but that's what I love about the movie, it's pretty much whatever you make of it!

:D
 
Finding Neverland

I thought this was a beautiful and thought provoking movie on the wonders of the human imagination.

It is a fictional account of how J.M. Barrie concocted the Peter Pan story.

I'm still yet to find out if *any* of it bears any relation to the truth...it certainly seemed like a good supposition to me, but then again I guess that's the point.

Johnny Depp was great as JM Barrie, but I thought Kate Winslet was a bit lacking in the charisma that her role needed....:\

The four children were excellent, bringing just the right blend of cuteness and adult-like perpicacity to the movie.

One thing - I didn't cry. I had been told I would cry as I'm a sucker for sad movies, but I was struggling to raise a tear. I put this down to the lack of attachment that I formed to Kate Winslet's character [Sylvia].

A meandering, sweet examination of the powers of imagination and belief.

3 out of 5

:)
 
<3

Went to see The Amityville Horror last night.

Whilst being cheesy and in some places unoriginal, the whole movie turned out to be a well-crafted, almost flawless piece of cinema.

The cinematography wasn't brilliant or in any real way inspiring, but it was unobtrusive.

The make-up and wardrobe were again, nothing detracting from the story at hand.

The script was taught, in places trite yet that was entirely expected.

The tension and suspence built up throughout the movie went largely unnoticed, until I realised I was gasping for air, literally panting - - - and squeezing the boy's hand like I was going to fall off a cliff.

The special effects were astounding - - - really placed well with the other real actors and elements, and the acting was exceptional for the genre.

Melissa George, whilst having a pathetic American accent and a tendency to basically block the view of anything else with her toothy smile managed well as the desperate wife, and Ryan Reynolds was amazing as the deeply troubled husband.

The goofy kids weren't too appallingly gangly and cute and smarmy [thank god/dess], and I tolerated them with reasonable ease.

* * *

On the whole, this movie made me what I would call, whole-body-scared - - - my adrenalin was going crazy, and I was actually shaking for a long time after the ending.

I've resolved I'm never reading the book.

* * *

16.gif
16.gif
16.gif
16.gif
/
16.gif
16.gif
16.gif
16.gif
16.gif


amityville_house.jpg
 
I saw Thirteen on Foxtel last night.

What a disturbing and fucked up movie! It's supposed to deal with all the "pressures" kids are under at that age these days but it seemed way too far-fetched for me (even though it's semi autobiographical). Then again it is set in LA on the wrong side of the tracks.
 
War of the worlds:

ALiens with big tripod machinery attack earth. earth calls forth it's greatest hero... Tom Cruise.

To be honest I didn't walk into this film expecting a lot. After all Tom Cruise, please. But it turned out I was in for a pleasant suprise. The movie started quickly, alowing for character development throughout the drama, rather than heaping it all on at first.

There were moments that still made me cringe, the video camera filming after the emp burst, the only working car. But aside from the little slips I enjoyed the movie. Was a little dissapointed by the ending, not so much as how the aliens get it as I was expecting this, but rather the final few minutes.

Two scenes in the movie were very well written, the "ball" scene and the diner scene.

Better than I expected : ***
 
The Fantastic Four:

You know, the fantastic four? It's like the invisible bitch and flame on and shit...

With the latest comic renditions on big screen I was expecting good things from this movie. It didn't deliver. The story was flatlining the whole way through. The love story contained in it was expected and the outcome inevitable. The only decent character (Ben Grimm (the thing)) didn't have enough of his story put in.

This movie and all copies should be set on fire: *
 
Layer Cake...what can i say ...fucken awesome...best drug movie of this year..

just like P_D said

i got it on recommendation from him
 
i watched madagascar a few days ago...

it was via boredem... extremem amounts of it... i wish i wanked instead, as it would of been more exciting...

i think i was expecting a lot more due to the quality of cartoon movies that come out... shrek/finding nemo...

i found madagascar boring and just ... yeah...

had some moments, but if Chris Rock wasnt in it... it would of just been like watching the titanic go down!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top