pharmakos
Bluelighter
@thenightwatch, it's true that they could circumvent their specifications by calling an 'expert witness' to the stand, or similar, but this is a LOT of effort for them to have to go through. Not to mention, something of that nature could theoretically apply to ANY research chemical, cannabinoid or not - yet we don't see expert witnesses being called to testify against etaqualone (a blatant analogue of a Schedule 1 Drug). As you mentioned, this is something US dealers of EAM-2201 may have to be concerned about, but I strongly doubt someone arrested with a couple hundred milligrams of EAM-2201 on them would get in trouble for it.
Cops are pretty dumb, at the street level. If it's not explicitly listed as a banned chemical, Officer Shmoe isn't going to cross-examine the structures for possible new analogues. (of course, if it's in a blend with a fancy package, they'll know what it is and you'll probably be fucked)
If they don't have proof of intent to use for human consumption, I would put my money on EAM-2201 being safe.
yup, like i said originally, the vendors selling this stuff are playing with fire.
the street level user probably won't have any problems with this one for now.