papa
Bluelight Crew
merged...
Don't be silly. People have allergies of different severity. I'm allergic to grass, but I just get a rash, maybe red eyes, I don't get anaphylaxis.You're not allergic to weed or you would be dead from smoking it. Your throat would close up and you'd go into anaphylactic shock.
Bold claim. Got a reference?You don't have cancer, because THC CURES CANCER.
Let's see these studies, then.There have been numerous studies where pure THC was administered to cancerous lab rats. The more THC the rats received, the smaller and less numerous their tumors were.
This has been applied to modern medicine. Pure THC was administered to at least one patient with prostate cancer. His cancer went away.
Again, source please? Are you suggesting that smoking weed can cure someone of poisoning?Also, marijuana dilates the airways, causing you to expel most toxins with a cough.
What? That seems like an incredibly simple mechanism. Almost too simple... what about menthols? Do they cure cancer? Can I cure my cancer with crystal meth? Cancer is an incredibly complex disease, I think your understanding is a little naive.Tobacco constricts your airways, causing you to hold all that nasty shit in.
That's why weed cures cancer and tobacco causes it.
That doesn't mean that cannabis cures cancer! There's never been a documented case of banging your head against a brick wall causing cancer, that in no way means that it is a cure.The fact is there's never been a documented case of cancer caused by marijuana.
O RLY? You know, people are actually quite interested in cancer cures, you'd have thought that a proven cure would have made the news, especially if that proven cure happened to be the world's most popular illegal drug, no?And there HAVE been instances of cancer being cured by pure THC.
I'm not the one making ridiculous claims. Burden of proof does not lie with the skeptic, Google is not a reference. I could say "Freemasons run the country! Google it.", and you would think it was weak shit. Which it is. Google gives me no studies, no articles from reputable journals of opinion, just youtube videos, propaganda from medical cannabis advocacy groups with huge vested interests, and other such spurious, unsubstantiated bullshit.Just Google it. You have that feature right? UTFSE?
Do what myself? Search for studies that I don't think exist? That sounds like a massive waste of my time.Do it yourself.
One of which studies? There's an article on NowPublic (which is basically a blogging service that anyone can use, i.e. about as reliable a source of information as Twitter) that neither links to nor cites this supposed study. I call shenanigans. I'm sure that you want to believe that cannabis is a panacea, but a little critical thinking wouldn't go amiss. Anyway, sleep tight, sweet dreams.one of those studies was performed by Harvard.
yeah know that but im not paranoid. Im not looking out my window or very suspicious about what people are possibly implying thinking doing ect its just anxiety nervousness that weed gives to some people or everyone in different situations.
I call shenanigans.
I do study it. That's why I know that your claims are outrageous and belie a hugely naive and oversimplified and wishful understanding of the topic. You have still failed to provide a single source, and for the record, THC killing some cancer cells in no way means that THC cures cancer. I don't know what you intended by throwing my words back at me, but critical thinking doesn't include spunking away hours of your time researching obviously bogus claims, it involves using your rational intuition to identify blatant falsehoods and misinformation.You really need somebody to find all the resources for you? If it interests you, study it. Don't simply disregard it and move on because somebody doesn't provide sources. Find your own sources. "a little critical thinking wouldn't go amiss."
Find it yourself! Why should anyone ever have to back up their claims?^ can you post up a standard trial which is a randomized double blind, placebo-controlled trial with large numbers of subjects? Or do you just have in vitro research (which is not proof)?
If you were allergic to endocannabinoids, then you'd be in trouble. Cannabis is not endocannabinoids. It contains a huge number of compounds, including dozens if not hundreds of terpenoids, any one of which could trigger an allergic reaction. People can be allergic to opioid drugs, despite the endorphin system.Just throwing it out there that our bodies have a natural endocannabinoid system, so if you were allergic to weed, then you probably wouldn't be too well off.
National Cancer Institute said:Cannabinoids may cause antitumor effects by various mechanisms, including induction of cell death, inhibition of cell growth, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis.[9-11] Cannabinoids appear to kill tumor cells but do not affect their nontransformed counterparts and may even protect them from cell death. These compounds have been shown to induce apoptosis in glioma cells in culture and induce regression of glioma tumors in mice and rats. Cannabinoids protect normal glial cells of astroglial and oligodendroglial lineages from apoptosis mediated by the CB1 receptor.[12]
source
Dude, sleep paralysis is tripped out, once you get over the fear. You should be grateful whenever you get the chance to enter that totally weird and amazing and highly hallucinatory state of consciousness. :D