Invalid Usename
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2004
- Messages
- 2,923
We covered this a bit a few months ago:
Like I said before, finding a physician who specializes in reproductive toxicology is hard to find. I don't know where you live, but if you are in the states she may want to look up Dr. Lillian Swiersz at the Stanford University Medical Center. Dr. Swiersz is a member of the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Faculty, and she has a background in reproductive toxicology. Chances are she might be able to help pinpoint someone close to you with the right background.
Here's the contact page for their clinic:
http://www.stanfordhospital.com/clinicsmedServices/clinics/reproductive/REIhomePage.html
And here are a list of the physicians working in the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Faculty (including Dr. Lillian Swiersz):
http://www.stanfordhospital.com/clinicsmedServices/clinics/reproductive/REIfaculty.html
I'm not a doctor, and what I am about to say is not medically authorative.
But given the number of exposures she's had, I would suspect that there isn't that much to be concerned about (though I do encourage her to follow up with an evaluation by a specialist).
All of the rat studies that I've read, which show damage, are are performed with a continuous, high dose exposure, over long periods of times. If the same study method were applied to a human, it would equate with constant, high dosage use, for months. A sustained exposure for up to one full trimester, or 3 months.
That's a far cry from 5 medium level exposures, each approximately 8 hours in duration, spread over a 5 month period.
That's not to say that taking MDMA while pregnant isn't a risk, using any recreational drug during presents a certain risk to the child. But I suspect that this is more common an occurrence than is documented, as a lot of females take MDMA, some of them who are pregnant (without knowing it), and result in having healthy offspring.
Anyway, give them a call over at Stanford Medical Center. I'm certain that they'll be able to help you find an OB/GYN in your area with a sufficient background to help out.
Best of luck
Originally posted by Invalid Usename
http://www.bluelight.ru/vb/showthread.php?postid=2047627#post2047627
Reproductive Toxicologists are a rare bird, and many of them are research scientists, not MDs.
I don't know of many studies involving the first trimester. One such study was done at Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center in Chicago last year. Here is a report of the study:
http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/aug2003/nida-29.htm
Before you read the study:
The results of the study are somewhat concerning. But I'd like to point out several things: that rat metabolism is much faster than is a human's. And the exposure schedule in the study (rather unrealistic) is twice per day for 6 days total (and probably at abnormally high dosages of MDMA). That's 6 days out of a 21 day gestation cycle for rats.
Considering the length of gestation for rats compared to humans, this would be like taking a large dose of MDMA, twice per day, for a full trimester. You're friend ONLY took 1/2 pill, and ONLY once.
I would say that she doesn't have anything to worry about. That is such a low dosage, and you are only talking about one incident of exposure. In all honesty, I would think that her having a few alcoholic drinks in that period would be more threatening to her baby, than the MDMA exposure that she has had.
My advise would be to not worry about it. Even the specific cells which MDMA has an affinity for do not exist in the embryo at this stage of development. But if she still feels concerned, then recommend that she discuss this with her OB/GYN. He will be able to recommend if she needs to see a specialist or not.
Good luck, and tell her not to worry. Over 30 million MDMA dosages are taken worldwide in any given weekend. Imagine how many of those dosages are going into pregnant women who are not aware of it yet. This is probably far more common than you'd think. And healthy kids are still being born.

http://www.bluelight.ru/vb/showthread.php?postid=2047627#post2047627
No kidding. (btw, this would be far from being a fetus at this point.)s0nic said:I doubt there are too many doctors who know very much about the damages MDMA can have on a fetus. It's nothing that has been extensively researched with humans.
Reproductive Toxicologists are a rare bird, and many of them are research scientists, not MDs.
I don't know of many studies involving the first trimester. One such study was done at Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center in Chicago last year. Here is a report of the study:
http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/aug2003/nida-29.htm
Before you read the study:
The results of the study are somewhat concerning. But I'd like to point out several things: that rat metabolism is much faster than is a human's. And the exposure schedule in the study (rather unrealistic) is twice per day for 6 days total (and probably at abnormally high dosages of MDMA). That's 6 days out of a 21 day gestation cycle for rats.
Considering the length of gestation for rats compared to humans, this would be like taking a large dose of MDMA, twice per day, for a full trimester. You're friend ONLY took 1/2 pill, and ONLY once.
I would say that she doesn't have anything to worry about. That is such a low dosage, and you are only talking about one incident of exposure. In all honesty, I would think that her having a few alcoholic drinks in that period would be more threatening to her baby, than the MDMA exposure that she has had.
My advise would be to not worry about it. Even the specific cells which MDMA has an affinity for do not exist in the embryo at this stage of development. But if she still feels concerned, then recommend that she discuss this with her OB/GYN. He will be able to recommend if she needs to see a specialist or not.
Good luck, and tell her not to worry. Over 30 million MDMA dosages are taken worldwide in any given weekend. Imagine how many of those dosages are going into pregnant women who are not aware of it yet. This is probably far more common than you'd think. And healthy kids are still being born.


Like I said before, finding a physician who specializes in reproductive toxicology is hard to find. I don't know where you live, but if you are in the states she may want to look up Dr. Lillian Swiersz at the Stanford University Medical Center. Dr. Swiersz is a member of the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Faculty, and she has a background in reproductive toxicology. Chances are she might be able to help pinpoint someone close to you with the right background.
Here's the contact page for their clinic:
http://www.stanfordhospital.com/clinicsmedServices/clinics/reproductive/REIhomePage.html
And here are a list of the physicians working in the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Faculty (including Dr. Lillian Swiersz):
http://www.stanfordhospital.com/clinicsmedServices/clinics/reproductive/REIfaculty.html
I'm not a doctor, and what I am about to say is not medically authorative.
But given the number of exposures she's had, I would suspect that there isn't that much to be concerned about (though I do encourage her to follow up with an evaluation by a specialist).
All of the rat studies that I've read, which show damage, are are performed with a continuous, high dose exposure, over long periods of times. If the same study method were applied to a human, it would equate with constant, high dosage use, for months. A sustained exposure for up to one full trimester, or 3 months.
That's a far cry from 5 medium level exposures, each approximately 8 hours in duration, spread over a 5 month period.
That's not to say that taking MDMA while pregnant isn't a risk, using any recreational drug during presents a certain risk to the child. But I suspect that this is more common an occurrence than is documented, as a lot of females take MDMA, some of them who are pregnant (without knowing it), and result in having healthy offspring.
Anyway, give them a call over at Stanford Medical Center. I'm certain that they'll be able to help you find an OB/GYN in your area with a sufficient background to help out.
Best of luck
