Yes but there *might* be some rational things we can set as limits to prevent insane things from happening i.e. mass stockpiling of weapons, etc. I can't see how one person needs 3,500 guns. That's beyond the pale of reason.
There isn't even a "might". Mass stockpiling of weapons isn't gun violence. The act of harming/killing someone with a gun IS. You can't shoot 3500 weapons at a single time.
Chris are you familiar with the Paddock case?
I'd rather spend my money on drugs, travel, bills, food, more drugs, more drugs, more drugs, more travel, more drugs... than I would a gun)... but seriously.
Wait what? So you're arguing Paddock didn't do all of this himself?
Is this a conspiracy theory? 
so much for the 1st Amendment
It is going to take 2 seconds to switch weapons regardless. You have to drop the old one, and then pick up the new one. 2 seconds is 2 seconds. Whether you are changing guns or changing magazines.Chris are you familiar with the Paddock case?
In the mind of someone trying to do maximal damage, carnage, destruction, those extra 2 seconds are another...what... 8-10 bullets rattling out? You're the gun-user tell me. I wouldn't know, I'm not a gun nut (though I LOVE PROTECTING THE CONSTITUTION for you gun nuts!!!!
How many people did Paddock kill? You're telling me that the extra 1, 2, 5, 10+ people or whatever that could have been saved had he just been reloading every 2 seconds is like no big deal?
I dunno man. I'm thinking there's a centrist solution to try to set rational limits that I think most Americans could live with (especially if you let the gun nuts keep their 5-10 guns and they can still have selfies with them and go blow shit up in the woods on beers and laugh about it I THINK WE CAN ALL LIVE WITH SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE); the left want to ban semi-autos. The right including Massacre Mitch want NO CHANGE WHATSOEVER.
Are you guys really going to play those two extremes against each other?
EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY ONE PEOPLE were wounded. 58 people dead.
Gee, if even like 1 to 2% of those people weren't dead/wounded that'd be *a lot less human suffering* why are we so averse to centrist solutions.... WHY ISN'T HILLARY PRESIDENT *Millennial Snowflake Meltdown ensues*
So the 2nd shooter got away....??? I'm confused? What's the belief in your mind? Like tell me a story.
So the 2nd shooter got away....??? I'm confused? What's the belief in your mind? Like tell me a story.
Youtube videos aren't exactly a great source of information IMO.
So why did Paddock HAVE AND USE all those guns? And not just reload? Perhaps he was older, and his fingers may have been more nimble at just picking up another gun than reloading? Not everyone is in tip-top shape and was in the military fighting bravely overseas like you buddy
Hmmm, are people still getting killed by illegal guns around the world? I'll answer that for you ... YES. I was correct the first time.
![:\](https://bluelight.org/xf/BL_Images/Orig_Emoji/wrygrin.gif "wry grin :\")
) and does it really matter when that many people are injured?
so awesome
Hmmm, are people still getting killed by illegal guns around the world? I'll answer that for you ... YES. I was correct the first time.
Care to join the rational debate on what could be done to help us over here, my friend?Yes they are. But my point is that the rest of the world has more chance of solving it than you guys...
I never said he DIDNT do this. I also never said the AR 15 couldnt injury/kill that many people in 10 minutes. They simply lied about what gun was used (probably to fit their narrative). The rate of fire was COMPLETELY OFF. Another gun was used, anyone with military experience (who has shot those weapons) would know.8( How do you explain his suicide 10 minutes into the attack? How do you explain the missing HD, the kid porn they found, the fact his brother had *tons* of kid porn.... I mean... come on. From my perspective he seems like he really did this.
I don't care what fucking guns he used or if he had an accomplice that switched out the guns because #fakenews I don't care because major changes to gun laws aren't coming (the best we can hope for is logic and reason to help guide the legislators' hands...
So you're saying w/ the AR-15's he couldn't injure 851 people and kill 58 in 10 minutes. Can you use math to back that up?
p.s. I REALLY WANT A m249
]
Like I said brotha, ive already seen the evidence before they deleted it all. TONS and TONS of stuff have been deleted off the internet/YouTube because it showed (and proved) to much. I really wish I could show you, but its already gone. I understand why you don't believe it now, which is understandable (because it's not there anymore).
