bingalpaws
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 3,671
(liked the rest of your post btw, agree w/ most)
Mostslepton said:no, crackheads are not people. The crack spirits have taken them over.
human vs crackhead = crackhead dead - just as much as human vs cockroach = cockroach dead.
Kill all the crackheads and everyone the crackheads associate with. It's like a virus.. it's like zombification.
Crackheads aren't real people. I'm not even sure if they are alive. I think the crack actually keeps them alive while they are really dead.
Crackheads are zombies, seriously. That's how the idea of zombies came around. Look it up. Google it.
Zombies in the movies are nothing more than an allegory for crackheads. 28 weeks later? Yeah, crackheads.
And just so you know I've been in "the hood" and have witnessed firsthand what crack does.. so STFU.
Actually, I’ve never seen the movie “Dazed and Confused”… however, I can say… it’s a M-O-V-I-E dude. You do know movies are made up and do not reflect the realities of the word, don’t you? Man, and you think I’m brainwashed?
If you truly believe a human being is as insignificant as a fly, then you are the one who is dense.
Then you must believe freedom is concept of a moron. “Rights” were ‘dreamed up’ to secure freedom against oppression.
Compassion for me, but not the mother of six who was needlessly killed?
So you endorse only a particular set of drugs, and you maintain no compassion for the family in that article because of the type of drug? Would you be as starved for compassion as you are now if it was someone dealing “a plant”? You condemn crack and similar drugs because they are not held to your personal definition of “recreational value” that has a “potential to evolve the spirit”?
how do you so easily apply the meaning of the word “spirit” (a word and definition that some moron dreamed up) while you simultaneously refuse to acknowledge a concept of natural human rights?
people who make distinctions, the way you do, based upon whether it's synthetic or from the ground tend to be a little naive about their drugs.
There are plenty of synthetic compounds that'll "evolve your spirit", whatever that means
As far as your lil crackheads aint people theory there , only someone wit a big ego and small IQ runs around sayin generalizations wider than a 72 Eldorado.
you would blame women for being raped because they were born with cunts
Flap your jaws all you want. your ignorance shinin thru the cracks in your "logic" betrays your smug-ass claims that you know whats really up. If ya did....you wouldnt be talkin that shit.
Mostslepton said:I doubt you've ever had a friend turned crackhead/hardcore heroin user to the point where they'de do ANYTHING to get their fix, including lieing to friends and family, stealing from you or anyone, giving blowjobs for it if necessary, etc. I haven't, but I've known people who have.
Mostslepton said:Once again, it flew WAY over your head. What I was driving at is that the “point” of the thread (like the movie) is based on perception.
Mostslepton said:in fact, I decided to point out the fact that this particular scenario would have been avoided had this woman not have been involved with somebody who SELLS FUCKING CRACK out her house. This is a perfect example of the types of human beings who should not reproduce. That'll learn her.
Mostslepton said:There is existential freedom, sure. But where human and animal "rights" are concerned, it is nothing more than a mental construct respected only by the majority in human society. In the eyes of nature, you only have a "right" by virtue of the fact that you can do whatever the fuck you want and most likely will unless a certain consequence dictates otherwise (see: gravity, cause and effect, and -more recently/newly - man-made bullshit laws).
Mostslepton said:I'm noticing a pattern here. I'm going to quit operating under the assumption that you are perceptive enough to follow along with me. While I never explicitly stated anything to that effect, the meaning behind that statement was inferred. Again, adding levity and responding with an imitation of your word choice in order to illustrate a point.
Mostslepton said:This is a perfect example of the types of human beings who should not reproduce. That'll learn her.
Mostslepton said:People who use drugs for recreation but at least put some research into what they put in their bodies, and people who use [most] any drugs with the intent of achieving advanced states of consciousness, evolving their minds/spirit, etc; this I'm all for.
Mostslepton said:But I don't give a fuck about crack heads and junkies. Kill them all for all I care, you feel me?
Mostslepton said:That's where I stand on responsible drug use, and again it is my personal OPINION. I'm not saying it's the way it should be or anything. It's how I feel. No need to take it up the ass.
Mostslepton said:Dude, spirituality does not imply morals and other such mental constructs. And surely, it also depends on how you define the word. You know nothing of my beliefs in regard to spirituality, and if you are falsely assuming that I have no notion of compassion or that I lack spiritual awareness just because I don't give two shits about crackheads; you are then sadly mistaken.
Mostslepton said:True crackheads aren't really people. They are under the crack spell, and controlled by the spirit of the crack.