Sturnam
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 738
Recently, I've been very confused about the whole ketamine enantomer deal. from everything I have read here (several TR's) and one on erowid, the S(+) isomer is the psychedelic one, without the strong tendency to knock you out.
However, from reading the journal articles they all say that S(+) is used because of the exact opposite reasons.
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2185332
Even wiki agrees (although i know it's not the best source).
So, what's the deal with the enantomers then? I find it pretty hard to believe that the scientific community could make multiple blunders (more than one study done on this), and yet I also find it hard to believe that all the educated people here would overlook this fact. Is there something I'm missing?
However, from reading the journal articles they all say that S(+) is used because of the exact opposite reasons.
S(+) ketamine, because of its higher anesthetic potency and lower risk of psychotomimetic reactions, has been suggested to be superior to presently available racemic ketamine.
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2185332
Even wiki agrees (although i know it's not the best source).
Since (S)-ketamine has greater analgesic effects and less hallucinogenic side effects than (R)-ketamine, the pure (S) enantiomer is sometimes preferred to the racemic mix for use in medical procedures, especially when lower doses are used for minor surgical procedures where the patient remains conscious during the operation.
So, what's the deal with the enantomers then? I find it pretty hard to believe that the scientific community could make multiple blunders (more than one study done on this), and yet I also find it hard to believe that all the educated people here would overlook this fact. Is there something I'm missing?

